This page was set up in response to a request for mediation initiated by Jossi ( talk · contribs). The parties to the mediation would be:
This would be an entirely voluntary mediation. I have no official status with Wikipedia, and I am not an admin. My only aim would be to assist in dispute resolution. Please let me know if you are willing to have me play the role of mediator by commenting here. -- BostonMA 01:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
BostonMA, I will answer all outstanding questions this weekend. Please note that I have already implemented the agreements about e.g. Nagel as a source to a great extent. I have not touched most of the parts that Moreno insists on having in the article, even if they did not follow policies at all, because experience has shown that he reverts anything that I delete so that would be waste of time. Andries 21:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
If we are to continue the mediation, I think it is appropriate that I ask you whether you think you should answer questions promptly, even when you believe they may not be important or urgent. Please respond to that question directly. Thank-you. BostonMA 17:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
BostonMA, one week max is acceptable to me, yes. One week with excuses for extensions beyond one week is not acceptable to me. SSS108 talk- email 02:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
I had not understood that my slowness in giving replies bothered editors so much. Though I do understand that editors and especially the mediator has put a lot of effort in bringing parties together, I failed to understand the relevance of most of the questions for the article. That was together with the sometimes difficult nature of the questions, and my character of thinking and re-thinking about a problem, the reason for slowness in answering questions. I will really try to be faster. Andries 12:37, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
This page was set up in response to a request for mediation initiated by Jossi ( talk · contribs). The parties to the mediation would be:
This would be an entirely voluntary mediation. I have no official status with Wikipedia, and I am not an admin. My only aim would be to assist in dispute resolution. Please let me know if you are willing to have me play the role of mediator by commenting here. -- BostonMA 01:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
BostonMA, I will answer all outstanding questions this weekend. Please note that I have already implemented the agreements about e.g. Nagel as a source to a great extent. I have not touched most of the parts that Moreno insists on having in the article, even if they did not follow policies at all, because experience has shown that he reverts anything that I delete so that would be waste of time. Andries 21:45, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
If we are to continue the mediation, I think it is appropriate that I ask you whether you think you should answer questions promptly, even when you believe they may not be important or urgent. Please respond to that question directly. Thank-you. BostonMA 17:52, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
BostonMA, one week max is acceptable to me, yes. One week with excuses for extensions beyond one week is not acceptable to me. SSS108 talk- email 02:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
I had not understood that my slowness in giving replies bothered editors so much. Though I do understand that editors and especially the mediator has put a lot of effort in bringing parties together, I failed to understand the relevance of most of the questions for the article. That was together with the sometimes difficult nature of the questions, and my character of thinking and re-thinking about a problem, the reason for slowness in answering questions. I will really try to be faster. Andries 12:37, 25 March 2006 (UTC)