Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).
Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.
This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.
PART 1
When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.
1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.
Answer:
First, we need to encourage new editors to stay on Wikipedia. If we are harsh with new editors, there's a strong chance we'll drive them away. New editors bring new expertise, interests, and skills. Also, given that all editors will only be active on Wikipedia for a finite time, having a flow of new editors keeps Wikipedia going. Being harsh to new editors will drive them away and we won't get those benefits of new editors. Additionally, if a user is judging an article based on notability guidelines, and assumes bad faith, they will not likely take an objective view of the article. Assuming good faith helps keep us objective about the quality of articles.
2. In your own words, how does notability is defined in Wikipedia?
Answer:
Notability is defined as the subject being covered in an in-depth manner in multiple reliable sources not directly associated with the subject of the page. For people and events, this coverage also has to be lasting. Different subjects also have more specific guidelines to help determine if a subject is notable, in addition to the general guideline.
3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?
Answer:
Strictly defined, I would argue that How to change a car tire would pass the general notability guideline, but would run afoul of other policies. There is in-depth coverage in multiple sources not directly associated with the subject matter. This is why we have WP:NOT. The proposed article would be incompatible with WP:NOTHOWTO, and, depending on how exactly the article was written, would be at especial risk for WP:OR issues. This is an example of why we have guidelines in addition to the bare notability one.
4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?
Answer:
Subject-specific notability criteria provide more specific guidelines to help editors assess the notability of articles within certain subjects, while the GNG guideline provides a general approach to notability. Each of the subject-specific notability guidelines gives the criteria for inclusion in that section - for instance, WP:NASTRO has a very detailed list of what is considered to be an astronomical object. The SNGs should be used as a clarifier for the GNG. As an example, I've seen an article deleted at AfD despite a marginal pass of WP:NFOOTY (he played one minute in a qualifying match) due to a wholly comprehensive GNG fail. I would recommend using the appropriate SNG for patrolling an article. A strong pass of the SNG guidelines almost certainly demonstrates notability, but marginal cases (like the above-mentioned soccer player) should be judged by GNG.
5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?
Answer:
The sports-specific notability guideline and WP:CRYSTAL would both suggest that the article would be notable. The sports-guideline indicates that the Olympic Games would be notable, and WP:CRYSTAL requires that the event be notable (demonstrated by WP:NOLY) and almost certain to occur (much planning for the '24 Olympics had been done by '19). Obviously the article would fail the Wikipedia:Verifiability without sources, but the concept would be notable. The main concern would be if the unsourced information was legitimate knowledge and planning or just personal speculation (in the last case, the bad content would need to be removed). The notability guideline for events would also suggest notability.
6. A New York city based 2019 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.
Answer:
Fail - raised capital notices are considered to be trivial coverage by
Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).
Fail - Fails
WP:CORPDEPTH, capital transactions are not considered to be substantial coverage.
7. Movsar Evloev who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 12-0.
Answer:
Pass - The mixed martial arts sections of
Wikipedia:Notability (sports) states that MMA fighters need to have at least 3 matches in top-tier leagues. The UFC is such a league, and Evloev has more than 3 fights.
Pass - Passes WP:NMMA criteria number one, as WP:MMATIER considers the UFC to be a top-tier MMA organization and Evloev surpasses the minimum number of fights requirement.
8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2020 and to be released on August 2021 in the cinemas.
Answer:
Fail - has not entered production yet, and would likely not pass the
Wikipedia:Notability (films) SNG until its public release unless something makes the production itself notable.
Fail per
WP:NFF. Has not yet entered principal photography, and depending on the situation, may not be notable until the production has been released (depends on the amount of coverage the production process garners).
9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2020 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.
Answer:
'Fail per
Wikipedia:Notability (people). Has not held an elected office, and has not received substantial coverage.
Fail - fails both criteria of
WP:NPOL (the local coverage doesn't seem to be enough to meet the standard of "significant press coverage").
10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2019 and his songs are listed in Spotify.
Answer:
Fail - does not appear to meet any of the twelve bullet points at the musicians section of
Wikipedia:Notability (music).
Fail - Fails all twelve parts of
WP:MUSICBIO.
11.
Carlos Alós-Ferrer
Answer:
Appears to meet at least three of the criteria for
Wikipedia:Notability (academics).
Passes
WP:NACADEMIC. To me, it appears he passes subcriteria 1, 4, 5, and 8, but I'm super familiar with some of the terms in higher academic posts.
12.
Alistair Overeem
Answer:
Easily passes the MMA section of
Wikipedia:Notability (sports), and his ADCC European Championship in the infobox probably demonstrates notability, too.
Passes
WP:NMMA criteria one, as he has fought more than three fights in a top-tier MMA organization. Also passes
WP:NKICK as he won the K-1 world championship.
13.
Jennifer Lopez
Answer:
Overwhelmingly meets the criteria for musicians and ensembles at
Wikipedia:Notability (music).
Passes most of the criteria at
WP:MUSICBIO (appears to be all but 6 and 9). Also meets
WP:ENT criteria number one.
14. Three Mile Island accident
Answer:
Passes
Wikipedia:Notability (events) - Subject of in-depth, lasting coverage from a wide geographic scope.
Meets the criteria of WP:LASTING, WP:GEOSCOPE, WP:INDEPTH, WP:PERSISTENCE, and WP:DIVERSE.
15. Persepolis
Answer:
Passes
Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) through passage of
WP:GEOLAND by being a former legally recognized populated places and
WP:GEOFEAT as having been assigned the status of a feature of cultural heritage and the historical importance of it.
Meets
WP:GEOLAND #1 (former populated places count) and
WP:GEOFEAT #1 as a recognized historically important site.
Hog Farm. See assignment 1 above. Ping me here if you need to clarify anything. If you make an edit for an answer then pls provide the hist diff (in all assignment). Ping me when you have finished answering the questions. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 03:18, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Topic | Explanation | 5 Examples | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|
Reliable source | A source that is both independent from the subject, reasonably free from bias, with a reputation for accuracy, and publishing provable facts, not opinions. They should either be from peer-reviewed or other sources with editorial oversight or written by a recognized subject-matter expert. |
|
![]() |
User generated sources | Source in which the content is produced by individual users with limited editorial oversight or fact-checking beyond that provided by the community. |
|
![]() |
Non Independent source | A source that is closely related to its subject. These sources often have issues with neutrality and objectivity and may not always publish factual information. |
|
![]() |
Type | Explanation | Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary) | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|
Primary | Works produced very close to an event or by figures directly involved with the event. Experimental data results are also primary sources, and when dealing with fiction, the fictional works in which the topic appears are primary. Religious scriptures (The Bible, the Qur'an, etc.) |
|
![]() |
Secondary | Sources removed from the event or subject that analyze primary sources |
|
![]() |
Tertiary | Sources which collect information from secondary sources in order to provide an overview of the sources, not to provide additional analysis |
|
![]() |
Subject | Primary | Secondary | Tertiary | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|---|
Example: Art | Example:Sculpture | Example:Article critiquing the sculpture | Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor | |
History | Robert E. Lee's letters | Shelby Foote's The Civil War: A Narrative | Lee's entry in an encyclopedia | ![]() |
Science | Raw data from a recently-published experiment | Another scientist's analysis of said data | A freshman-level college biology textbook | ![]() |
Athletes | George Brett's stats | An ESPN article about Brett's involvement in the Pine Tar Game | Brett's entry the the Baseball Register | ![]() |
Answer: Content claimed needs to be verified so that it can be proved that the content is neutral and accurate. This also ensures that Wikipedia remains a tertiary source and does not analyze material itself.
Answer: Wikipedia is a user-generated source, and as a result can only be used in a limited, self-referencing (describing what Wikipedia claims itself to be) manner.
Answer: One of my primary source examples above, Grant's Personal Memoirs, will work here. Grant's autobiography is generally considered reliable and accurate (although like all autobios, there are a few disputable points). However, since it was written by the subject of the work, it is not independent.
Answer: I recently ran into a source in a GA review that was a blog discussing the Sacred Chickens of Rome (yes, that was a real thing with the ancient Romans). The author was obviously independent from the Roman government and their chickens. However, it was unreliable because the author of the blog is not a recognized subject matter expert and it was a personal website.
David Howell Petraeus AO ( /pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, [1] until his resignation on November 9, 2012 [2] after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported. [3]
Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008), [4] a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands. [5]
In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the
fall of Baghdad
[6]
[7]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: The sources that contribute to GNG demonstrate that Petraus passes WP:NSOLDIER (general) and WP:NPOL (head of the CIA).
Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player. [1] She won five Grand Slam singles titles. [2] Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000. [3] She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships, [4] which led to a two-year suspension from the sport. [5]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
[3] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: The sources that we can use to determine notability demonstrate a pass of WP:NTENNIS through her participation in the main draw of the Grand Slam.
Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan. [1] [2] Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture." [3] This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home. [4]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://franklloydwright.org/work/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: The sources that count towards notability indicate a pass of all four parts of WP:ARCHITECT.
Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. [1] Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA. [2] He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation. [3]
At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor. [4] In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy. [5] Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.bafta.org/wales | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
{{
cite web}}
: |archive-date=
requires |archive-url=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url=
(
help)
Answer: None of the sources are of the quality to produce notability, so neither WP:DIRECTOR or WP:ACTOR are met.
Sonny William Williams (born 3 August 1985), who is a Muslim [1], is a New Zealand All blacks rugby union footballer, [2] Williams was a Marist Saints junior when he was spotted playing in Auckland by Bulldogs talent scout John Ackland. [3] In 2002 he was offered a contract and moved to Sydney (as the youngest player to ever sign with an NRL club) to play in the Bulldogs' junior grades. [4]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: The notability-contributing source demonstrates passage of the first two parts of WP:NRU. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
"Can't Stop This Thing We Started" is a song by Canadian singer and songwriter Bryan Adams. The song was written by Adams and Robert John "Mutt" Lange, and was the second single from Adams' 1991 album Waking Up the Neighbours where by the song was nominated for Grammy Award 1992 "Song of the Year" [1]
Weekly charts
Chart (1991-1992) | Peak position |
---|---|
US Mainstream Rock ( Billboard) [2] | 2 |
Denmark ( IFPI) [3] | 2 |
US Billboard Hot 100 [4] | 2 |
| class="col-break col-break-2" |
End-of-year charts
End-of-year chart (1991) | Position |
---|---|
Canada Top Singles (RPM) [5] | 3 |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The New York Times article | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Billboard Mainstream Rock Chart | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Top 10 Denmark | ? Hard to judge a deadlink | ? Can't really judge the quality of a deadlink | ? Since the link is dead, I don't know if Adams is addressed or not | ? Unknown |
Billboard Hot 100 Chart | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
RPM | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: Passes WP:NSONG #1, by charting on multiple significant music charts, although this does not always indicate notability. Does not pass WP:NSONG #2, as it was only nominated and did not win. Since WP:NSONG is not 100% conclusive here, I'm going to have to cop out and say WP:GNG pass.
Kamlesh Bhatt is a Solution Architect and a DevOps Engineer living in Singapore. I am a fan of technology, music, and entrepreneurship. He is interested in photography and travel. He could be reached at his blog and youtube channel.
[1]
[2]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh-bhatt-45392961/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check |archive-url=
value (
help)
Answer: Fails all parts of WP:ANYBIO and WP:ARCHITECT. I'd consider this one to be a WP:A7 candidate. None of these sources can be used to produce any claim to notability.
Hog Farm, See assignment 2 above. Let me know if you need any assistance. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 04:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Hannibal Barca was a Carthaginian general and statesman who is widely considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (264–241 BC). [1] [2] [3]
References
Answer:The title should be changed to "Hannibal", since reliable sources refer to the subject by the mononym and Hannibal appears to be the primary topic - add a hatnote to a dab page at the top to distinguish from other Hannibals per WP:COMMONNAME, although "Hannibal (general)" would also be acceptable per WP:PARENDIS.
Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr. (born August 14, 1959) is an American retired professional basketball player and former president of basketball operations of the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played point guard for the Lakers for 13 seasons. [4] [5] [6] [7]
References
Answer: The name is acceptable per
WP:COMMONNAME. Johnson is referred to in reliable sources as "Magic", not "Earvin", so the article title is correct.
Conor Anthony McGregor (born 14 July 1988) is an Irish professional mixed martial artist and boxer. His is a former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) featherweight and lightweight champion. [1]
On 15 August 2019, TMZ Sports published a video that appeared to show McGregor punching a man at The Marble Arch Pub in Dublin. [2] The incident happened on 6 April and was originally reported by Irish media, although without the video that showed the attack. Irish police stated in April that they had opened an investigation. [3] McGregor was charged with assault and first appeared in court on 11 October 2019. [4] [5] [6]
In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son, Clodagh. Murray bedded McGregor in 2017 at his hotel after the Aintree Grand National just four weeks bofore McGregor's girlfriend Dee Devlin gave birth to their son.
References
Answer: The first paragraph is acceptable, as a neutral and accurate lead. The second paragraph is cited with multiple reliable sources, and is the proper tone (stating that he has been charged, not that he committed the crime) per
WP:WELLKNOWN. The final paragraph is unacceptable per
WP:V,
WP:WELLKNOWN, and
WP:BLPNAME.
