From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive link for 2006-03-19T04:26:43Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2007-11-02T12:13:38Z
(diff)
More on methods of interpretation
Is this a Freudian test ?
Rohrschach, not Rorschach !
SPOV (the Swiss point of view)
The Ro(h)rschach name Discussion
NPOV in controversy section
Pronounciation of Rorschach
Keeping the inkblots secret
Archive link for 2007-11-02T12:22:44Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Ultraexactzz
Summary: "fix'd archive link, removing additional archived material (through July 31 2007), moving misplaced comments, noting the archive "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2007-11-14T10:18:32Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:LKirkby
Summary: "/* Copyright */ should be own section "
Sections removed:
Serious ethical problem: heads in the sand
Archive link for 2008-02-27T19:19:42Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Hmwith
Summary: "/* Straw poll on the inkblot image */ (to gain consensus) "
Sections removed:
Straw poll on the inkblot image
Archive link for 2008-02-27T19:22:18Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Hmwith
Summary: "/* Straw poll on the inkblot image (to gain consensus) */ make it all one section, put a&b, gray, made your vote just say 1 once (if you don't mind) "
Sections removed:
Image should not be hidden & there should be no disclaimer
Archive link for 2008-03-03T10:20:39Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2008-03-03T15:49:00Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Fredrick day
Summary: "this is not a talkpage and any comments not related to the article subject can and will be removed - I seem to have attracted a "fan" and frankly I'd rather not encourage them. "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2008-03-03T17:38:54Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2008-03-04T02:00:03Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Bryan Derksen
Summary: "archiving some of the older material "
Sections removed:
Deeper reasons for Rorschach inkblot test controversy
"Bibliometric" data on Exner
Current situation appropriate
Should the image of the first pic of the Rorschach inkblot test be hidden?
We could have a consensus here if.....
Another problem with posting the picture
Please come to a consensus
Even the International Rorschach Foundation themselves are showing all ten images on the web
Comment by 207.160.240.251
Archive link for 2008-03-07T23:49:40Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Dela Rabadilla
Summary: "/* Outrageous straw man for the straw poll */ "
Sections removed:
The image is already public
Archive link for 2008-03-14T04:33:09Z
(diff)
Copyright Issues regarding Images
Question on Reaching Resolution
Rationale and Scope for Image Display
Serious ethical problem: heads in the sand
Pronunciation of Rorschach
The question of the display of the picture and Wikipedia Censorship
Harmfulness of image publication.
RfC: Should Original Rorshach test inkblot be replaced
Original research objection
Not the same information objection
No harm is produced objection
Already in other websites objection
Click [show] (or here) to view the first card in the test (may invalidate the test).
Removal of reference to Society for Personality Assessment
why is there an image hidden in breach of policy on NPOV, discliamer, censorship etc?
Straw poll on the inkblot image (to gain consensus)
Wikipedia Guideline Review
Poll: Who is willing to go to mediation?
Archive link for 2009-03-22T20:36:04Z
(diff)
A more general discussion ?
What about the article itself ?
Outrageous straw man for the straw poll
The image is already public
What is next on mediation
Case for not showing the original inkblots
Case for showing the original inkblots
Rorschach Images have been in public domain for 50 Years
It is wikipedia policy to remove images arbitrarily
psychopathy is not psychosis
Location of the inkblot image
Archive link for 2009-04-26T03:18:31Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-04-28T22:37:28Z
(diff)
A more general discussion ?
What about the article itself ?
Outrageous straw man for the straw poll
The image is already public
What is next on mediation
Case for not showing the original inkblots
Case for showing the original inkblots
Rorschach Images have been in public domain for 50 Years
It is wikipedia policy to remove images arbitrarily
psychopathy is not psychosis
Archive link for 2009-05-06T00:08:13Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Chillum
Summary: "/* section break */ "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-05-06T00:25:41Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Ward3001
Summary: "/* Analysis of discussion */ better heading "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-05-06T00:38:35Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Chillum
Summary: "/* Chillum's analysis of discussion */ "
Sections removed:
Chillum's analysis of discussion
Archive link for 2009-05-06T14:40:42Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Chillum
Summary: "several people are interpreting the discussion now, not just me "
Sections removed:
Chillum's analysis of discussion
Archive link for 2009-05-06T21:49:26Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Faustian
Summary: "/* What is Consenus? */ "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-05-25T13:18:15Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Page break */ change header name to "arbitrary" break "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-05-27T22:41:42Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Faustian
Summary: "/* New consensus is disputed */ "
Sections removed:
New consensus is disputed
Archive link for 2009-05-28T01:16:44Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* May or may not be new consensus */ 3L "
Sections removed:
May or may not be new consensus
Archive link for 2009-05-29T13:09:45Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "cutting content from a few threads inactive since 22 may & prior & archived to
Talk:Rorschach test/Archive 5 . I have left headers in place with pointers. if anything still needs discussed, copy a comment or two back here and continue from there "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-05-29T13:25:11Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* May or may not be new consensus */ not really needing a 3L here. "
Sections removed:
May or may not be new consensus
Archive link for 2009-06-04T15:47:58Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Chillum
Summary: "This is the topic of at least half the thread "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-06-08T12:53:50Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "some more archiving to further reduce the load of this talk page "
Sections removed:
summary of method section, please
Archive link for 2009-06-09T19:08:10Z
(diff)
Location of the inkblot image
RFC: Top Image - Hermann Rorschach or first card of the Rorschach inkblot test?
