Reason: Article provides no references and reads like a news release. The article's subject appears to be an unprofessional website that attempts to pass itself off as legitimate news source. It calls itself "ArtDaily.org" when in fact its URL is "artdaily.com." Reliable secondary sources that refer to the article's subject do not seem to be readily available.
Reason: This article is wholly unreferenced, and much of the prose is not even written in complete sentences. Perhaps some of the article could be salvaged, but it should probably be draftified until someone is willing to rewrite and expand it.
Reason: Article provides no references and reads like a news release. The article's subject appears to be an unprofessional website that attempts to pass itself off as legitimate news source. It calls itself "ArtDaily.org" when in fact its URL is "artdaily.com." Reliable secondary sources that refer to the article's subject do not seem to be readily available.
Reason: This article is wholly unreferenced, and much of the prose is not even written in complete sentences. Perhaps some of the article could be salvaged, but it should probably be draftified until someone is willing to rewrite and expand it.