Diana Nyad (née Sneed; born August 22, 1949) is an American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer who lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. and could be contacted at +0-202-456-6213. [1] Nyad gained national attention in 1975 when she swam around Manhattan (28 mi or 45 km) and in 1979 when she swam from North Bimini, The Bahamas, to Juno Beach, Florida (102 mi (164 km)). In 2013, on her fifth attempt and at age 64, she became the first person confirmed to swim from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage, swimming from Havana to Key West (110 mi or 180 km). [2]
References
Answer: The inclusion of the subject's address and phone number is unacceptable per
WP:BLPPRIVACY and should be quietly removed and reported to oversighters for possible REVDELing. The rest should be acceptable per
WP:WELLKNOWN, although if this is all that's in the article, describing the subject as an author, journalist, or motivational speaker would need a citation to pass
WP:V.
Answer- Explanation: I'm getting an error message for the exact URL that just sends me to the website homepage, but the context suggests that it would probably be acceptable for use on Wikipedia.
Answer - link/guideline: Images produced by the US government or US government employees as part of their official duties are considered to be in the public domain per Wikipedia:Public_domain#US_government_works.
Answer- Explanation: Yes, use of this image would be acceptable.
Answer - link/guideline: The website states that the images are all in the public domain, and according to the website's listing in
WP:PDI, this classification as public domain can be relied upon.
Answer- Explanation: Use of this image would be acceptable.
Answer - link/guideline: [ [5]] indicates that the license it is licensed under allows for such use.
Answer- Explanation: No. Use of this
Answer - link/guideline: Fails WP:IMAGERES - Too high of resolution. Fails WP:NFCI #8, as the image would likely only be used for decorative purposes, as it is not the key resembler of any set style. Especially, use of the image of a commercial sculpture would fail the example at WP:NFCI#UUI #12 and #16.
P;lease read WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFF. Point out the WP:NPOV words/phrases and rewrite the paragraph on Question 9 & 10 from a neutral point of view.
Answer: POV phrases - "brilliant", "rare and exceptional beauty," "destroyed", "talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate."
Rewrite - She is a boxer, who turned pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight. In this fight, which occurred on December 14, 2013, she defeated her opponent in 20 seconds. She fought under XXX promotion on her next fight in February 2014.
Answer:
POV phrases: "popular, acclaimed" (we'd need a citation to prove that RS consider him to be acclaimed), "who loves by all who watched his films", "tender, innocent."
Rewrite - He is a Bulgarian actor. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry at the age of 14. He has featured in 44 films.
Answer:Just because content is verifiable doesn't mean it's worthy of inclusion. Inserting extreme minority viewpoints or trivial negative details in a BLP can hijack the article. Giving extremely minor viewpoints equal weight in an article reduces neutrality and factual accuracy and should be avoided.
Answer:For one thing, it falls against Wikipedia's stated purpose - to build an encyclopedia. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a tertiary source, and tertiary sources build off of secondary sources. The original research is a primary source, and it would have to be discussed in a secondary source before an encyclopedia could pick it up. Also, original research fails WP:RS as the content has no editorial oversight.
Answer: As an editor, it is not appropriate to insert your own original research or opinions. However, it is appropriate to insert the original research of others (if the guidelines for using primary sources are followed) and the opinions of subject-matter important figures can be included if properly attributed so that it's clear that the opinion is the opinion of the cited figure. For instance, Tucker Carlson's opinions on matters of US politics can be included, but only if attributed to Tucker Carlson.
Answer:
(Disclaimer: I have absolutely no idea who this figure is, but he seems to be a leader to some degree in Islam, so he is probably a subject matter expert on Islamic law).
According to, (Insert title and name I don't remember), Islamic law requires clothing for below the waist to be loose, not see through, and to cover the private areas. (and a citation would be inserted here).
According to Sh. Shady Alsulieman, Islamic law requires clothing to be loose or baggy, not see through, not of such a color as to attract attention to the clothing, and to cover the wearer's private areas.
“ | Islam demands Islam commands us with our with regards of our clothing for both men and women, our clothing must be first of all baggy, so must be loose with a men or women. It must non see-through whether men or women. It must non colorful attractive that means when someone walks everyone's looking at them. [1] | ” |
References
Answer: WP:V requires us to use the information provided by reliable, independent sources, so we would have to stick with the figure of two sons in that case. The figure of three, although accurate, is not supported by reliable sources, so we would have to stick with the other figure in this case.
Hog Farm see Assignment 3 above. Best.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 02:24, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
PART 2
No | Criterion | Application | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|
1 | G1 | For patent nonsense, which is strictly defined as content that is incomprehensible. | ![]() |
2 | G2 | Test pages - usually pages marked as test in either the content or the edit summary. | ![]() |
3 | G3 | Vandalism and hoaxes. However, subtle hoaxes should be taken to AfD. | ![]() |
4 | G4 | Content that is "substantially similar" to content that was previously deleted in a deletion discussion. | ![]() |
5 | G5 | Content created in violation of a ban or block - only content created after the sanctions apply (this is usually through a sock) | ![]() |
6 | G6 | Uncontroversial housekeeping - things such as redirects in the way of page moves, deleting templates after TfD, etc. | ![]() |
7 | G7 | The author and only substantial contributor requests deletion in good-faith or blanks the page. | ![]() |
8 | G8 | Pages that depend on a page that no longer exists - Talk pages of deleted pages, subpages with no parent page, etc. | ![]() |
9 | G9 | Decisions by the Wikimedia Foundation office. | ![]() |
10 | G10 | Pages that only serve the purpose of attacking the subject | ![]() |
11 | G11 | Unambiguous spam | ![]() |
12 | G12 | Blatant copyright violations, in which simply removing the violations would leave basically nothing left. Also, all versions of the page need to qualify (revisions can be deleted through revdel). | ![]() |
13 | G13 | Drafts that have not been edited by a human in six months. | ![]() |
14 | G14 | Disambiguation pages that don't disambiguate anything. | ![]() |
No | Criterion | Application | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|
1 | A1 | Articles without enough context to tell what it's talking about. | ![]() |
2 | A2 | Non-English article present somewhere else on the Wikimedia. | ![]() |
3 | A3 | Articles with no substantive content - only links, tags, images, etc. | ![]() |
4 | A5 | Articles that have completed the transwiki process | ![]() |
5 | A7 | Articles about people, bands, clubs, individual animals, organizations, websites, or events that do not signify why the subject is significant in a credible manner. | ![]() |
6 | A9 | Articles about musical recordings that do not signify importance and where the musician does not have an article. | ![]() |
7 | A10 | Recently created articles that duplicate content existing in another article. | ![]() |
8 | A11 | Articles about subjects that are obviously the products of the article creator, and do not indicate significance. | ![]() |
9 | R2 | Cross-namespace redirects that do not go to the template, category, wikipedia, help, or portal namespaces. | ![]() |
Answer i: Design Cafe
Answer ii: Terrell on Advertising
Answer iii: Law Payne
Answer iv: Malovec-Studios I.N.C
Answer v: History of Hair Metal Music
Answer:
A page is nominated for G12 when removing the copyright violations would leave nothing worth saving and consist of the page's entire history. REVDEL is used when the page is savable: content other than the COPYVIOS exists, and the page history is not completely ruined.
Answer:
A copyright violation is the use of another's copyrighted intellectual work without permission. Copyright violations do not have to be exact matches of the work, very close, but slightly different reproductions can also be copyright violations. It's like trespassing or theft, but with intellectual property instead of physical property.
Answer i: Properly cited direct quotes.
Answer ii: The article uses material from sources within the public domain
Answer iii: Materials that have gone through the formal donation process
Answer: This conduct is illegal, and infringes upon the rights of others. There are times when what looks like a violation is lawfully taking places - use of public domain materials, etc. When in doubt, go through the copyright violation revdel request, and an administrator can delete the infringing revisions.
Answer i:
Kodava cuisine
Answer ii: Baron Raymonde
Answer iii:
Voon Lee Shan
Answer iv:
St.Stephens Orthodox Cathedral kudassanad
Answer v:
Gaulstown, County Westmeath (Later recreated in a proper way, but the copyright violation version was speedily deleted)
Answer i: List of German exonyms for places in Italy - G4
Answer ii: Ronald Reagam - R3
Answer iii: Joey Daser - G4
Answer iv: Afghanai (disambiguation) - G14
Answer v: Angelina Green - G4
Answer: Sometimes, newly created articles are produced about subjects that would warrant an article, but are far from being ready for the articlespace. These articles can be moved to the draftspace and the remaining CNR nominated for R2. However, reviewers moving pages to the draftspace should make sure at least an hour has elapsed since the last major edit to the article, to make sure the article is in its complete state.
Answer i: Present NFL season - A10
Answer ii:
Gabriel Finch - A7
Answer iii:
Omar Alaa Mubarak - A7 (Deleted per A7 as requested, later recreated, so it may be a bluelink if it hasn't been redeleted by the time you see this.)
Answer iv: Khai Dreams - A7 (musician)
Answer v: ಕಹಳೆ - A2
Answer: There are certain red flags to this. The greatest of which is first-person pronouns, article written including "I" and "we" are almost certainly either COI/PAIDs or copied and pasted off a website somewhere. Long-winded sections of puffery or promotion on an organization or person's page are red flags for this. Also, sometimes editors give away COIs in the edit summaries. Other COI or paid editors will be kind enough to identify themselves as such on the talk page.
Answer:
The user should first get a message on their talk page linking to the project pages about editing with a COI. If it's a new editor, giving them the welcome message with the Five Pillars of Wikipedia might be helpful. The article/user should noted on the COI noticeboard. The nature of the article might determine what needs to be done with it. Blatant spam can be G11'd, and autobiographies that demonstrate no credible claim to importance can be A7'd. If it looks like the subject might be notable, it might be helpful to see if an unrelated user would be interested in improving the article if it was temporarily moved to draftspace.
13. Please read
WP:PAID. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a paid editor?
Answer:First, the user should get a message on their talk page pointing them to the paid editor guidelines. WP:PAID states that the article can be taken to either the administrator's noticeboard for incidents or the COI noticeboard. Personally, I feel like the COI noticeboard would be the better target, it would only be drastic enough to take it to ANI if this is a long-term problem. Then, the article should be checked to see if it meets any of the CSD, and if not, either moved to the draftspace to see if an unrelated editor wants to improve it, or sent through the deletion process (AfD probably better than PROD here).
Hog Farm See Part 2 - Assignment 4 above. Assignment 4 and 5 are the hardest assignment in the program. Do read through CSD carefully as high successful CSD rate is requirement to pass the program. Please set up your CSD log, add CVredel, install Earwig copyvio check and bookmark the URL as well. Let me know if you need any help. Best. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 03:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Notes:
G11 (promo) - What constitute a G11? At times it is hard to define. Although if a article is blantly promote or adverstise about the subject then it is a G11. Sometimes, the it is a little subtle and that would be a judgement call. As a rule of thumb, if article about an entertainers (actor/singer/DJ/artist and etc) in dept of how hard they work, how motivated they are, using all the puffery/flowery languagues and especially the subject does not meet notability guidelines. For a corporation, we would see they list down all they product/services, their directors/key person in the company, they mission, their client, they are the influencer in their industrial, all the words/phrased to enhance/market the company and no substantial info that is supported by independent reliable sources.
G12 (copyvio) -
Copyright violation addresses the use of original expression without permission of the holder which is a violation of laws even the credit is given to the source. For articles, the Copyright Law gives the copyright protection to the “original works of authorship fixed in in a tangible medium of expression” in the newspaper, magazine and freelance article at the moment of their creation, for the life of the creator plus 70 years after, and 95 years for corporation publication or 120 years from date of creation, whichever is shorter.
A “fact” is not considered an original work of authorship; but how the ways facts are recorded where the style of the writing, choice and/or arrangement of words are copyrightable. An infringement of copyright is committed when a person uses the “exact words /almost exact words in a consecutive manner” of the author/holder. To note, as a guideline, a few words copies from the original works and an idea of expression such as "weather the storm", 'crossing the Rubicon" "as dead as a doornail" and etc. proper nouns, document/event/treaty/person/title/ names are generally acceptable and so is a direct quote of speech. However, any longer phrases which would be expression in a number of ways are copyright protected. To use one of two short sentences on a large article generally is ok but it will considered infringement if the edit entry is consists of big percentage of the original work and yet for some (such as newspaper/press/journalism that takes their work very seriously - anything more than 4 exact consecutively words would considered copyvio). To avoid copyright infringement, one needs uses his/her own words to convey the source’s information. Paraphrasing could minimise the the copyright violation; however, "threshold" ultimately, court judgement would determined the if copyright violation has been made.
Copyvio for texts or images shared the same notion that it is not a copyvio if the verbatim texts or images are taken from free licence and Public domain sites/specific page/image. I have indicated to you on Assignement 3 - section 3.3 - Q5, Q6, Q7 that always check the "original source" even if in WikiCommon the editor who upload the image claim taken from a PD site, we need to check the link provided and if the site indicate the image taken from another source, then we check the source. For texts, we need to check the sites if it is a PD, sometimes the disclaimer of PD is not on the page, but on the home page or "about" page or FAQ page. Secondly, for older article (no in NPP Feed), any copyvio texts found, we will revdel it as it is almost always it is not the first versions. If a small amount of verbatim texts found in NPP Feed articles, we would revdel them; but large amount of verbatim texts we will tag G12.
Lastly, here are a few examples where the German car maker Audi was sued for copyright breach.
1. Audi infringed copyright violation over Eminem’s song “Lose Yourself” in their commercial advertising. [7]
2. Audi was fined US $ 965,000 over copyright infringement for using 10 words from Brian Andreas’s story of “Angel of Mercy” - [8]
I think I just had a wake-up call, and it was disguised as a car, and it was screaming at me not to get too comfortable and fall asleep and miss my life. (Audi commercial) Some people don’t know that there are angels whose only job is to make sure you don’t get too comfortable & fall asleep & miss your life.(Brian Andreas’ print)
Hope the above help. Note the above doest not substitute the Wikipedia links I provided above. Please make sure you read the reading material as well. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 17:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Spot COI / PAID
COI editors are permitted to edit Wikipedia and create on the affected articles; however, it is "HIGHLY DISCOURAGE/NOT RECOMMENDED as it is very difficult for the COI editors to write the article/input info into the affected article in [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view}}.