Interpretation of discussion
Other pages with controversial images
New consensus has emerged
Archive link for 2009-06-11T15:05:14Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Chillum
Summary: "(irony) "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-06-16T15:13:16Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* The ten inkblots of the Rorschach inkblot test */ subsec "
Sections removed:
The ten inkblots of the Rorschach inkblot test
Archive link for 2009-06-16T15:21:39Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Page protected */ subsec "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-06-17T13:33:45Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "chrono move to move past the gallery and page protected note, re to renaissancee "
Sections removed:
Publish all 10 argument #01 - The cat's out of the bag
Publish all 10 argument #02 - No evidence of harm
Archive link for 2009-06-17T13:37:39Z
(diff)
Publish all 10 argument #01 - The cat's out of the bag
Publish all 10 argument #02 - No evidence of harm
Archive link for 2009-06-17T13:50:35Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Arguments concerning the inclusion of all 10 images */ let's keep this all under one subsec "
Sections removed:
Arguments concerning the inclusion of all 10 images
Archive link for 2009-06-17T14:46:51Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-06-18T03:47:42Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "1L no longer necessary "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-06-18T04:24:03Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "archiving conversations inactive since june 3... left placeholders "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-06-19T01:31:59Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Jmh649
Summary: "/* =Include */ "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-06-19T01:32:12Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Jmh649
Summary: "/* Do not include= */ "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-06-19T03:45:38Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Faustian
Summary: "/* Include */let's make these options absolutely clear "
Sections removed:
Include in a Dropdown box
Archive link for 2009-06-19T23:55:03Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Danglingdiagnosis
Summary: "/* Use show/hide mode for Rorschach Test inkblots? */ "
Sections removed:
Including all 10 Argument #5
Archive link for 2009-06-20T15:36:07Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "removing header refs to consensus review and transcluded addendum, seems we've moved beyond that, archiving a thread with no comments since june 6 "
Sections removed:
Too much James M. Wood, M. Teresa Nezworski, Scott O. Lilienfeld et al?
Archive link for 2009-06-21T01:06:11Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Bob K31416
Summary: "/* Inkblots: In a drop down box versus Not in a drop down box */ "
Sections removed:
Inkblots: In a drop down box versus Not in a drop down box
Archive link for 2009-06-21T07:07:26Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "See
WT:CON#Ethical . The word "ethical" did not appear until March 23, 2009. I've removed it as it appears to have been slipped in there without any discussion as to the propriety of the expansion in the scope of the policy. "
Sections removed:
Inkblots: In a dropdown box versus Not in a dropdown box
Archive link for 2009-06-21T21:57:47Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Bob K31416
Summary: "format Technical and Harm sub-sections "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-06-23T06:48:15Z
(diff)
Argument Con #2 - Interfering with the work of a health professional
Archive link for 2009-06-23T15:48:07Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* #02 - No evidence of harm - arb break */ subsec "
Sections removed:
#02 - No evidence of harm - arb break
Archive link for 2009-07-02T06:13:30Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Danglingdiagnosis
Summary: "/* Argument Con #1 - It may harm a psychologists ability to protect the welfare of his patient. "
Sections removed:
Argument Con #1 - It may harm people
Archive link for 2009-07-04T15:08:18Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "archiving no comments since june 27 "
Sections removed:
#02 - No evidence of harm - arb break
#06 Argument Pro - It doesn't matter if we publish. The test is nearly worthless anyway.
Archive link for 2009-07-04T15:23:20Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "archiving no comments since june 23 "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-04T22:09:04Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "removing some old archive pointers, split section on harm into new L2. archiving no conversations since june 23 "
Sections removed:
Custody & patrole hearings
How many inkblot images / Discussion about consensus
Preference Versus Compromise Regarding the :Image: The Evidence
And now for something completely different...
Archive link for 2009-07-06T18:56:44Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Comments from others */ section ran long, breaking off "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-06T19:00:46Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:DreamGuy
Summary: "/* Comments from regulars */ heading in general not helpful, responses to person not understanding NPOV policy "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-06T19:06:04Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* RFC: Should the potential for harm to result inform our editorial decisions regarding encyclopedic content? */ re-add heading without "from regulars" as it now was under "points of order" tweaking header further down "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-10T03:04:10Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Jmh649
Summary: "/* #06 Argument Pro - It doesn't matter if we publish. The test is nearly worthless anyway. */ "
Sections removed:
#06 Argument Pro - It doesn't matter if we publish. The test is nearly worthless anyway.
Archive link for 2009-07-10T12:25:43Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-07-13T20:20:06Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Tanao
Summary: "/* The ten inkblots of the Rorschach inkblot test */ "
Sections removed:
The ten inkblots of the Rorschach inkblot test
Archive link for 2009-07-13T20:40:08Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "talk page needs another good haircut, but this will have to do for now. "
Sections removed:
Include Not In a Dropdown box
Include in a Dropdown box
Inkblots: In a dropdown box versus Not in a dropdown box
Archive link for 2009-07-13T20:46:52Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Are all 10 inkblots really necessary? */ archiving, no comments since july 7 "
Sections removed:
Examples of the three types of inkblots
Archive link for 2009-07-14T03:50:04Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Arguments Con */ trying out a subpaged discussion style, all involved editors for any of the 1-6 arguments con discussions please watchlist
Talk:Rorschach test/2009-06 Arguments Con . some portions will be transcluded here for ease of use "
Sections removed:
Argument Con #1 - It may harm a psychologist's ability to protect the welfare of his/her patient.
Argument Con #2 - It violates Wikipedia policy
Argument Con #3 - It interferes with the workings of another profession
Argument Con #4 - It violates Wikipedia policy on
neutrality .
Archive link for 2009-07-14T04:02:25Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Superceded? */ strike that, :Someone has taken the RFC tag down. I think Dangling should incorporate the opinions of the people who respond to this RFC and try to make a more refined policy proposal after this one closes.
Chillum
04:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC) "
reply
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-14T04:37:54Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "trimming the TOC a bit with ; headers instead of === under a section ==Recently archived discussions== "
Sections removed:
Use show/hide mode for Rorschach Test inkblots?
Including all 10 Argument #5
New expert sign-up section
Reverting, status quo, and survey re inkblots
An informal survey for the inclusion of the 10 inkblots
list of reliable sources mentioned here
We need an image of the test being administered
Are all 10 inkblots really necessary?
False inkblot as the lead image
Is source for inkblots reliable?
Archive link for 2009-07-14T04:51:46Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "moving "Superceded?" to points of order, trim toc a bit "
Sections removed:
The ten inkblots of the Rorschach inkblot test
Recently archived discussions
Archive link for 2009-07-14T20:59:14Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:209.167.232.100
Summary: "/* #04 - removing the images amounts to censorship */ "
Sections removed:
#04 - removing the images amounts to censorship
Archive link for 2009-07-14T21:35:28Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Streissand effect */ sp "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-14T23:46:47Z
(diff)
#01 - The cat's out of the bag
#02 - No evidence of harm
#04 - Removing the images amounts to censorship
#05 - Reputable organizations have been showing the images, too
#06 Argument Pro - It doesn't matter if we publish. The test is nearly worthless anyway.
Archive link for 2009-07-15T01:31:23Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:85.180.98.233
Summary: "/* #06 Argument Pro - It doesn't matter if we publish. The test is nearly worthless anyway. */ "
Sections removed:
#06 Argument Pro - It doesn't matter if we publish. The test is nearly worthless anyway.
Archive link for 2009-07-15T01:31:52Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:85.180.98.233
Summary: "/* #06 It doesn't matter if we publish. The test is nearly worthless anyway. */ "
Sections removed:
#06 It doesn't matter if we publish. The test is nearly worthless anyway.
