Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.
Wikipedia
This user believes that anyone who thinks
Wikipedia is an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website.
Because of real life, this user will be editing on and off.
This user is a preservationist who believes Wikipedians should avoid agressive non-notability deletion and advocates that the
notability rule be amended to specify that any subject with some historical value can merit an article.
Details here.
I might be what you call an "
inclusionist." I don't like to see information deleted. If something is to be removed, then I think it should at least be considered how to explain it differently. As much as I hate commercial pollution of Wikipedia, you can still use language to make it clear that it may not be "encyclopedic," in nature. I believe leaving even the undesirable content in Wikipedia (as long as its explained in such way) can be
encyclopedic, in and of itself. Having said that, though, I don't particularly like the idea of this whole "deletionist vs. inclusionist" mentality... editing wars suck.
Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.
Wikipedia
This user believes that anyone who thinks
Wikipedia is an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website.
Because of real life, this user will be editing on and off.
This user is a preservationist who believes Wikipedians should avoid agressive non-notability deletion and advocates that the
notability rule be amended to specify that any subject with some historical value can merit an article.
Details here.
I might be what you call an "
inclusionist." I don't like to see information deleted. If something is to be removed, then I think it should at least be considered how to explain it differently. As much as I hate commercial pollution of Wikipedia, you can still use language to make it clear that it may not be "encyclopedic," in nature. I believe leaving even the undesirable content in Wikipedia (as long as its explained in such way) can be
encyclopedic, in and of itself. Having said that, though, I don't particularly like the idea of this whole "deletionist vs. inclusionist" mentality... editing wars suck.