![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Cblack1298
Link to draft you're reviewing
Hi Cblack1298. I'm kwelsh1103 and I'm peer reviewing your sandbox article. So far, your article is very definite to the topic. It defines what communication ethics with strong background context on the history of it. Your citations also work and are relevant to the information at hand. The only thing I would recommend as of today is more of a visual input. A picture of communication ethics being held or practiced can raise your article to new heights.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
Cblack1298
Link to draft you're reviewing
Hi Cblack1298. I'm kwelsh1103 and I'm peer reviewing your sandbox article. So far, your article is very definite to the topic. It defines what communication ethics with strong background context on the history of it. Your citations also work and are relevant to the information at hand. The only thing I would recommend as of today is more of a visual input. A picture of communication ethics being held or practiced can raise your article to new heights.