Archive link for 2009-07-15T01:41:17Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Chillum
Summary: "Now that we actually have something new, this can be its own section "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-15T04:37:18Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Chillum
Summary: "new stuff goes at the end "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-15T12:27:59Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "ironic that you feel your opinion is the most important. new comments at the bottom please. organization is chronological, norbased on signifncance. "
Sections removed:
The importance of having a leg to stand on
Archive link for 2009-07-15T12:33:51Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* The importance of having a leg to stand on */ combine related "
Sections removed:
The importance of having a leg to stand on
Archive link for 2009-07-15T18:05:34Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Jmh649
Summary: "/* Proposal policy by Danglingdiagnosis */ "
Sections removed:
Proposal policy by Danglingdiagnosis
Archive link for 2009-07-20T14:22:57Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "archiving no comments since july 13 "
Sections removed:
Are there any new arguments?
Archive link for 2009-07-20T14:31:03Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* RFC: Should the potential for harm to result inform our editorial decisions regarding encyclopedic content? */ tweak "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-20T15:20:09Z
(diff)
#01 - The cat's out of the bag
#02 - No evidence of harm
#04 - Removing the images amounts to censorship
#05 - Reputable organizations have been showing the images, too
#06 - It doesn't matter if we publish. The test is nearly worthless anyway.
Archive link for 2009-07-20T15:48:37Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "archiving no comments since 16 july "
Sections removed:
Proposed policy by Danglingdiagnosis
Archive link for 2009-07-20T15:49:09Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Proposed policy by Danglingdiagnosis */ didn't mean to L3 this "
Sections removed:
Proposed policy by Danglingdiagnosis
Archive link for 2009-07-20T16:06:05Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "combine related threads, archiving no comments since july 12 "
Sections removed:
Picture of Hermann Rorschach
Archive link for 2009-07-23T15:15:19Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "fmt "
Sections removed:
Response from SPA/ISR Representative
Archive link for 2009-07-23T15:29:21Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "relieving pressure on the table of contents "
Sections removed:
How many kicks at the can?
Inline citation for inkblots needed
A note to the newly arrived editors
Propose moving "removed the inkblot" debate to a sub page
Archive link for 2009-07-23T15:37:34Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "RFC was a bit of a non-starter, i'm going to go ahead and withdraw it a bit early "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-23T15:39:08Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "fix "
Sections removed:
A request to the regulars regarding the below RFC
Archive link for 2009-07-23T15:54:55Z
(diff)
Argument for general disclosure of testing materials (after an appropriate time)
Response from SPA/ISR Representative
Sub-pages: policy and arguments
Archive link for 2009-07-23T15:56:04Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Recently archived discussions */ rm section, no longer really necessary. consult archives if you need to "
Sections removed:
Recently archived discussions
Archive link for 2009-07-23T16:38:34Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "relieving pressure on the table of contents "
Sections removed:
data on scientific status
A new look at old arguments
Archive link for 2009-07-25T17:54:18Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Ward3001
Summary: "/* More misinformation */ restored my comment to it's appropriate subsection, inexplicably moved by Chillum. If I placed someone else's comments in a wrong subsection; no idea why Chillum moved. "
Sections removed:
Discussion of recent additions
Archive link for 2009-07-25T18:18:23Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "re ward - on the greater good ... moving header above my comment/ useful conversational break ,suggest mediation "
Sections removed:
Discussion of recent additions
Archive link for 2009-07-25T18:29:57Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Discussion of recent additions */ split "
Sections removed:
Discussion of recent additions
Archive link for 2009-07-25T18:31:54Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Perhaps Citizendium could help? */ link
Citizendium "
Sections removed:
Perhaps Citizendium could help?
Archive link for 2009-07-25T18:56:00Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "tweaking the top business... archiving two conversations, no comments since july 16th. "
Sections removed:
RFC: Should the potential for harm to result inform our editorial decisions regarding encyclopedic content?
Image of Hermann Rorschach
Proposed policy by Danglingdiagnosis
Completely unrelated, but...
A Consideration on Harm, Protection of Test Materials, and the Use of the Images in Question
Comments from a designated representative
A compromise informing the reader about health concerns.
Archive link for 2009-07-25T20:05:53Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-07-28T12:47:26Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* =Formal mediation declined */ fix arb break header "
Sections removed:
Formal mediation declined
Archive link for 2009-07-29T02:15:02Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:70.231.247.220
Summary: "/* Interesting piece from the NYTs */ NYTs -> NYT "
Sections removed:
Interesting piece from the NYTs
Archive link for 2009-07-29T03:23:05Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-07-30T02:49:15Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-07-30T14:19:25Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "archiving mostly no comments since july 25 "
Sections removed:
Clarification About the Rules of this Debate
General agreement to move the inkblot debate to a subpage
Archive link for 2009-07-30T14:29:12Z
(diff)
An ER Doctor is not a Pyschologist
Archive link for 2009-07-30T18:14:31Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Ward3001
Summary: "/* thx!!!!!!!! */ removed garbage per
WP:TALK "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-30T22:14:16Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:LjL
Summary: "None "
Sections removed:
Recently moved image discussions
Archive link for 2009-07-30T23:53:40Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:LjL
Summary: "None "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-07-31T01:09:27Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Recently moved image discussions */ trim "
Sections removed:
RFC: Should the potential for harm to result inform our editorial decisions regarding encyclopedic content?
