You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
 | Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
Head, B. W. (2007). Community engagement: participation on whose terms?. Australian journal of political science, 42(3), 441-454.
It is a peer reviewed scientific article ,so it should be a reliable source. I covers the topic very well so it should be a notable source
Edit this section to compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.
| Examples:
|
The text is quite long and dense. Breaking it down into smaller paragraphs or using bullet points for different approaches can make it easier to read and navigate. While the text mentions various aspects of community development, providing real-world examples or case studies could help illustrate how these approaches are implemented in practice. Some sections could benefit from more concise and clearer explanations. Avoiding repetition and unnecessary jargon can help make the text more accessible to a wider audience. Including interactive elements like questions, prompts, or calls to action can engage readers more effectively and encourage them to think about how the principles of community development apply to their own contexts. It might be helpful to identify and emphasize key takeaways or main messages within the text to ensure that readers grasp the most important aspects of community development.
Click on the edit button to draft your outline.
| Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |
You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
| Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
Head, B. W. (2007). Community engagement: participation on whose terms?. Australian journal of political science, 42(3), 441-454.
It is a peer reviewed scientific article ,so it should be a reliable source. I covers the topic very well so it should be a notable source
Edit this section to compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.
| Examples:
|
The text is quite long and dense. Breaking it down into smaller paragraphs or using bullet points for different approaches can make it easier to read and navigate. While the text mentions various aspects of community development, providing real-world examples or case studies could help illustrate how these approaches are implemented in practice. Some sections could benefit from more concise and clearer explanations. Avoiding repetition and unnecessary jargon can help make the text more accessible to a wider audience. Including interactive elements like questions, prompts, or calls to action can engage readers more effectively and encourage them to think about how the principles of community development apply to their own contexts. It might be helpful to identify and emphasize key takeaways or main messages within the text to ensure that readers grasp the most important aspects of community development.
Click on the edit button to draft your outline.
| Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |