Should be speediable - it would be an A1 in articlespace - but not a test page despite having "LOL ~~~~" stuck onto the end of this hopeless attempt at an actual article.
As above. An external link and an unremarkable claim about an apparently unremarkable individual; but misclicking the ~~~~ button in the middle of it doesn't turn the entire page into a test.
This had the article wizard article skeleton, with nothing added to it. The closest thing so far to a test. If it were in userspace, it'd be a G6 under the inexplicably-misplaced "Deleting userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text if the user who created the page has been inactive for at least one year" subcriterion; if it were in articlespace it would be an A3. Tagging it {{db-test}} was no more helpful or accurate than just a {{delete}} with no rationale.
A copyvio warning by
User:Diannaa, which the ip in question blanked and stuck a {{db-test}} on. Horrifically, it was honored. I might have deleted it as a U1 as a mercy, but there was zero testing involved here.
Plausibly a test, but more likely its author was just very confused. Would have been better to delete with the old default text "Content was: 'INDIAN.'" which is all that was there.
Another genuine attempt at creating an article that would be instantly deleted as an A7 in articlespace. Not a test except in the sense of "What happens if I put an unreferenced oneliner about a guy with a job on Wikipedia?"
Six-word "[Firstname] [Lastname] is a [nationality] [occupation]" form article mercifully moved out of the main namespace. I A7 these once they're an hour old; I've never once seen one get improved post-draftification/userfication. (No doubt people will now jump all over me with counterexamples.)
Page content was identical to the title. This isn't a test, and wouldn't be even if the page content was empty; it was an error, and not really a difficult one to make - the author put his intended content into the wrong field, just like you sometimes see with articles tagged A3, zero content, and a whole article in the edit summary.
An attempt to create an infobox for
Zakir Rashid Bhat in the wrong namespace instead of in the article. Genuine but unsuccessful attempts at editing aren't tests.
An unsourced, very short article about a cancelled video game. Wouldn't have been a speedy even if it was in article space, unless your threshold for A1 is much higher than typical.
Consisted solely of a quote by an unremarkable person. An identical article at that person's name in mainspace was deleted as an A7. Not unambiguously a test.
A reference. Currently
at DRV. Unambiguously not a test, except in the sense of "Which admin gets their name dragged through the mud for a week for daring to delete one of Taku's contextless substubs?"
"== bivfcxi8fc ghj ==↵{{AFC submission|[default parameters from clicking the submit button}}↵{{documentation|[default parameters from clicking the documentation button]}}↵is the best↵↵ubc8on". Unambiguously patent nonsense. Likely a test, too, but not unambiguously so.
Consisted of {{
subst:Biography}} when it was deleted this time. I'd have deleted as A3, with a pointer to the
subject's afd if I'd happened to notice it existed.
This was clearly an editing test; it was the result of mashing the ref, galley, and table buttons (and inserting the editor's name at the prompts - clearly a real name, but nothing to do with the article name). Was also tagged (but not deleted) as an A1, which it also qualified for.
A fragment of infobox parameters. Could have been deleted under a number of speedy criteria (it was tagged db-nonsense); G2 wasn't an unreasonable choice.
A denied attempt to get
Cyberbot I to gather adminstats for a non-admin. Was tagged U1, and fits the spirit (if not the letter) of that criterion. Would've been a valid G7 too. Unclear why the deleting admin spontaneously labelled it a test.
A list of addresses from four British soap opera series. This was clearly opinion-based and little else; not at all clearly a test. Would have easily fit into the old wording of A1, "very short article with little or no context", but not the almost uselessly-strict new wording "not enough context to figure out the subject of the article". So hooray, admins are still deleting them anyway, but now they're lying about why; that's so much better.
A one-sentence draft about, as you'd expect, Brookburn Primary School. Wouldn't be deleteable in mainspace, because we're stupid about schools for historical reasons. Unambiguously not a test.
Content was "'''hi i am [personal name omitted]'''ℳ". (The name had nothing to do with the article name.) Best fit was an A3 attempt to communicate. A7 also more defensible than G2.
Content was "Airline-dest-list". Not at all clear what this was, or even that it was wholly useless; it was created by an editor who's made lots of contribs to airline-related articles, and who was still active at the time of tagging. Better would have been to ask him wtf it was intended to be (the only mention of it on his talk page is the twinkle speedy notification) instead of just tagging G2 right away.
