This page is for the recording and discussion of complaints related to the mediation process for the Sathya Sai Baba and related articles.
The lates dispute about the inclusion of the word "boy" that I have with SSS108 cannot, I think, be a case in the mediation because I followed all policies of Wikipedia (i.e. providing verifiable, reputable sources such as salon.com), but still SSS108 continues to revert my edits. If SSS108 is so unreasonable or ignorant of Wikipedia policies then what is there left to mediate in this case? I have no intention to have the word "boy" removed unless SSS108 or others come with new good reasons. Until now I have not seen any. Andries 20:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
BostonMA, I was wondering if you can kindly assess whether or not Andries is willing to complete the mediation process. Andries seems more interested in the Prem Rawat article than participating in this mediation, which he agreed to. In my opinion, Andries is stonewalling the discussion and I was hoping you could create a time-table within which Andries would answer the questions. I think this is only fair. I also noticed that Andries promptly responded to questions about the Salon.com article, which he felt was important, but seems hesitant to answer questions that directly challenge the notability of Premanand. SSS108 talk- email 02:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
[Further discussion moved to User:BostonMA/Mediation/Sathya Sai Baba/Agreements to Participate#Timely Responses to Questions Posed by Mediator]
I notice that SSS108 criticizes me for editing Wikipedia without giving a reply to outstanding mediation questions. I have always edited other subjects than Sathya Sai Baba and I will continue to do so. And let us face, the dispute about the Sathya Sai Baba set of articles may be resolved to some extent, but they will never be fully resolved: SSS108 will always want to minimize and discredit criticism and I will always resist that. No mediation is going to change that. I think it is reasonable that BostonMA will after some time stop mediation. Andries 16:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Give all the facts, Andries. You answered the questions after several weeks of delays. And only after I kept applying pressure for you to answer them. SSS108 talk- email 19:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
This page is for the recording and discussion of complaints related to the mediation process for the Sathya Sai Baba and related articles.
The lates dispute about the inclusion of the word "boy" that I have with SSS108 cannot, I think, be a case in the mediation because I followed all policies of Wikipedia (i.e. providing verifiable, reputable sources such as salon.com), but still SSS108 continues to revert my edits. If SSS108 is so unreasonable or ignorant of Wikipedia policies then what is there left to mediate in this case? I have no intention to have the word "boy" removed unless SSS108 or others come with new good reasons. Until now I have not seen any. Andries 20:41, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
BostonMA, I was wondering if you can kindly assess whether or not Andries is willing to complete the mediation process. Andries seems more interested in the Prem Rawat article than participating in this mediation, which he agreed to. In my opinion, Andries is stonewalling the discussion and I was hoping you could create a time-table within which Andries would answer the questions. I think this is only fair. I also noticed that Andries promptly responded to questions about the Salon.com article, which he felt was important, but seems hesitant to answer questions that directly challenge the notability of Premanand. SSS108 talk- email 02:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
[Further discussion moved to User:BostonMA/Mediation/Sathya Sai Baba/Agreements to Participate#Timely Responses to Questions Posed by Mediator]
I notice that SSS108 criticizes me for editing Wikipedia without giving a reply to outstanding mediation questions. I have always edited other subjects than Sathya Sai Baba and I will continue to do so. And let us face, the dispute about the Sathya Sai Baba set of articles may be resolved to some extent, but they will never be fully resolved: SSS108 will always want to minimize and discredit criticism and I will always resist that. No mediation is going to change that. I think it is reasonable that BostonMA will after some time stop mediation. Andries 16:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Give all the facts, Andries. You answered the questions after several weeks of delays. And only after I kept applying pressure for you to answer them. SSS108 talk- email 19:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)