A Consideration on Harm, Protection of Test Materials, and the Use of the Images in Question
A compromise informing the reader about health concerns.
Comments from a designated representative
Archive link for 2009-07-31T01:17:02Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "archiving, no comments since 25 july "
Sections removed:
Archiving unhelpful sections?
Discussion of recent additions
Archive link for 2009-07-31T01:17:47Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "chrono move "
Sections removed:
Utterly cool-headed correction
Archive link for 2009-07-31T01:28:11Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "i think this is about over "
Sections removed:
Formal mediation declined
Archive link for 2009-07-31T01:29:43Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "moving stale section (no pun intended), leaving subsection behind as new L2 as non-image related "
Sections removed:
Improving the criticism section
Archive link for 2009-07-31T19:03:14Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "chrono move "
Sections removed:
But I studied the test! Why did I fail?
Archive link for 2009-07-31T20:14:14Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-08-03T19:20:51Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Jmh649
Summary: "/* Inclusion of inkblots in article in other languages */ "
Sections removed:
Inclusion of inkblots in article in other languages
Archive link for 2009-08-03T22:26:37Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-08-03T23:37:46Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:86.159.191.14
Summary: "
← Replaced content with 'get a life, losers' "
Sections removed:
Recently moved image discussions
Recently archived discussions
Interesting piece from the NYT
Improving the criticism section
no such word as administrating
An ER Doctor is not a Pyschologist
Irrevocable Harm to Authors/Dangerous Precedent
The scholar papers challenging it.
Utterly cool-headed correction
What happened to my comment?
The world supports the addition of these images (reason number 7 I think)
But I studied the test! Why did I fail?
multiple similar examples exist in medical field
Professional complaints will occur
Stray copyright arguments
Archive link for 2009-08-06T00:33:02Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Chillum
Summary: "please revert me if I am wrong, but this seems to be a thread of its own, not a subthread "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-08-06T17:31:27Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:SlimVirgin
Summary: "removing personalized commentary "
Sections removed:
Doctor is held to higher standard
Archive link for 2009-08-06T21:12:35Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "369kb so I must do some trimming, archiving some conversations and move one to image subpage "
Sections removed:
Interesting piece from the NYT
Improving the criticism section
no such word as administrating
An ER Doctor is not a Pyschologist
Irrevocable Harm to Authors/Dangerous Precedent
Archive link for 2009-08-07T12:54:02Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "/* Images */ better header "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-08-08T06:52:44Z
(diff)
Recently moved image discussions
Recently archived discussions
The scholar papers challenging it.
Utterly cool-headed correction
What happened to my comment?
The world supports the addition of these images (reason number 7 I think)
multiple similar examples exist in medical field
Appreciating Conflicting Ethics
Edit filter to prevent image removal
Archive link for 2009-08-10T06:56:44Z
(diff)
But I studied the test! Why did I fail?
Archive link for 2009-08-11T07:04:01Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Hroðulf
Summary: "changed headings /* Prior exposure */ replied "
Sections removed:
Archive link for 2009-08-11T16:16:50Z
(diff)
Removed by:
User:Xeno
Summary: "miszabot is handling archiving now, this won't be kept u-t-d "
Sections removed:
Recently moved image discussions
Recently archived discussions
Archive link for 2009-08-12T07:08:53Z
(diff)
The world supports the addition of these images (reason number 7 I think)
multiple similar examples exist in medical field
Archive link for 2009-08-12T21:50:03Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-08-13T07:09:49Z
(diff)
Utterly cool-headed correction
Additional Perspective - Hope to Move Forward
Another suggestion for compromise
Edit filter to prevent image removal
Another compromise section
Archive link for 2009-08-14T07:07:40Z
(diff)
Archive link for 2009-08-16T07:08:25Z
(diff)
Professional complaints will occur
Stray copyright arguments
Interesting piece on the Rorschach by a psychologist
Archive link for 2009-08-17T07:19:03Z
(diff)