Should be speediable - it would be an A1 in articlespace - but not a test page despite having "LOL ~~~~" stuck onto the end of this hopeless attempt at an actual article.
As above. An external link and an unremarkable claim about an apparently unremarkable individual; but misclicking the ~~~~ button in the middle of it doesn't turn the entire page into a test.
This had the article wizard article skeleton, with nothing added to it. The closest thing so far to a test. If it were in userspace, it'd be a G6 under the inexplicably-misplaced "Deleting userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text if the user who created the page has been inactive for at least one year" subcriterion; if it were in articlespace it would be an A3. Tagging it {{db-test}} was no more helpful or accurate than just a {{delete}} with no rationale.
A copyvio warning by
User:Diannaa, which the ip in question blanked and stuck a {{db-test}} on. Horrifically, it was honored. I might have deleted it as a U1 as a mercy, but there was zero testing involved here.
Plausibly a test, but more likely its author was just very confused. Would have been better to delete with the old default text "Content was: 'INDIAN.'" which is all that was there.
Another genuine attempt at creating an article that would be instantly deleted as an A7 in articlespace. Not a test except in the sense of "What happens if I put an unreferenced oneliner about a guy with a job on Wikipedia?"
Six-word "[Firstname] [Lastname] is a [nationality] [occupation]" form article mercifully moved out of the main namespace. I A7 these once they're an hour old; I've never once seen one get improved post-draftification/userfication. (No doubt people will now jump all over me with counterexamples.)
Page content was identical to the title. This isn't a test, and wouldn't be even if the page content was empty; it was an error, and not really a difficult one to make - the author put his intended content into the wrong field, just like you sometimes see with articles tagged A3, zero content, and a whole article in the edit summary.
An attempt to create an infobox for
Zakir Rashid Bhat in the wrong namespace instead of in the article. Genuine but unsuccessful attempts at editing aren't tests.
An unsourced, very short article about a cancelled video game. Wouldn't have been a speedy even if it was in article space, unless your threshold for A1 is much higher than typical.
Consisted solely of a quote by an unremarkable person. An identical article at that person's name in mainspace was deleted as an A7. Not unambiguously a test.
A reference. Currently
at DRV. Unambiguously not a test, except in the sense of "Which admin gets their name dragged through the mud for a week for daring to delete one of Taku's contextless substubs?"
"== bivfcxi8fc ghj ==↵{{AFC submission|[default parameters from clicking the submit button}}↵{{documentation|[default parameters from clicking the documentation button]}}↵is the best↵↵ubc8on". Unambiguously patent nonsense. Likely a test, too, but not unambiguously so.
Consisted of {{
subst:Biography}} when it was deleted this time. I'd have deleted as A3, with a pointer to the
subject's afd if I'd happened to notice it existed.
This was clearly an editing test; it was the result of mashing the ref, galley, and table buttons (and inserting the editor's name at the prompts - clearly a real name, but nothing to do with the article name). Was also tagged (but not deleted) as an A1, which it also qualified for.
A fragment of infobox parameters. Could have been deleted under a number of speedy criteria (it was tagged db-nonsense); G2 wasn't an unreasonable choice.
A denied attempt to get
Cyberbot I to gather adminstats for a non-admin. Was tagged U1, and fits the spirit (if not the letter) of that criterion. Would've been a valid G7 too. Unclear why the deleting admin spontaneously labelled it a test.
A list of addresses from four British soap opera series. This was clearly opinion-based and little else; not at all clearly a test. Would have easily fit into the old wording of A1, "very short article with little or no context", but not the almost uselessly-strict new wording "not enough context to figure out the subject of the article". So hooray, admins are still deleting them anyway, but now they're lying about why; that's so much better.
A one-sentence draft about, as you'd expect, Brookburn Primary School. Wouldn't be deleteable in mainspace, because we're stupid about schools for historical reasons. Unambiguously not a test.
Content was "'''hi i am [personal name omitted]'''ℳ". (The name had nothing to do with the article name.) Best fit was an A3 attempt to communicate. A7 also more defensible than G2.
Content was "Airline-dest-list". Not at all clear what this was, or even that it was wholly useless; it was created by an editor who's made lots of contribs to airline-related articles, and who was still active at the time of tagging. Better would have been to ask him wtf it was intended to be (the only mention of it on his talk page is the twinkle speedy notification) instead of just tagging G2 right away.