1.Use person pronouns and possessives (I, we, my, our) 2.Multiple references to company, financial listings, staff lists, interviews, own publication, press release, blog and with clean references 3.Well written prose 'too perfect to be true' and only with single/2 edits 4.Editors have created multiple company related articles 5.Editors disclosed their COI/PAID in their userpage (not tag with COI disclose), or disclosure when they ask question in WP:Teahouse, WP:Help Desk, WP:AFCHD or receivers' talk pages.
In assignment 4, we look at articles which fits in WP:Criteria for speedy deletion (CSD) where by the the articles are deleted within a few hours to 24 hours from the time of the nomination. In Assignment 5, we discuss the what actions should be taken for those articles do not fit under the CSD criteria but do not meet relevant criteria for content of the encyclopedia.
Please read
WP:PROD,
WP:BLPPROD,
WP:MERGE,
WP:DRAFTIFY,
WP:NPPDRAFT and
WP:REDIR,
WP:AFD and answer the following questions. (Provide links and hisdiff where they are applied.)
Answer: PROD is meant for pages and files that don't quite meet the criteria for speedy deletion, but whose deletion would be considered uncontroversial. For PROD, a WP:BEFORE search should be conducted to make sure that the subject really is non-notable, not just a badly-written page. PROD is also only usable for articles that have not been PRODed before, have not been discussed at AFD at any point, and have not been undeleted. Deletion discussions can be costly in editor time, so PROD is designed to have a means for uncontroversial deletions without creating a deletion discussion.
Answer: A WP:BEFORE search should be conducted to ensure that the subject is truly non-notable, and that it isn't just a badly written page on a notable subject. If it is thought that the deletion could be controversial, go the AFD route instead. Additionally, the page history should be checked to make sure the bad version of the page isn't a vandalism or spam hijack and to make sure that the article meets the PROD qualifiers listed in the question above.
Answer: The criteria for BLPPROD is that the article is about a living person, and that the page contains no references of any form. If the BLPPROD route is not chosen, there are several options. If the article is eligible for standard PROD, that route can be used. Additionally, the article can be taken to AFD for a full deletion discussion. In special circumstances, such as a figure that is clearly notable, but the article is not fully compliant with WP:BLP due to insufficiency of references, the page can be draftified.
Answer: AFD is for articles that likely do not meet the guidelines for articles ( WP:GNG, WP:NEO, etc.) but whose deletion may be controversial. A WP:BEFORE search should be conducted, as notability is judged on the existence of sources, not on the state of the article. If the WP:BEFORE search indicates that even with full source usage, the article won't meet policy, then it should be listed at AFD. There's a manual process for the listing, but it's much easier with Twinkle.
Answer: Seven days for PROD or BLPPROD (unless declined). For AfD, the basic time frame is seven days, although WP:SNOW deletes can go quicker, and AfDs are often relisted if the consensus isn't clear, so AfDs can sometimes last a few weeks.
Answer: If after a WP:BEFORE search, notability still doesn't show up, nominate the article for WP:AFD.
Answer: PROD is for uncontroversial deletions that meet certain criteria, if the criteria are not met, or the deletion is viewed to be possibly controversial, PROD is not the right call, and AFD is better. BLPROD has very strict criteria, if those criteria are met, then BLPROD can be used. If a deletion is potentially controversial, then AFD should be the route used.
Answer:If an article does not meet the notability requirements, but has good content (reliably sourced), and the article content would make a valid section in another article, it can be merged. WP:PAGEDECIDE allows a decent amount of space for editor consensus for a merge. For instance, if content is only really understood in the context of another article, it may be best to merge.
Cassiopeia( talk) 05:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Answer:
Answer:If a page appears to have been created by a COI or paid editor, it should be moved to draftspace. Otherwise, articles can be moved to draftspace when the article subject appears to have some merit, the article is far from meeting the relevant article standards, and the article is not undergoing active improvement (like with CSD, give it awhile after creation before draftifying).
Answer 1: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Metroid - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. Only coverage I could find was either in unreliable sources like fan wikis or in articles like "top 10 cheats on how to beat the Queen Metroid".
Answer 2: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irony Bribe Article was about a WP:NEOLOGISM that a WP:BEFORE indicated was only used in one article, and had no to little widespread usage.
Answer 3: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs recorded by Jacob Collier - Redundant content fork of content best handled at already existing pages.
Answer 4: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin Ross (2nd nomination) - Fails the SNG WP:NGRIDIRON by not playing in an actual NFL game. Coverage was mostly in unreliable sources or of a nature such as transactions and signing to his college team that fail WP:GNG.
Answer 5: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernoulli-Doppler-Leidenfrost-Peltzman-Sabir-Whorf-Dunning-Kruger-Stroop effect - Fails WP:GNG and may be a joke.
Answer 1: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Patterson (American football) - Voted to delete. Comprehensive GNG fail and also failed the American football SNG diff of !vote
Answer 2: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physics Post - WYU - No clear claim to significance, and the subject appears to be referring to a Facebook page, of which reliable secondary sources don't exist. diff of !vote
Answer 3:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Thompson (politician) - Failure of GNG and the
WP:NPOL SNG.
diff of !vote
Answer 4: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nassau Junction, Missouri - Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND diff of !vote
Answer 5: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 NFL Draft - WP:TOOSOON. The only thing set about this event is the location. The dates aren't even known yet, there's just too little known about this event to be able to write a non- WP:OR article on this subject. dif of !vote
Answer 1: Wallis Lane - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBAND by a very large margin, could have possibly been a speedy, but a WP:BEFORE search turned up a slight claim to importance, but not near notability standards.
Answer 2:
Kindergarten Forest Hill in Bellingham Green - Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NORG. Almost no kindergarten-only schools are notable.
Answer 1: Leszek A Gasieniec - Newly created biography of a living professor, with no citations provided. Article was a microstub and the person may not meet WP:NACADEMIC, so went for PROD instead of draftification.
Answer 2:
Beili Liu - Living person, claim to significance, no references or external links provided.
(2) The version of Beili Liuhen you BLPROD was correct but now they tag was removed and sources are added. (do provide the hist diff of your PORD/BLPROD or etc (everything) next time) Cassiopeia( talk) 05:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Answer 1: Frank Kmet moved to Draft:Frank Kmet. Article about a living person with one source (not eligible for BLP PROD), but overall insufficient sourcing. Moved to draftspace to allow for additional citations to be provided and creator notified on their user talk page.
Answer 2: You and Me (2011 film) moved to Draft:You and Me (2011 film). Unsourced article about a film. I don't read Iranian, so I couldn't determine if the article would be notable or not. Anyway, since it had no references, it wasn't ready for the mainspace, so moved to draftspace.
Answer 3:
List of Telugu film actresses -
diff of nomination @
Cassiopeia: - Did I do that right?
Hog Farm (
talk) 04:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Answer 4: ETO - SZESE Győr FKC - diff of nomination. Hopefully this one doesn't get removed by the page creator like the Telugu film actresses one did.
Notes:
In this assignment we look at tagging pages for problems. There any many tags available in Wikipedia and we will look at some of them here.
Please read WP:TAGGING and answer the questions below. Please provide explanation in your own words and provide hist diff when applicable.
Answer:
To alert users that an article needs worked on in some way(s). For instance, users who enjoy copy editing can go through the category of pages tagged for needing a copyedit, and then work on those issues.
Answer:
Adding a tag to an article when the problem isn't obvious without explaining on the talk page the rationale behind the tag. This is discouraged.
Answer:
Answer:
When either the problem has been fixed, or the problem is no longer applicable. Unless removing the tag is a cut-and-dry issue, then the tag removal should be explained on the talk page.
(pls provide links)
i. Answers: Tagged Cornelius Atherton as unreferenced. Notified User:Adin-Atherton. Diffs of [10] (tag) and [11] (notify user)
ii. Answers: Tagged
2020 EFL Championship play-off final as unreferenced. Notified
User:Brianludden05. Diff of
[12] for tag and diff of
[13] for notification
iii. Answers: Tagged
Achola Rosario as orphan. Diff of
[14] Notified
User:Sandra Aceng, diff of
[15]
iv. Answers: Tagged
Riskee And The Ridicule for notability-music. Doesn't seem to meet the music notability guidelines, but I don't know a whole lot about UK punk rock, so I'll just tag it and let an expert in that subject matter deal with it. Diff of tag
[16] Diff of notify
[17]
v. Answers: Tagged
Rukh-Shana Namuyimba as needing more citations. Diff of notify of
[18], diff of tag of
[19]
vi. Answers: Tagged
Zhongshan West railway station as unreferenced. Diff of tag of
[20] Diff of notify of
[21]
vii. Answers: Tagged PIP2 domain as needing more citations. Diff of tag of [22], diff of notify of [23]
viii.Answers: Tagged
Forest meditation as unreferenced. Diff of tag of
[24]. Diff of notify of
[25]
ix. Answers: Tagged
Line 4 (Naples) as unreferenced. Diff of tag of
[26], diff of notify of
[27]
x. Answers: Tagged Gomolo as unreferenced. diff of tag of [28]. Diff of notify of [29]
i. Answers:
Even Financial. Added two sub sorter. Diff of
[30]
ii. Answers:
Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations. Added three sub sorts. Diff of
[31]
iii. Answers:
Scandium perchlorate - Added one sub sort. Diff of
[32]
iv. Answers:
1982–83 Utah Utes men's basketball team - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[33]
v. Answers:
Curio muirii - Added one stub sort. diff of
[34]
vi. Answers:
4-Methylenedioxy-4-imidazoline - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[35]
vii. Answers: John Craig (economist) - Added one stub sort. Diff of [36]
viii.Answers:
Marty Goddard - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[37]
ix. Answers:
Andrea Young - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[38]
x. Answers:
Najmi Ahmad - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[39]
i. Answers: Added three categories to Manuela Furlan (typo, changed one in the next edit). Diff of [40].
ii. Answers: Added
Category:Lists of firearms to
List of firearms (A) Diff of
[41]
iii. Answers: Added
Category:Lists of firearms to
List of firearms (R) Diff of
[42]
iv. Answers: Added
Category: Santa Barbara County, California to
Camino Cielo. Diff of
[43]
v. Answers: Added one category to
Sidi Harazem Bath Complex. Diff of
[44]
vi. Answers: Added one category to
Avraham Moshe Bonhart. Diff of
[45]
vii. Answers: Added three categories to
Riskee And The Ridicule, diff of
[46]
viii.Answers: Added three categories to
Rukh-Shana Namuyimba. Diff of
[47]
ix. Answers: Added one category to
Zhongshan West railway station Diff of
[48]
x. Answers: Added
Category:Lipids to
PIP2 domain. Diff of
[49]
i. Answers: Rated
List of firearms (A) for two projects. Diff of
[50]
ii. Answers: Rated
List of firearms (R) for two projects. Diff of
[51]
iii. Answers:
Najmi Ahmad - Rated for three projects. Diff of
[52] (created the talk page with this edit, so no great diff for this)
iv. Answers:
Mohammed Hussain Nasrallah - Rated for two projects. Diff of
[53]
v. Answers:
2020 EFL Championship play-off final - Rated for three projects. Diff of
[54]
vi. Answers:
Princepal Singh - Rated for two projects. Diff of
[55]
vii. Answers: 1906 Chicago Physicians and Surgeons football team - Rated for one project. Diff of [56]
viii.Answers: Ivankivtsi, Ternopil Hromada - Rated for one project. Diff of [57]
ix. Answers: Lâm Sơn - Rated for one project. Diff of [58]
x. Answers: Cosmos and History - Rated for two projects. Diff of [59]
i. Answer: Added "Italian rugby union player" to Manuela Furlan. Diff of [60]
ii. Answer: Added "Jewish religious leader" to
Gershon Edelstein. Diff of
[61]
iii. Answer: Added "River in Bhutan" to
Pho Chhu Diff of
[62]
iv. Answer: Added "Kenyan record label" to
WeOwnFire Diff of
[63]
v. Answer: Added "Fútsal club in Barrio Obero, Asunción, Paraguay" to
Corrales FBC. Diff of
[64]
vi. Answer: Added "Indian martial artist and self-defense trainer" to
Cherupalli Vivek Teja. Diff of
[65]
vii. Answer: Added "American IndyCar Series racing team to
Citrone/Buhl Autosport. Diff of [
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Citrone%2FBuhl_Autosport&type=revision&diff=962284465&oldid=962284142
viii. Answer: Added "Diplomatic relations between Malta and the European Union to
Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations, diff of
[66]
ix. Answer: Added "Australian professional golfer" to
George Serhan, diff of [
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=George_Serhan&type=revision&diff=962791612&oldid=962790396
x. Answer: Added "Canadian ambassador" to
Renata Wielgosz, diff of [
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Renata_Wielgosz&type=revision&diff=962791812&oldid=962791417
Hog Farm Apologies. See assignment 6 above. Cassiopeia( talk) 09:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Answer:
First, it's important to not jump to the conclusion that bad faith is going on unless they've given you a really obvious reason not to. At least in my view, registered users and IPs should be treated equally, except for the consideration that an IP may be shared, so more than one user (some of whom may be productive contributers) may be on that IP. If there's a disagreement going on, provide linked policy-based statements to support your view. If it gets to the point that a report needs to be filed against an obviously bad-faith user, then always provide diffs for evidence of the behaviors.
i. Answer: Assume that they're genuinely wanting to help the encyclopedia.
ii. Answer: Help inform them of small things you wouldn't think of in a non-put-downing way. For instance, it took me almost a week to realize that four ~ would sign signatures automatically for me, so I had to manually copy the syntax of other user's comments and look up UTC on my own for a week.
iii. Answer: Link to policies for them. New editor's aren't going to understand what notability is, for example.
iv. Answer: If you notice a new editor doing something particularly effective, give them a nice note on their talk page.
v. Answer: New users frequently use test edits in the article space. When reverting/warning, explain test edits and point them to the sandbox. Don't call test edits by new users vandalism, unless its blatant
vi. Answer: Communicate first. Many new editors will be making iffy edits through lack of experience. Don't just take them to AIV instantly.
vii. Answer: Don't be overeager with pushing deletion. Consider trying to fix the article first. For instance, if a new editor creates a BLP article with no sources, add a reliable source, instead of quickly BLP PRODding
viii. Answer: I've done a little bit of WP:UAA work. There's some users that will report anything borderline from a new users. It's generally less WP:BITEy to communicate with them on their talk page rather than just report them to UAA without thinking.
ix. Answer: Give them a friendly welcome. A friendly welcome soon after they start editing helps to make the place more friendly.
x. Answer: If they jump into complex tasks early, like AfD, and mess up, don't go after them for it unless it becomes a big problem. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Kind of Town was an AfD I opened early in my editing tenure, and it was a notable subject. Thankfully, I didn't get called incompetent for opening it, or otherwise I may have left.
i. Answer: Avoid sarcasm. It's really hard to interpret sarcasm in online text.
ii. Answer: Assume good faith
iii. Answer: When explaining things to new user, provide links to policies, so that the user can read and understand, instead of giving the impression that there's a cabal of who says what's acceptable and not
iv. Answer: When providing the links in iii., use full titles, not shortcuts/shorthand. Some of the jargon/shortcuts/shorthand is exclusively used on Wikipedia, so new users will find it incomprehensible.
v. Answer: Don't tag articles for deletion immediately after creation (except in extreme circumstances), give it awhile to see if it grows.
vi. Answer: Consider using personalized messages, rather than just using templates, particularly with some of the warning templates, which would freak out a new user.
vii. Answer: If an edit by a new user has an edit with broken syntax or another minor problem, go ahead and fix the problem, instead of reverting it
viii. Answer: Don't call something vandalism in an edit summary unless it really is vandalism.
ix. Answer: Don't call their work junk, or any other equivalent phrase.
x. Answer: Don't call them a sockpuppet/SPA/etc.
i. Answer: User:Usedwii diff
ii. Answer: User:Oroboros66. diff
iii. Answer: User:Radioguy85. diff
iv. Answer: User:Therealanswerwasnothing. diff
v. Answer: User:Kid275. diff
i. Answer: Revenge deletion nominations of articles you created/significant worked on. Don't attack the user or accuse them of a revenge nom. Instead, plainly and calmly use policy-based reasoning as to why the article/redirect/file is acceptable for Wikipedia. If you can't do that, then maybe the article isn't suitable after all
ii. Answer: Profanity. Just ignore it. I have a real-life job that involves me getting swore at a lot, so I'm use to just ignoring such language.
iii. Answer: Legal threats. Tactfully point the threatening editor to
Wikipedia:No legal threats and quietly contact an administrator for revision deletion of the threat. If the problem persists, the user may have to be reported to ANI.
iv. Answer: Accusations of being a single-purpose account. This has happened to me. Point out your varied work to them, maybe the user will find an area they're interested in. (Side note: the user who accused me turned out to be a SPA sockpuppet, although I did not accuse them of such).
v. Answer: Trolling. Don't feed the trolls. Quietly report to AIV, revert the edits (rollback is your friend), and maybe quietly list the page for protection if it gets really bad. Don't draw extra attention to them.
We reward Wikipedia editors for their hard work and due diligence by awarding them barnstars as a token of appreciation, encouragement and make its recipient feel good of their contributions. The choice of banstar given should be fair and appropriate, which will help prevent over-use. There are many different type of banstars, kindly read Wikipedia:Barnstars, Wikipedia:Personal user awards
i. Answer: User talk:Parsecboy - The Good Articles Barnstar. Diff of [67]. Very prolific editor at bringing articles to GA-status.
ii. Answer:
User talk:Sturmvogel 66 - The Writer's Barnstar. Diff of
[68]. Prolific article writer at
WP:MILHIST, a WikiProject I'm involved with
iii. Answer:
User talk:Gog the Mild - The Original Barnstar. Diff of
[69]. They helped me a lot in preparing an article I've been working on for it's ongoing FAC. I've been busy with the FAC, which is why progress here has been slow.
iv. Answer:
User talk:Djmaschek - The American Civil War Barnstar. Diff of
[70]. Excellent article writing.
v. Answer: User talk:Eddie891 - The Original Barnstar. Diff of [71]. Editor I've worked with several times who's running for RFA, I personally think they'd make a great admin.
Hog Farm pls see assignment 7 above. Stay safe and best.
Cassiopeia(
talk) 10:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
# | Tools | For / Functions |
---|---|---|
1 | Twinkle | Wikipedia gadget to assist common maintenance tasks |
2 | Hotcat | Wikipedia gadget to propose existing categories for auto-completion |
3 | Resource Request | Wikipedia help desk to locate content of printed books or form paywall sites |
4 | Google translate | Translation |
5 | Citation Tool for Google Books | Citation tool for Google books |
6 | Reverse Image Search | Reverse image serach |
7 | User:Interstellarity/CSD log | Your Criteria for speedy deletion log] |
8 | This is your AfD log | Your Article for Deletion log |
9 |
Earwig's Copyvio Detector via web
|
Copyvio detector tool |
10 | CV-revdel | Delete copyrighted content request |
11 | StubSorter user script. | Adding/removing stub tags |
12 | Rater user script | Adding, removing, or modifying WikiProject banners, including class and importance assessment |
13 | StubSorter user script | Adding stub class sorter |
14 |
Shortdesc helper script
Wikipedia gadget - Adding short description in the article | |
15 | Special:NewPagesFeed | Search new articles in Wikipedia |
16 | Copyvio Check | Displays the % of copyvio in a separate section of the info menu of the NPP toolset. |
17 | Superlinks | Quickly view pages and information related to the page they are currently viewing or editing without the need to navigate away form current page |
18 | NPP flowchart | NPP flowchart |
Hog Farm No home works for Assignment 8 - Just make sure you have all the tools which I have provided to you so far and know how to use them and when to use them.06:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012 | ![]() |
![]() |
? Not sure | ✘ No |
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
[72] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Offline source | ![]() |
can't access | can't access | ? Unknown |
[73] | ![]() |
Can't tell. Site is mostly code jibberish | ![]() |
✘ No |
[74] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
[75] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
[76] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[77] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[78] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://oh.sciencehistory.org/oral-histories/gottschling-daniel-e | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.gs.washington.edu/faculty/gottschling.htm | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.nasonline.org/member-directory/members/20024835.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.nasonline.org/programs/awards/molecular-biology.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://oxfordaasc.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195301731.001.0001/acref-9780195301731-e-35499 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Offline | ![]() |
![]() |
Can't access | ? Unknown |
https://www.sos.mo.gov/archives/history/historicallistings/molegc | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/33468412/deverne-calloway-obit/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://tam.missouri.edu/MHCTC/docs/suffrage/notable4.pdf | ![]() |
? Unclear if this is a student project or produced by university faculty | ![]() |
? Unknown |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2012/10/13/wakeman-school-memories-sought-as-closure-looms/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.adamsgs.uk/school-life/curriculum/history | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.ukgameshows.com/ukgs/All_Time_Winners_List | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-53860189 | ![]() |
![]() |
Piece doesnt' name contestant, so I can't tell if its about Fear or not | ? Unknown |
https://tabletennisengland.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/TTN/2002-03/May2003.pdf | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.nitrkl.ac.in/docs/Faculty/CV/1890547.pdf | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://iiitvadodara.ac.in/faculty/skp001.php | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=6vFfeb4AAAAJ&hl=en | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
http://www.thecomposerworks.com/news/jojo-gran-gran/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/proginfo/2020/11/jojo-and-grangran | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://inews.co.uk/culture/jojo-gran-gran-cartoon-celebrating%E2%80%94black-british-family-bonds-406058 | I'm getting an error code | I'm getting an error code | I'm getting an error code | ? Unknown |
https://melanmag.com/2020/03/17/jojo-gran-gran-cbeebies-tv-series/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.gbif.org/species/3390305 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://eol.org/pages/6592236/names | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://recetasdecocina.elmundo.es/2017/05/callos-madrilena-receta-casera.html | ![]() |
? I have no idea what this source is, and I don't read the relevant language | ![]() |
? Unknown |
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Lobel_s_Meat_and_Wine/fcMC0VCHZ9gC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Callos+a+madrilena&pg=PA207&printsec=frontcover | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Offline source | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't access source | ? Unknown |
https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Philippine_Cookbook/HUaDoUF0tRwC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA125&printsec=frontcover | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Philippine_Food_Cooking_Dining_Dictionar/STSWDwAAQBAJ | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't access relevant part | ? Unknown |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29565725 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.spottedbylocals.com/athens/loukanikos-graffiti/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://libcom.org/gallery/loukanikos-greek-anarchist-dog | ![]() |
? I'm honestly not sure, but it's not sigcov, so it doesn't matter | ![]() |
✘ No |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/groundbreaking-held-pocatello-idaho-temple | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://churchofjesuschristtemples.org/pocatello-idaho-temple/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Landis' Missouri Battery is my favorite I've written. Second Battle of Newtonia Site is my most recent.
Hog Farm See Assignment 9 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia( talk) 06:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC) Cassiopeia( talk) 06:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
While notability is the most important concept for a reviewer, communication is our most important responsibility. Communication takes a few forms for the NPP reviewer:
1. In your own words, why and how do communicate with the editor and why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE them?
2. What kind of sources are needed to demonstrate/contribute the notability of the subject? Why it is important?
3.What constitutes a
WP:COPYVIO? and why it is not a copyvio even the texts are identical the same as per sources?
4. What should we do when we encounter WP:COPYVIO article and what should we place on the COPYVIO editor's talk page?
5. What should we do when we encounter
WP:PAID article and what should we place on the PAID editor's talk page?
6. When do we nominated a page for WP:G12 and when do we WP:REVDEL the COPYVIO text?
7. What constitute an article is a WP:PROMO page? and what should do do when we encounter one?
8. Why do we tag a page? What are the normal tags we place in an article
9. When do we
WP:R2 a page?
10. When do we WP:PROD a page?
11. When do we
WP:BLPPROD a page?
12. When do we
WP:AfD a page?
13. Why it is important to
WP:CSD a page when the article fit the CSD criteria?
14. When do we decide to
WP:R2 /
WP:PROD /
WP:BLPPROD a page when the article has no source in it?
15. In your own words, list 5 things you have learnt from observing and participating in AfD.
Pls read WP:PROMOTION and WP:G11 and provide 5 successful CSD 11 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diff/links
Answer i:
Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and provide 5 successful CSD 12 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diff and I will check them at your CSD log. You can use Earwig's Copyvio Detector tool to check if an article is in violation of COPYVIO.
Answer i:
Pls read and A1-A11 and R2 at WP:CSD and and provide 5 successful "Article CSD" articles (with at least two of them are CSD A7) you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and hist diff.
Answer i: Thogaya.lk (A7 and G11) Can't access the diff since article is deleted, but it ought to show up in my CSD log.
1. Nominate 2 articles for WP:PROD and state your reasons.
2. Nominate 1 article for WP:BLPROD and state your reasons.
Answer i:
3. Pls read WP:R2 and WP:NPPDRAFT and provide 2 successful WP:R2 from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and hist diff.
Answer i:
1. Participate in 5 WP:AFD where by you are the first voter of the discussion. Please provide you reason either to delete, keep, redirect or merge.
Answer i: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow of a habit - Voted to redirect to musician's discography section. Non-notable album, can't find any significant coverage in RS, but it's a logical search term.
Nominate 5 articles for WP:AFD by using WP:Twinkle and provide explanation of your nomination.
Pls list 10 things needs to be considered/done when reviewing a page.'
Pls follow the NPP flowchart and read all the reading material provide from Assignment and tools 1-8 and answer the questions below. Please pick 5 articles that meet the notability guidelines (no PROD/BLPPROD/R2/AfD/CSD) from the new pages from Special:NewPagesFeed and follow the NPP flowchart and provide the appropriate answer below (pls place N/A if not applicable). Pick articles that have 3-4 sources for the exercises below. (pls provide link and hist diff)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Creating article
Please create an article in via Wikipedia:Articles for creation where by the subject is notable, the content adhere to all the requirement and appropriate tagging/labeling/linking as discussed from Assignment 1-8. Some notable subjects could be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/API Women.
Answer: Capture of Sedalia
Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).
Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.
This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.
PART 1
When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.
1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.
Answer:
First, we need to encourage new editors to stay on Wikipedia. If we are harsh with new editors, there's a strong chance we'll drive them away. New editors bring new expertise, interests, and skills. Also, given that all editors will only be active on Wikipedia for a finite time, having a flow of new editors keeps Wikipedia going. Being harsh to new editors will drive them away and we won't get those benefits of new editors. Additionally, if a user is judging an article based on notability guidelines, and assumes bad faith, they will not likely take an objective view of the article. Assuming good faith helps keep us objective about the quality of articles.
