This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.

• Name of article: (link) 2001 New York Yankees season
• Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I am a yankee fan so it caught my interest

Guiding questions

• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes it does
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? It think the lead does a good job of describing the whole article
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? I think it is concise

Guiding questions

• Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes
• Is the content up-to-date? Yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no
• Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Guiding questions

• The article seems like it is neutral and doesnt favor one side.

Guiding questions

• Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
• Are the sources current?
• Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
• Check a few links. Do they work?

Guiding questions

• Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
• Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
• Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes

Guiding questions

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
• Are images well-captioned?
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Guiding questions

• What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
• How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
• How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Guiding questions

• What is the article's overall status?
• What are the article's strengths? gives lots of stats
• How can the article be improved?
• How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

• Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~~~~

• Link to feedback: