Article is missing many features and does not begin to dissect the mosques qualities and attributes, The article briefly mentions that the mosque was designed by Kashef Mahboob Chowdhury and that it was shortlisted for the Aga Khan Award for Architecture in 2010. While this provides some insight into the mosque's architectural merit, the article could benefit from a more detailed exploration of its design features. For example, discussing the architectural style, unique elements, and cultural influences incorporated into the mosque's design would enhance the reader's understanding and appreciation of its significance.
The article also lacks citations and lacks information about the historical and cultural context surrounding the construction of the Chandgaon Mosque. Providing background information about the significance of mosques in Bangladeshi society, the architectural trends prevalent in the region during the mosque's construction period, and any specific cultural or religious considerations that influenced its design would enrich the narrative.
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
(provide username)
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Article is missing many features and does not begin to dissect the mosques qualities and attributes, The article briefly mentions that the mosque was designed by Kashef Mahboob Chowdhury and that it was shortlisted for the Aga Khan Award for Architecture in 2010. While this provides some insight into the mosque's architectural merit, the article could benefit from a more detailed exploration of its design features. For example, discussing the architectural style, unique elements, and cultural influences incorporated into the mosque's design would enhance the reader's understanding and appreciation of its significance.
The article also lacks citations and lacks information about the historical and cultural context surrounding the construction of the Chandgaon Mosque. Providing background information about the significance of mosques in Bangladeshi society, the architectural trends prevalent in the region during the mosque's construction period, and any specific cultural or religious considerations that influenced its design would enrich the narrative.
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
(provide username)
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)