2. In your own words, how does notability is defined in Wikipedia?
Answer:
Notability is defined as the subject being covered in an in-depth manner in multiple reliable sources not directly associated with the subject of the page. For people and events, this coverage also has to be lasting. Different subjects also have more specific guidelines to help determine if a subject is notable, in addition to the general guideline.
3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?
Answer:
Strictly defined, I would argue that How to change a car tire would pass the general notability guideline, but would run afoul of other policies. There is in-depth coverage in multiple sources not directly associated with the subject matter. This is why we have WP:NOT. The proposed article would be incompatible with WP:NOTHOWTO, and, depending on how exactly the article was written, would be at especial risk for WP:OR issues. This is an example of why we have guidelines in addition to the bare notability one.
4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?
Answer:
Subject-specific notability criteria provide more specific guidelines to help editors assess the notability of articles within certain subjects, while the GNG guideline provides a general approach to notability. Each of the subject-specific notability guidelines gives the criteria for inclusion in that section - for instance, WP:NASTRO has a very detailed list of what is considered to be an astronomical object. The SNGs should be used as a clarifier for the GNG. As an example, I've seen an article deleted at AfD despite a marginal pass of WP:NFOOTY (he played one minute in a qualifying match) due to a wholly comprehensive GNG fail. I would recommend using the appropriate SNG for patrolling an article. A strong pass of the SNG guidelines almost certainly demonstrates notability, but marginal cases (like the above-mentioned soccer player) should be judged by GNG.
5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?
Answer:
The sports-specific notability guideline and WP:CRYSTAL would both suggest that the article would be notable. The sports-guideline indicates that the Olympic Games would be notable, and WP:CRYSTAL requires that the event be notable (demonstrated by WP:NOLY) and almost certain to occur (much planning for the '24 Olympics had been done by '19). Obviously the article would fail the Wikipedia:Verifiability without sources, but the concept would be notable. The main concern would be if the unsourced information was legitimate knowledge and planning or just personal speculation (in the last case, the bad content would need to be removed). The notability guideline for events would also suggest notability.
6. A New York city based 2019 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.
Answer:
Fail - raised capital notices are considered to be trivial coverage by
Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies).
Fail - Fails
WP:CORPDEPTH, capital transactions are not considered to be substantial coverage.
7. Movsar Evloev who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 12-0.
Answer:
Pass - The mixed martial arts sections of
Wikipedia:Notability (sports) states that MMA fighters need to have at least 3 matches in top-tier leagues. The UFC is such a league, and Evloev has more than 3 fights.
Pass - Passes WP:NMMA criteria number one, as WP:MMATIER considers the UFC to be a top-tier MMA organization and Evloev surpasses the minimum number of fights requirement.
8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2020 and to be released on August 2021 in the cinemas.
Answer:
Fail - has not entered production yet, and would likely not pass the
Wikipedia:Notability (films) SNG until its public release unless something makes the production itself notable.
Fail per
WP:NFF. Has not yet entered principal photography, and depending on the situation, may not be notable until the production has been released (depends on the amount of coverage the production process garners).
9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2020 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.
Answer:
'Fail per
Wikipedia:Notability (people). Has not held an elected office, and has not received substantial coverage.
Fail - fails both criteria of
WP:NPOL (the local coverage doesn't seem to be enough to meet the standard of "significant press coverage").
10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2019 and his songs are listed in Spotify.
Answer:
Fail - does not appear to meet any of the twelve bullet points at the musicians section of
Wikipedia:Notability (music).
Fail - Fails all twelve parts of
WP:MUSICBIO.
11.
Carlos Alós-Ferrer
Answer:
Appears to meet at least three of the criteria for
Wikipedia:Notability (academics).
Passes
WP:NACADEMIC. To me, it appears he passes subcriteria 1, 4, 5, and 8, but I'm super familiar with some of the terms in higher academic posts.
12.
Alistair Overeem
Answer:
Easily passes the MMA section of
Wikipedia:Notability (sports), and his ADCC European Championship in the infobox probably demonstrates notability, too.
Passes
WP:NMMA criteria one, as he has fought more than three fights in a top-tier MMA organization. Also passes
WP:NKICK as he won the K-1 world championship.
13.
Jennifer Lopez
Answer:
Overwhelmingly meets the criteria for musicians and ensembles at
Wikipedia:Notability (music).
Passes most of the criteria at
WP:MUSICBIO (appears to be all but 6 and 9). Also meets
WP:ENT criteria number one.
14. Three Mile Island accident
Answer:
Passes
Wikipedia:Notability (events) - Subject of in-depth, lasting coverage from a wide geographic scope.
Meets the criteria of WP:LASTING, WP:GEOSCOPE, WP:INDEPTH, WP:PERSISTENCE, and WP:DIVERSE.
15. Persepolis
Answer:
Passes
Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) through passage of
WP:GEOLAND by being a former legally recognized populated places and
WP:GEOFEAT as having been assigned the status of a feature of cultural heritage and the historical importance of it.
Meets
WP:GEOLAND #1 (former populated places count) and
WP:GEOFEAT #1 as a recognized historically important site.
Hog Farm. See assignment 1 above. Ping me here if you need to clarify anything. If you make an edit for an answer then pls provide the hist diff (in all assignment). Ping me when you have finished answering the questions. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 03:18, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Topic | Explanation | 5 Examples | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|
Reliable source | A source that is both independent from the subject, reasonably free from bias, with a reputation for accuracy, and publishing provable facts, not opinions. They should either be from peer-reviewed or other sources with editorial oversight or written by a recognized subject-matter expert. |
|
![]() |
User generated sources | Source in which the content is produced by individual users with limited editorial oversight or fact-checking beyond that provided by the community. |
|
![]() |
Non Independent source | A source that is closely related to its subject. These sources often have issues with neutrality and objectivity and may not always publish factual information. |
|
![]() |
Type | Explanation | Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary) | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|
Primary | Works produced very close to an event or by figures directly involved with the event. Experimental data results are also primary sources, and when dealing with fiction, the fictional works in which the topic appears are primary. Religious scriptures (The Bible, the Qur'an, etc.) |
|
![]() |
Secondary | Sources removed from the event or subject that analyze primary sources |
|
![]() |
Tertiary | Sources which collect information from secondary sources in order to provide an overview of the sources, not to provide additional analysis |
|
![]() |
Subject | Primary | Secondary | Tertiary | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|---|
Example: Art | Example:Sculpture | Example:Article critiquing the sculpture | Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor | |
History | Robert E. Lee's letters | Shelby Foote's The Civil War: A Narrative | Lee's entry in an encyclopedia | ![]() |
Science | Raw data from a recently-published experiment | Another scientist's analysis of said data | A freshman-level college biology textbook | ![]() |
Athletes | George Brett's stats | An ESPN article about Brett's involvement in the Pine Tar Game | Brett's entry the the Baseball Register | ![]() |
Answer: Content claimed needs to be verified so that it can be proved that the content is neutral and accurate. This also ensures that Wikipedia remains a tertiary source and does not analyze material itself.
Answer: Wikipedia is a user-generated source, and as a result can only be used in a limited, self-referencing (describing what Wikipedia claims itself to be) manner.
Answer: One of my primary source examples above, Grant's Personal Memoirs, will work here. Grant's autobiography is generally considered reliable and accurate (although like all autobios, there are a few disputable points). However, since it was written by the subject of the work, it is not independent.
Answer: I recently ran into a source in a GA review that was a blog discussing the Sacred Chickens of Rome (yes, that was a real thing with the ancient Romans). The author was obviously independent from the Roman government and their chickens. However, it was unreliable because the author of the blog is not a recognized subject matter expert and it was a personal website.
David Howell Petraeus AO ( /pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, [1] until his resignation on November 9, 2012 [2] after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported. [3]
Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008), [4] a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands. [5]
In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the
fall of Baghdad
[6]
[7]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: The sources that contribute to GNG demonstrate that Petraus passes WP:NSOLDIER (general) and WP:NPOL (head of the CIA).
Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player. [1] She won five Grand Slam singles titles. [2] Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000. [3] She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships, [4] which led to a two-year suspension from the sport. [5]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
[3] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: The sources that we can use to determine notability demonstrate a pass of WP:NTENNIS through her participation in the main draw of the Grand Slam.
Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan. [1] [2] Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture." [3] This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home. [4]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://franklloydwright.org/work/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://web.archive.org/web/20080302053743/http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: The sources that count towards notability indicate a pass of all four parts of WP:ARCHITECT.
Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. [1] Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA. [2] He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation. [3]
At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor. [4] In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy. [5] Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.bafta.org/wales | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
{{
cite web}}
: |archive-date=
requires |archive-url=
(
help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url=
(
help)
Answer: None of the sources are of the quality to produce notability, so neither WP:DIRECTOR or WP:ACTOR are met.
Sonny William Williams (born 3 August 1985), who is a Muslim [1], is a New Zealand All blacks rugby union footballer, [2] Williams was a Marist Saints junior when he was spotted playing in Auckland by Bulldogs talent scout John Ackland. [3] In 2002 he was offered a contract and moved to Sydney (as the youngest player to ever sign with an NRL club) to play in the Bulldogs' junior grades. [4]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7505117/2019-Rugby-World-Cup-Sonny-Bill-Williams-expecting-fourth-child.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://stats.allblacks.com/asp/Profile.asp?ABID=1108 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/warriors-league-team/news/article.cfm?c_id=360&objectid=10399308 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/01/1096527943523.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: The notability-contributing source demonstrates passage of the first two parts of WP:NRU. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:19, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
"Can't Stop This Thing We Started" is a song by Canadian singer and songwriter Bryan Adams. The song was written by Adams and Robert John "Mutt" Lange, and was the second single from Adams' 1991 album Waking Up the Neighbours where by the song was nominated for Grammy Award 1992 "Song of the Year" [1]
Weekly charts
Chart (1991-1992) | Peak position |
---|---|
US Mainstream Rock ( Billboard) [2] | 2 |
Denmark ( IFPI) [3] | 2 |
US Billboard Hot 100 [4] | 2 |
| class="col-break col-break-2" |
End-of-year charts
End-of-year chart (1991) | Position |
---|---|
Canada Top Singles (RPM) [5] | 3 |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
The New York Times article | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Billboard Mainstream Rock Chart | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Top 10 Denmark | ? Hard to judge a deadlink | ? Can't really judge the quality of a deadlink | ? Since the link is dead, I don't know if Adams is addressed or not | ? Unknown |
Billboard Hot 100 Chart | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
RPM | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
Answer: Passes WP:NSONG #1, by charting on multiple significant music charts, although this does not always indicate notability. Does not pass WP:NSONG #2, as it was only nominated and did not win. Since WP:NSONG is not 100% conclusive here, I'm going to have to cop out and say WP:GNG pass.
Kamlesh Bhatt is a Solution Architect and a DevOps Engineer living in Singapore. I am a fan of technology, music, and entrepreneurship. He is interested in photography and travel. He could be reached at his blog and youtube channel.
[1]
[2]
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://medium.com/@kamleshbhatt_ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kamlesh-bhatt-45392961/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
References
{{
cite web}}
: Check |archive-url=
value (
help)
Answer: Fails all parts of WP:ANYBIO and WP:ARCHITECT. I'd consider this one to be a WP:A7 candidate. None of these sources can be used to produce any claim to notability.
Hog Farm, See assignment 2 above. Let me know if you need any assistance. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 04:21, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Hannibal Barca was a Carthaginian general and statesman who is widely considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (264–241 BC). [1] [2] [3]
References
Answer:The title should be changed to "Hannibal", since reliable sources refer to the subject by the mononym and Hannibal appears to be the primary topic - add a hatnote to a dab page at the top to distinguish from other Hannibals per WP:COMMONNAME, although "Hannibal (general)" would also be acceptable per WP:PARENDIS.
Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr. (born August 14, 1959) is an American retired professional basketball player and former president of basketball operations of the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played point guard for the Lakers for 13 seasons. [4] [5] [6] [7]
References
Answer: The name is acceptable per
WP:COMMONNAME. Johnson is referred to in reliable sources as "Magic", not "Earvin", so the article title is correct.
Conor Anthony McGregor (born 14 July 1988) is an Irish professional mixed martial artist and boxer. His is a former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) featherweight and lightweight champion. [1]
On 15 August 2019, TMZ Sports published a video that appeared to show McGregor punching a man at The Marble Arch Pub in Dublin. [2] The incident happened on 6 April and was originally reported by Irish media, although without the video that showed the attack. Irish police stated in April that they had opened an investigation. [3] McGregor was charged with assault and first appeared in court on 11 October 2019. [4] [5] [6]
In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son, Clodagh. Murray bedded McGregor in 2017 at his hotel after the Aintree Grand National just four weeks bofore McGregor's girlfriend Dee Devlin gave birth to their son.
References
Answer: The first paragraph is acceptable, as a neutral and accurate lead. The second paragraph is cited with multiple reliable sources, and is the proper tone (stating that he has been charged, not that he committed the crime) per
WP:WELLKNOWN. The final paragraph is unacceptable per
WP:V,
WP:WELLKNOWN, and
WP:BLPNAME.
Diana Nyad (née Sneed; born August 22, 1949) is an American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer who lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. and could be contacted at +0-202-456-6213. [1] Nyad gained national attention in 1975 when she swam around Manhattan (28 mi or 45 km) and in 1979 when she swam from North Bimini, The Bahamas, to Juno Beach, Florida (102 mi (164 km)). In 2013, on her fifth attempt and at age 64, she became the first person confirmed to swim from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage, swimming from Havana to Key West (110 mi or 180 km). [2]
References
Answer: The inclusion of the subject's address and phone number is unacceptable per
WP:BLPPRIVACY and should be quietly removed and reported to oversighters for possible REVDELing. The rest should be acceptable per
WP:WELLKNOWN, although if this is all that's in the article, describing the subject as an author, journalist, or motivational speaker would need a citation to pass
WP:V.
Answer- Explanation: I'm getting an error message for the exact URL that just sends me to the website homepage, but the context suggests that it would probably be acceptable for use on Wikipedia.
Answer - link/guideline: Images produced by the US government or US government employees as part of their official duties are considered to be in the public domain per Wikipedia:Public_domain#US_government_works.
Answer- Explanation: Yes, use of this image would be acceptable.
Answer - link/guideline: The website states that the images are all in the public domain, and according to the website's listing in
WP:PDI, this classification as public domain can be relied upon.
Answer- Explanation: Use of this image would be acceptable.
Answer - link/guideline: [ [5]] indicates that the license it is licensed under allows for such use.
Answer- Explanation: No. Use of this
Answer - link/guideline: Fails WP:IMAGERES - Too high of resolution. Fails WP:NFCI #8, as the image would likely only be used for decorative purposes, as it is not the key resembler of any set style. Especially, use of the image of a commercial sculpture would fail the example at WP:NFCI#UUI #12 and #16.
P;lease read WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFF. Point out the WP:NPOV words/phrases and rewrite the paragraph on Question 9 & 10 from a neutral point of view.
Answer: POV phrases - "brilliant", "rare and exceptional beauty," "destroyed", "talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate."
Rewrite - She is a boxer, who turned pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight. In this fight, which occurred on December 14, 2013, she defeated her opponent in 20 seconds. She fought under XXX promotion on her next fight in February 2014.
Answer:
POV phrases: "popular, acclaimed" (we'd need a citation to prove that RS consider him to be acclaimed), "who loves by all who watched his films", "tender, innocent."
Rewrite - He is a Bulgarian actor. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry at the age of 14. He has featured in 44 films.
Answer:Just because content is verifiable doesn't mean it's worthy of inclusion. Inserting extreme minority viewpoints or trivial negative details in a BLP can hijack the article. Giving extremely minor viewpoints equal weight in an article reduces neutrality and factual accuracy and should be avoided.
Answer:For one thing, it falls against Wikipedia's stated purpose - to build an encyclopedia. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia is a tertiary source, and tertiary sources build off of secondary sources. The original research is a primary source, and it would have to be discussed in a secondary source before an encyclopedia could pick it up. Also, original research fails WP:RS as the content has no editorial oversight.
Answer: As an editor, it is not appropriate to insert your own original research or opinions. However, it is appropriate to insert the original research of others (if the guidelines for using primary sources are followed) and the opinions of subject-matter important figures can be included if properly attributed so that it's clear that the opinion is the opinion of the cited figure. For instance, Tucker Carlson's opinions on matters of US politics can be included, but only if attributed to Tucker Carlson.
Answer:
(Disclaimer: I have absolutely no idea who this figure is, but he seems to be a leader to some degree in Islam, so he is probably a subject matter expert on Islamic law).
According to, (Insert title and name I don't remember), Islamic law requires clothing for below the waist to be loose, not see through, and to cover the private areas. (and a citation would be inserted here).
According to Sh. Shady Alsulieman, Islamic law requires clothing to be loose or baggy, not see through, not of such a color as to attract attention to the clothing, and to cover the wearer's private areas.
“ | Islam demands Islam commands us with our with regards of our clothing for both men and women, our clothing must be first of all baggy, so must be loose with a men or women. It must non see-through whether men or women. It must non colorful attractive that means when someone walks everyone's looking at them. [1] | ” |
References
Answer: WP:V requires us to use the information provided by reliable, independent sources, so we would have to stick with the figure of two sons in that case. The figure of three, although accurate, is not supported by reliable sources, so we would have to stick with the other figure in this case.
Hog Farm see Assignment 3 above. Best.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 02:24, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
PART 2
No | Criterion | Application | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|
1 | G1 | For patent nonsense, which is strictly defined as content that is incomprehensible. | ![]() |
2 | G2 | Test pages - usually pages marked as test in either the content or the edit summary. | ![]() |
3 | G3 | Vandalism and hoaxes. However, subtle hoaxes should be taken to AfD. | ![]() |
4 | G4 | Content that is "substantially similar" to content that was previously deleted in a deletion discussion. | ![]() |
5 | G5 | Content created in violation of a ban or block - only content created after the sanctions apply (this is usually through a sock) | ![]() |
6 | G6 | Uncontroversial housekeeping - things such as redirects in the way of page moves, deleting templates after TfD, etc. | ![]() |
7 | G7 | The author and only substantial contributor requests deletion in good-faith or blanks the page. | ![]() |
8 | G8 | Pages that depend on a page that no longer exists - Talk pages of deleted pages, subpages with no parent page, etc. | ![]() |
9 | G9 | Decisions by the Wikimedia Foundation office. | ![]() |
10 | G10 | Pages that only serve the purpose of attacking the subject | ![]() |
11 | G11 | Unambiguous spam | ![]() |
12 | G12 | Blatant copyright violations, in which simply removing the violations would leave basically nothing left. Also, all versions of the page need to qualify (revisions can be deleted through revdel). | ![]() |
13 | G13 | Drafts that have not been edited by a human in six months. | ![]() |
14 | G14 | Disambiguation pages that don't disambiguate anything. | ![]() |
No | Criterion | Application | Comment by Cass |
---|---|---|---|
1 | A1 | Articles without enough context to tell what it's talking about. | ![]() |
2 | A2 | Non-English article present somewhere else on the Wikimedia. | ![]() |
3 | A3 | Articles with no substantive content - only links, tags, images, etc. | ![]() |
4 | A5 | Articles that have completed the transwiki process | ![]() |
5 | A7 | Articles about people, bands, clubs, individual animals, organizations, websites, or events that do not signify why the subject is significant in a credible manner. | ![]() |
6 | A9 | Articles about musical recordings that do not signify importance and where the musician does not have an article. | ![]() |
7 | A10 | Recently created articles that duplicate content existing in another article. | ![]() |
8 | A11 | Articles about subjects that are obviously the products of the article creator, and do not indicate significance. | ![]() |
9 | R2 | Cross-namespace redirects that do not go to the template, category, wikipedia, help, or portal namespaces. | ![]() |
Answer i: Design Cafe
Answer ii: Terrell on Advertising
Answer iii: Law Payne
Answer iv: Malovec-Studios I.N.C
Answer v: History of Hair Metal Music
Answer:
A page is nominated for G12 when removing the copyright violations would leave nothing worth saving and consist of the page's entire history. REVDEL is used when the page is savable: content other than the COPYVIOS exists, and the page history is not completely ruined.
Answer:
A copyright violation is the use of another's copyrighted intellectual work without permission. Copyright violations do not have to be exact matches of the work, very close, but slightly different reproductions can also be copyright violations. It's like trespassing or theft, but with intellectual property instead of physical property.
Answer i: Properly cited direct quotes.
Answer ii: The article uses material from sources within the public domain
Answer iii: Materials that have gone through the formal donation process
Answer: This conduct is illegal, and infringes upon the rights of others. There are times when what looks like a violation is lawfully taking places - use of public domain materials, etc. When in doubt, go through the copyright violation revdel request, and an administrator can delete the infringing revisions.
Answer i:
Kodava cuisine
Answer ii: Baron Raymonde
Answer iii:
Voon Lee Shan
Answer iv:
St.Stephens Orthodox Cathedral kudassanad
Answer v:
Gaulstown, County Westmeath (Later recreated in a proper way, but the copyright violation version was speedily deleted)
Answer i: List of German exonyms for places in Italy - G4
Answer ii: Ronald Reagam - R3
Answer iii: Joey Daser - G4
Answer iv: Afghanai (disambiguation) - G14
Answer v: Angelina Green - G4
Answer: Sometimes, newly created articles are produced about subjects that would warrant an article, but are far from being ready for the articlespace. These articles can be moved to the draftspace and the remaining CNR nominated for R2. However, reviewers moving pages to the draftspace should make sure at least an hour has elapsed since the last major edit to the article, to make sure the article is in its complete state.
Answer i: Present NFL season - A10
Answer ii:
Gabriel Finch - A7
Answer iii:
Omar Alaa Mubarak - A7 (Deleted per A7 as requested, later recreated, so it may be a bluelink if it hasn't been redeleted by the time you see this.)
Answer iv: Khai Dreams - A7 (musician)
Answer v: ಕಹಳೆ - A2
Answer: There are certain red flags to this. The greatest of which is first-person pronouns, article written including "I" and "we" are almost certainly either COI/PAIDs or copied and pasted off a website somewhere. Long-winded sections of puffery or promotion on an organization or person's page are red flags for this. Also, sometimes editors give away COIs in the edit summaries. Other COI or paid editors will be kind enough to identify themselves as such on the talk page.
Answer:
The user should first get a message on their talk page linking to the project pages about editing with a COI. If it's a new editor, giving them the welcome message with the Five Pillars of Wikipedia might be helpful. The article/user should noted on the COI noticeboard. The nature of the article might determine what needs to be done with it. Blatant spam can be G11'd, and autobiographies that demonstrate no credible claim to importance can be A7'd. If it looks like the subject might be notable, it might be helpful to see if an unrelated user would be interested in improving the article if it was temporarily moved to draftspace.
13. Please read
WP:PAID. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a paid editor?
Answer:First, the user should get a message on their talk page pointing them to the paid editor guidelines. WP:PAID states that the article can be taken to either the administrator's noticeboard for incidents or the COI noticeboard. Personally, I feel like the COI noticeboard would be the better target, it would only be drastic enough to take it to ANI if this is a long-term problem. Then, the article should be checked to see if it meets any of the CSD, and if not, either moved to the draftspace to see if an unrelated editor wants to improve it, or sent through the deletion process (AfD probably better than PROD here).
Hog Farm See Part 2 - Assignment 4 above. Assignment 4 and 5 are the hardest assignment in the program. Do read through CSD carefully as high successful CSD rate is requirement to pass the program. Please set up your CSD log, add CVredel, install Earwig copyvio check and bookmark the URL as well. Let me know if you need any help. Best. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 03:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Notes:
G11 (promo) - What constitute a G11? At times it is hard to define. Although if a article is blantly promote or adverstise about the subject then it is a G11. Sometimes, the it is a little subtle and that would be a judgement call. As a rule of thumb, if article about an entertainers (actor/singer/DJ/artist and etc) in dept of how hard they work, how motivated they are, using all the puffery/flowery languagues and especially the subject does not meet notability guidelines. For a corporation, we would see they list down all they product/services, their directors/key person in the company, they mission, their client, they are the influencer in their industrial, all the words/phrased to enhance/market the company and no substantial info that is supported by independent reliable sources.
G12 (copyvio) -
Copyright violation addresses the use of original expression without permission of the holder which is a violation of laws even the credit is given to the source. For articles, the Copyright Law gives the copyright protection to the “original works of authorship fixed in in a tangible medium of expression” in the newspaper, magazine and freelance article at the moment of their creation, for the life of the creator plus 70 years after, and 95 years for corporation publication or 120 years from date of creation, whichever is shorter.
A “fact” is not considered an original work of authorship; but how the ways facts are recorded where the style of the writing, choice and/or arrangement of words are copyrightable. An infringement of copyright is committed when a person uses the “exact words /almost exact words in a consecutive manner” of the author/holder. To note, as a guideline, a few words copies from the original works and an idea of expression such as "weather the storm", 'crossing the Rubicon" "as dead as a doornail" and etc. proper nouns, document/event/treaty/person/title/ names are generally acceptable and so is a direct quote of speech. However, any longer phrases which would be expression in a number of ways are copyright protected. To use one of two short sentences on a large article generally is ok but it will considered infringement if the edit entry is consists of big percentage of the original work and yet for some (such as newspaper/press/journalism that takes their work very seriously - anything more than 4 exact consecutively words would considered copyvio). To avoid copyright infringement, one needs uses his/her own words to convey the source’s information. Paraphrasing could minimise the the copyright violation; however, "threshold" ultimately, court judgement would determined the if copyright violation has been made.
Copyvio for texts or images shared the same notion that it is not a copyvio if the verbatim texts or images are taken from free licence and Public domain sites/specific page/image. I have indicated to you on Assignement 3 - section 3.3 - Q5, Q6, Q7 that always check the "original source" even if in WikiCommon the editor who upload the image claim taken from a PD site, we need to check the link provided and if the site indicate the image taken from another source, then we check the source. For texts, we need to check the sites if it is a PD, sometimes the disclaimer of PD is not on the page, but on the home page or "about" page or FAQ page. Secondly, for older article (no in NPP Feed), any copyvio texts found, we will revdel it as it is almost always it is not the first versions. If a small amount of verbatim texts found in NPP Feed articles, we would revdel them; but large amount of verbatim texts we will tag G12.
Lastly, here are a few examples where the German car maker Audi was sued for copyright breach.
1. Audi infringed copyright violation over Eminem’s song “Lose Yourself” in their commercial advertising. [7]
2. Audi was fined US $ 965,000 over copyright infringement for using 10 words from Brian Andreas’s story of “Angel of Mercy” - [8]
I think I just had a wake-up call, and it was disguised as a car, and it was screaming at me not to get too comfortable and fall asleep and miss my life. (Audi commercial) Some people don’t know that there are angels whose only job is to make sure you don’t get too comfortable & fall asleep & miss your life.(Brian Andreas’ print)
Hope the above help. Note the above doest not substitute the Wikipedia links I provided above. Please make sure you read the reading material as well. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA( talk) 17:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Spot COI / PAID
COI editors are permitted to edit Wikipedia and create on the affected articles; however, it is "HIGHLY DISCOURAGE/NOT RECOMMENDED as it is very difficult for the COI editors to write the article/input info into the affected article in [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view}}.
1.Use person pronouns and possessives (I, we, my, our) 2.Multiple references to company, financial listings, staff lists, interviews, own publication, press release, blog and with clean references 3.Well written prose 'too perfect to be true' and only with single/2 edits 4.Editors have created multiple company related articles 5.Editors disclosed their COI/PAID in their userpage (not tag with COI disclose), or disclosure when they ask question in WP:Teahouse, WP:Help Desk, WP:AFCHD or receivers' talk pages.
In assignment 4, we look at articles which fits in WP:Criteria for speedy deletion (CSD) where by the the articles are deleted within a few hours to 24 hours from the time of the nomination. In Assignment 5, we discuss the what actions should be taken for those articles do not fit under the CSD criteria but do not meet relevant criteria for content of the encyclopedia.
Please read
WP:PROD,
WP:BLPPROD,
WP:MERGE,
WP:DRAFTIFY,
WP:NPPDRAFT and
WP:REDIR,
WP:AFD and answer the following questions. (Provide links and hisdiff where they are applied.)
Answer: PROD is meant for pages and files that don't quite meet the criteria for speedy deletion, but whose deletion would be considered uncontroversial. For PROD, a WP:BEFORE search should be conducted to make sure that the subject really is non-notable, not just a badly-written page. PROD is also only usable for articles that have not been PRODed before, have not been discussed at AFD at any point, and have not been undeleted. Deletion discussions can be costly in editor time, so PROD is designed to have a means for uncontroversial deletions without creating a deletion discussion.
Answer: A WP:BEFORE search should be conducted to ensure that the subject is truly non-notable, and that it isn't just a badly written page on a notable subject. If it is thought that the deletion could be controversial, go the AFD route instead. Additionally, the page history should be checked to make sure the bad version of the page isn't a vandalism or spam hijack and to make sure that the article meets the PROD qualifiers listed in the question above.
Answer: The criteria for BLPPROD is that the article is about a living person, and that the page contains no references of any form. If the BLPPROD route is not chosen, there are several options. If the article is eligible for standard PROD, that route can be used. Additionally, the article can be taken to AFD for a full deletion discussion. In special circumstances, such as a figure that is clearly notable, but the article is not fully compliant with WP:BLP due to insufficiency of references, the page can be draftified.
Answer: AFD is for articles that likely do not meet the guidelines for articles ( WP:GNG, WP:NEO, etc.) but whose deletion may be controversial. A WP:BEFORE search should be conducted, as notability is judged on the existence of sources, not on the state of the article. If the WP:BEFORE search indicates that even with full source usage, the article won't meet policy, then it should be listed at AFD. There's a manual process for the listing, but it's much easier with Twinkle.
Answer: Seven days for PROD or BLPPROD (unless declined). For AfD, the basic time frame is seven days, although WP:SNOW deletes can go quicker, and AfDs are often relisted if the consensus isn't clear, so AfDs can sometimes last a few weeks.
Answer: If after a WP:BEFORE search, notability still doesn't show up, nominate the article for WP:AFD.
Answer: PROD is for uncontroversial deletions that meet certain criteria, if the criteria are not met, or the deletion is viewed to be possibly controversial, PROD is not the right call, and AFD is better. BLPROD has very strict criteria, if those criteria are met, then BLPROD can be used. If a deletion is potentially controversial, then AFD should be the route used.
Answer:If an article does not meet the notability requirements, but has good content (reliably sourced), and the article content would make a valid section in another article, it can be merged. WP:PAGEDECIDE allows a decent amount of space for editor consensus for a merge. For instance, if content is only really understood in the context of another article, it may be best to merge.
Cassiopeia( talk) 05:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Answer:
Answer:If a page appears to have been created by a COI or paid editor, it should be moved to draftspace. Otherwise, articles can be moved to draftspace when the article subject appears to have some merit, the article is far from meeting the relevant article standards, and the article is not undergoing active improvement (like with CSD, give it awhile after creation before draftifying).
Answer 1: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Metroid - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. Only coverage I could find was either in unreliable sources like fan wikis or in articles like "top 10 cheats on how to beat the Queen Metroid".
Answer 2: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irony Bribe Article was about a WP:NEOLOGISM that a WP:BEFORE indicated was only used in one article, and had no to little widespread usage.
Answer 3: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs recorded by Jacob Collier - Redundant content fork of content best handled at already existing pages.
Answer 4: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin Ross (2nd nomination) - Fails the SNG WP:NGRIDIRON by not playing in an actual NFL game. Coverage was mostly in unreliable sources or of a nature such as transactions and signing to his college team that fail WP:GNG.
Answer 5: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernoulli-Doppler-Leidenfrost-Peltzman-Sabir-Whorf-Dunning-Kruger-Stroop effect - Fails WP:GNG and may be a joke.
Answer 1: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Patterson (American football) - Voted to delete. Comprehensive GNG fail and also failed the American football SNG diff of !vote
Answer 2: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Physics Post - WYU - No clear claim to significance, and the subject appears to be referring to a Facebook page, of which reliable secondary sources don't exist. diff of !vote
Answer 3:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Thompson (politician) - Failure of GNG and the
WP:NPOL SNG.
diff of !vote
Answer 4: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nassau Junction, Missouri - Fails WP:GNG and WP:GEOLAND diff of !vote
Answer 5: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2023 NFL Draft - WP:TOOSOON. The only thing set about this event is the location. The dates aren't even known yet, there's just too little known about this event to be able to write a non- WP:OR article on this subject. dif of !vote
Answer 1: Wallis Lane - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBAND by a very large margin, could have possibly been a speedy, but a WP:BEFORE search turned up a slight claim to importance, but not near notability standards.
Answer 2:
Kindergarten Forest Hill in Bellingham Green - Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NORG. Almost no kindergarten-only schools are notable.
Answer 1: Leszek A Gasieniec - Newly created biography of a living professor, with no citations provided. Article was a microstub and the person may not meet WP:NACADEMIC, so went for PROD instead of draftification.
Answer 2:
Beili Liu - Living person, claim to significance, no references or external links provided.
(2) The version of Beili Liuhen you BLPROD was correct but now they tag was removed and sources are added. (do provide the hist diff of your PORD/BLPROD or etc (everything) next time) Cassiopeia( talk) 05:56, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Answer 1: Frank Kmet moved to Draft:Frank Kmet. Article about a living person with one source (not eligible for BLP PROD), but overall insufficient sourcing. Moved to draftspace to allow for additional citations to be provided and creator notified on their user talk page.
Answer 2: You and Me (2011 film) moved to Draft:You and Me (2011 film). Unsourced article about a film. I don't read Iranian, so I couldn't determine if the article would be notable or not. Anyway, since it had no references, it wasn't ready for the mainspace, so moved to draftspace.
Answer 3:
List of Telugu film actresses -
diff of nomination @
Cassiopeia: - Did I do that right?
Hog Farm (
talk) 04:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Answer 4: ETO - SZESE Győr FKC - diff of nomination. Hopefully this one doesn't get removed by the page creator like the Telugu film actresses one did.
Notes:
In this assignment we look at tagging pages for problems. There any many tags available in Wikipedia and we will look at some of them here.
Please read WP:TAGGING and answer the questions below. Please provide explanation in your own words and provide hist diff when applicable.
Answer:
To alert users that an article needs worked on in some way(s). For instance, users who enjoy copy editing can go through the category of pages tagged for needing a copyedit, and then work on those issues.
Answer:
Adding a tag to an article when the problem isn't obvious without explaining on the talk page the rationale behind the tag. This is discouraged.
Answer:
Answer:
When either the problem has been fixed, or the problem is no longer applicable. Unless removing the tag is a cut-and-dry issue, then the tag removal should be explained on the talk page.
(pls provide links)
i. Answers: Tagged Cornelius Atherton as unreferenced. Notified User:Adin-Atherton. Diffs of [10] (tag) and [11] (notify user)
ii. Answers: Tagged
2020 EFL Championship play-off final as unreferenced. Notified
User:Brianludden05. Diff of
[12] for tag and diff of
[13] for notification
iii. Answers: Tagged
Achola Rosario as orphan. Diff of
[14] Notified
User:Sandra Aceng, diff of
[15]
iv. Answers: Tagged
Riskee And The Ridicule for notability-music. Doesn't seem to meet the music notability guidelines, but I don't know a whole lot about UK punk rock, so I'll just tag it and let an expert in that subject matter deal with it. Diff of tag
[16] Diff of notify
[17]
v. Answers: Tagged
Rukh-Shana Namuyimba as needing more citations. Diff of notify of
[18], diff of tag of
[19]
vi. Answers: Tagged
Zhongshan West railway station as unreferenced. Diff of tag of
[20] Diff of notify of
[21]
vii. Answers: Tagged PIP2 domain as needing more citations. Diff of tag of [22], diff of notify of [23]
viii.Answers: Tagged
Forest meditation as unreferenced. Diff of tag of
[24]. Diff of notify of
[25]
ix. Answers: Tagged
Line 4 (Naples) as unreferenced. Diff of tag of
[26], diff of notify of
[27]
x. Answers: Tagged Gomolo as unreferenced. diff of tag of [28]. Diff of notify of [29]
i. Answers:
Even Financial. Added two sub sorter. Diff of
[30]
ii. Answers:
Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations. Added three sub sorts. Diff of
[31]
iii. Answers:
Scandium perchlorate - Added one sub sort. Diff of
[32]
iv. Answers:
1982–83 Utah Utes men's basketball team - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[33]
v. Answers:
Curio muirii - Added one stub sort. diff of
[34]
vi. Answers:
4-Methylenedioxy-4-imidazoline - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[35]
vii. Answers: John Craig (economist) - Added one stub sort. Diff of [36]
viii.Answers:
Marty Goddard - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[37]
ix. Answers:
Andrea Young - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[38]
x. Answers:
Najmi Ahmad - Added one stub sort. Diff of
[39]
i. Answers: Added three categories to Manuela Furlan (typo, changed one in the next edit). Diff of [40].
ii. Answers: Added
Category:Lists of firearms to
List of firearms (A) Diff of
[41]
iii. Answers: Added
Category:Lists of firearms to
List of firearms (R) Diff of
[42]
iv. Answers: Added
Category: Santa Barbara County, California to
Camino Cielo. Diff of
[43]
v. Answers: Added one category to
Sidi Harazem Bath Complex. Diff of
[44]
vi. Answers: Added one category to
Avraham Moshe Bonhart. Diff of
[45]
vii. Answers: Added three categories to
Riskee And The Ridicule, diff of
[46]
viii.Answers: Added three categories to
Rukh-Shana Namuyimba. Diff of
[47]
ix. Answers: Added one category to
Zhongshan West railway station Diff of
[48]
x. Answers: Added
Category:Lipids to
PIP2 domain. Diff of
[49]
i. Answers: Rated
List of firearms (A) for two projects. Diff of
[50]
ii. Answers: Rated
List of firearms (R) for two projects. Diff of
[51]
iii. Answers:
Najmi Ahmad - Rated for three projects. Diff of
[52] (created the talk page with this edit, so no great diff for this)
iv. Answers:
Mohammed Hussain Nasrallah - Rated for two projects. Diff of
[53]
v. Answers:
2020 EFL Championship play-off final - Rated for three projects. Diff of
[54]
vi. Answers:
Princepal Singh - Rated for two projects. Diff of
[55]
vii. Answers: 1906 Chicago Physicians and Surgeons football team - Rated for one project. Diff of [56]
viii.Answers: Ivankivtsi, Ternopil Hromada - Rated for one project. Diff of [57]
ix. Answers: Lâm Sơn - Rated for one project. Diff of [58]
x. Answers: Cosmos and History - Rated for two projects. Diff of [59]
i. Answer: Added "Italian rugby union player" to Manuela Furlan. Diff of [60]
ii. Answer: Added "Jewish religious leader" to
Gershon Edelstein. Diff of
[61]
iii. Answer: Added "River in Bhutan" to
Pho Chhu Diff of
[62]
iv. Answer: Added "Kenyan record label" to
WeOwnFire Diff of
[63]
v. Answer: Added "Fútsal club in Barrio Obero, Asunción, Paraguay" to
Corrales FBC. Diff of
[64]
vi. Answer: Added "Indian martial artist and self-defense trainer" to
Cherupalli Vivek Teja. Diff of
[65]
vii. Answer: Added "American IndyCar Series racing team to
Citrone/Buhl Autosport. Diff of [
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Citrone%2FBuhl_Autosport&type=revision&diff=962284465&oldid=962284142
viii. Answer: Added "Diplomatic relations between Malta and the European Union to
Sovereign Military Order of Malta–European Union relations, diff of
[66]
ix. Answer: Added "Australian professional golfer" to
George Serhan, diff of [
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=George_Serhan&type=revision&diff=962791612&oldid=962790396
x. Answer: Added "Canadian ambassador" to
Renata Wielgosz, diff of [
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Renata_Wielgosz&type=revision&diff=962791812&oldid=962791417
Hog Farm Apologies. See assignment 6 above. Cassiopeia( talk) 09:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Answer:
First, it's important to not jump to the conclusion that bad faith is going on unless they've given you a really obvious reason not to. At least in my view, registered users and IPs should be treated equally, except for the consideration that an IP may be shared, so more than one user (some of whom may be productive contributers) may be on that IP. If there's a disagreement going on, provide linked policy-based statements to support your view. If it gets to the point that a report needs to be filed against an obviously bad-faith user, then always provide diffs for evidence of the behaviors.
i. Answer: Assume that they're genuinely wanting to help the encyclopedia.
ii. Answer: Help inform them of small things you wouldn't think of in a non-put-downing way. For instance, it took me almost a week to realize that four ~ would sign signatures automatically for me, so I had to manually copy the syntax of other user's comments and look up UTC on my own for a week.
iii. Answer: Link to policies for them. New editor's aren't going to understand what notability is, for example.
iv. Answer: If you notice a new editor doing something particularly effective, give them a nice note on their talk page.
v. Answer: New users frequently use test edits in the article space. When reverting/warning, explain test edits and point them to the sandbox. Don't call test edits by new users vandalism, unless its blatant
vi. Answer: Communicate first. Many new editors will be making iffy edits through lack of experience. Don't just take them to AIV instantly.
vii. Answer: Don't be overeager with pushing deletion. Consider trying to fix the article first. For instance, if a new editor creates a BLP article with no sources, add a reliable source, instead of quickly BLP PRODding
viii. Answer: I've done a little bit of WP:UAA work. There's some users that will report anything borderline from a new users. It's generally less WP:BITEy to communicate with them on their talk page rather than just report them to UAA without thinking.
ix. Answer: Give them a friendly welcome. A friendly welcome soon after they start editing helps to make the place more friendly.
x. Answer: If they jump into complex tasks early, like AfD, and mess up, don't go after them for it unless it becomes a big problem. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/This Kind of Town was an AfD I opened early in my editing tenure, and it was a notable subject. Thankfully, I didn't get called incompetent for opening it, or otherwise I may have left.
i. Answer: Avoid sarcasm. It's really hard to interpret sarcasm in online text.
ii. Answer: Assume good faith
iii. Answer: When explaining things to new user, provide links to policies, so that the user can read and understand, instead of giving the impression that there's a cabal of who says what's acceptable and not
iv. Answer: When providing the links in iii., use full titles, not shortcuts/shorthand. Some of the jargon/shortcuts/shorthand is exclusively used on Wikipedia, so new users will find it incomprehensible.
v. Answer: Don't tag articles for deletion immediately after creation (except in extreme circumstances), give it awhile to see if it grows.
vi. Answer: Consider using personalized messages, rather than just using templates, particularly with some of the warning templates, which would freak out a new user.
vii. Answer: If an edit by a new user has an edit with broken syntax or another minor problem, go ahead and fix the problem, instead of reverting it
viii. Answer: Don't call something vandalism in an edit summary unless it really is vandalism.
ix. Answer: Don't call their work junk, or any other equivalent phrase.
x. Answer: Don't call them a sockpuppet/SPA/etc.
i. Answer: User:Usedwii diff
ii. Answer: User:Oroboros66. diff
iii. Answer: User:Radioguy85. diff
iv. Answer: User:Therealanswerwasnothing. diff
v. Answer: User:Kid275. diff
i. Answer: Revenge deletion nominations of articles you created/significant worked on. Don't attack the user or accuse them of a revenge nom. Instead, plainly and calmly use policy-based reasoning as to why the article/redirect/file is acceptable for Wikipedia. If you can't do that, then maybe the article isn't suitable after all
ii. Answer: Profanity. Just ignore it. I have a real-life job that involves me getting swore at a lot, so I'm use to just ignoring such language.
iii. Answer: Legal threats. Tactfully point the threatening editor to
Wikipedia:No legal threats and quietly contact an administrator for revision deletion of the threat. If the problem persists, the user may have to be reported to ANI.
iv. Answer: Accusations of being a single-purpose account. This has happened to me. Point out your varied work to them, maybe the user will find an area they're interested in. (Side note: the user who accused me turned out to be a SPA sockpuppet, although I did not accuse them of such).
v. Answer: Trolling. Don't feed the trolls. Quietly report to AIV, revert the edits (rollback is your friend), and maybe quietly list the page for protection if it gets really bad. Don't draw extra attention to them.
We reward Wikipedia editors for their hard work and due diligence by awarding them barnstars as a token of appreciation, encouragement and make its recipient feel good of their contributions. The choice of banstar given should be fair and appropriate, which will help prevent over-use. There are many different type of banstars, kindly read Wikipedia:Barnstars, Wikipedia:Personal user awards
i. Answer: User talk:Parsecboy - The Good Articles Barnstar. Diff of [67]. Very prolific editor at bringing articles to GA-status.
ii. Answer:
User talk:Sturmvogel 66 - The Writer's Barnstar. Diff of
[68]. Prolific article writer at
WP:MILHIST, a WikiProject I'm involved with
iii. Answer:
User talk:Gog the Mild - The Original Barnstar. Diff of
[69]. They helped me a lot in preparing an article I've been working on for it's ongoing FAC. I've been busy with the FAC, which is why progress here has been slow.
iv. Answer:
User talk:Djmaschek - The American Civil War Barnstar. Diff of
[70]. Excellent article writing.
v. Answer: User talk:Eddie891 - The Original Barnstar. Diff of [71]. Editor I've worked with several times who's running for RFA, I personally think they'd make a great admin.
Hog Farm pls see assignment 7 above. Stay safe and best.
Cassiopeia(
talk) 10:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
# | Tools | For / Functions |
---|---|---|
1 | Twinkle | Wikipedia gadget to assist common maintenance tasks |
2 | Hotcat | Wikipedia gadget to propose existing categories for auto-completion |
3 | Resource Request | Wikipedia help desk to locate content of printed books or form paywall sites |
4 | Google translate | Translation |
5 | Citation Tool for Google Books | Citation tool for Google books |
6 | Reverse Image Search | Reverse image serach |
7 | User:Interstellarity/CSD log | Your Criteria for speedy deletion log] |
8 | This is your AfD log | Your Article for Deletion log |
9 |
Earwig's Copyvio Detector via web
|
Copyvio detector tool |
10 | CV-revdel | Delete copyrighted content request |
11 | StubSorter user script. | Adding/removing stub tags |
12 | Rater user script | Adding, removing, or modifying WikiProject banners, including class and importance assessment |
13 | StubSorter user script | Adding stub class sorter |
14 |
Shortdesc helper script
Wikipedia gadget - Adding short description in the article | |
15 | Special:NewPagesFeed | Search new articles in Wikipedia |
16 | Copyvio Check | Displays the % of copyvio in a separate section of the info menu of the NPP toolset. |
17 | Superlinks | Quickly view pages and information related to the page they are currently viewing or editing without the need to navigate away form current page |
18 | NPP flowchart | NPP flowchart |
Hog Farm No home works for Assignment 8 - Just make sure you have all the tools which I have provided to you so far and know how to use them and when to use them.06:18, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012 | ![]() |
![]() |
? Not sure | ✘ No |
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
[72] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Offline source | ![]() |
can't access | can't access | ? Unknown |
[73] | ![]() |
Can't tell. Site is mostly code jibberish | ![]() |
✘ No |
[74] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
[75] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
[76] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[77] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
[78] | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://oh.sciencehistory.org/oral-histories/gottschling-daniel-e | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.gs.washington.edu/faculty/gottschling.htm | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.nasonline.org/member-directory/members/20024835.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.nasonline.org/programs/awards/molecular-biology.html | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://oxfordaasc.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195301731.001.0001/acref-9780195301731-e-35499 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Offline | ![]() |
![]() |
Can't access | ? Unknown |
https://www.sos.mo.gov/archives/history/historicallistings/molegc | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/33468412/deverne-calloway-obit/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://tam.missouri.edu/MHCTC/docs/suffrage/notable4.pdf | ![]() |
? Unclear if this is a student project or produced by university faculty | ![]() |
? Unknown |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2012/10/13/wakeman-school-memories-sought-as-closure-looms/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.adamsgs.uk/school-life/curriculum/history | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://www.ukgameshows.com/ukgs/All_Time_Winners_List | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-53860189 | ![]() |
![]() |
Piece doesnt' name contestant, so I can't tell if its about Fear or not | ? Unknown |
https://tabletennisengland.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/TTN/2002-03/May2003.pdf | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.nitrkl.ac.in/docs/Faculty/CV/1890547.pdf | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
http://iiitvadodara.ac.in/faculty/skp001.php | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://scholar.google.co.in/citations?user=6vFfeb4AAAAJ&hl=en | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
http://www.thecomposerworks.com/news/jojo-gran-gran/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/proginfo/2020/11/jojo-and-grangran | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://inews.co.uk/culture/jojo-gran-gran-cartoon-celebrating%E2%80%94black-british-family-bonds-406058 | I'm getting an error code | I'm getting an error code | I'm getting an error code | ? Unknown |
https://melanmag.com/2020/03/17/jojo-gran-gran-cbeebies-tv-series/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.gbif.org/species/3390305 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://eol.org/pages/6592236/names | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://recetasdecocina.elmundo.es/2017/05/callos-madrilena-receta-casera.html | ![]() |
? I have no idea what this source is, and I don't read the relevant language | ![]() |
? Unknown |
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Lobel_s_Meat_and_Wine/fcMC0VCHZ9gC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=Callos+a+madrilena&pg=PA207&printsec=frontcover | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Offline source | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't access source | ? Unknown |
https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Philippine_Cookbook/HUaDoUF0tRwC?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA125&printsec=frontcover | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Philippine_Food_Cooking_Dining_Dictionar/STSWDwAAQBAJ | ![]() |
![]() |
? Can't access relevant part | ? Unknown |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29565725 | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
https://www.spottedbylocals.com/athens/loukanikos-graffiti/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://libcom.org/gallery/loukanikos-greek-anarchist-dog | ![]() |
? I'm honestly not sure, but it's not sigcov, so it doesn't matter | ![]() |
✘ No |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/groundbreaking-held-pocatello-idaho-temple | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
https://churchofjesuschristtemples.org/pocatello-idaho-temple/ | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✘ No |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Landis' Missouri Battery is my favorite I've written. Second Battle of Newtonia Site is my most recent.
Hog Farm See Assignment 9 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia( talk) 06:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC) Cassiopeia( talk) 06:52, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
While notability is the most important concept for a reviewer, communication is our most important responsibility. Communication takes a few forms for the NPP reviewer:
1. In your own words, why and how do communicate with the editor and why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE them?
2. What kind of sources are needed to demonstrate/contribute the notability of the subject? Why it is important?
3.What constitutes a
WP:COPYVIO? and why it is not a copyvio even the texts are identical the same as per sources?
4. What should we do when we encounter WP:COPYVIO article and what should we place on the COPYVIO editor's talk page?
5. What should we do when we encounter
WP:PAID article and what should we place on the PAID editor's talk page?
6. When do we nominated a page for WP:G12 and when do we WP:REVDEL the COPYVIO text?
7. What constitute an article is a WP:PROMO page? and what should do do when we encounter one?
8. Why do we tag a page? What are the normal tags we place in an article
9. When do we
WP:R2 a page?
10. When do we WP:PROD a page?
11. When do we
WP:BLPPROD a page?
12. When do we
WP:AfD a page?
13. Why it is important to
WP:CSD a page when the article fit the CSD criteria?
14. When do we decide to
WP:R2 /
WP:PROD /
WP:BLPPROD a page when the article has no source in it?
15. In your own words, list 5 things you have learnt from observing and participating in AfD.
Pls read WP:PROMOTION and WP:G11 and provide 5 successful CSD 11 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diff/links
Answer i:
Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and provide 5 successful CSD 12 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diff and I will check them at your CSD log. You can use Earwig's Copyvio Detector tool to check if an article is in violation of COPYVIO.
Answer i:
Pls read and A1-A11 and R2 at WP:CSD and and provide 5 successful "Article CSD" articles (with at least two of them are CSD A7) you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and hist diff.
Answer i: Thogaya.lk (A7 and G11) Can't access the diff since article is deleted, but it ought to show up in my CSD log.
1. Nominate 2 articles for WP:PROD and state your reasons.
2. Nominate 1 article for WP:BLPROD and state your reasons.
Answer i:
3. Pls read WP:R2 and WP:NPPDRAFT and provide 2 successful WP:R2 from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and hist diff.
Answer i:
1. Participate in 5 WP:AFD where by you are the first voter of the discussion. Please provide you reason either to delete, keep, redirect or merge.
Answer i: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shadow of a habit - Voted to redirect to musician's discography section. Non-notable album, can't find any significant coverage in RS, but it's a logical search term.
Nominate 5 articles for WP:AFD by using WP:Twinkle and provide explanation of your nomination.
Pls list 10 things needs to be considered/done when reviewing a page.'
Pls follow the NPP flowchart and read all the reading material provide from Assignment and tools 1-8 and answer the questions below. Please pick 5 articles that meet the notability guidelines (no PROD/BLPPROD/R2/AfD/CSD) from the new pages from Special:NewPagesFeed and follow the NPP flowchart and provide the appropriate answer below (pls place N/A if not applicable). Pick articles that have 3-4 sources for the exercises below. (pls provide link and hist diff)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
✔ Yes |
Error: a source must be specified | ? Unknown | |||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{ source assess table}}. |
Creating article
Please create an article in via Wikipedia:Articles for creation where by the subject is notable, the content adhere to all the requirement and appropriate tagging/labeling/linking as discussed from Assignment 1-8. Some notable subjects could be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/API Women.
Answer: Capture of Sedalia