My December 7, 2018 announcement is that I will no longer be editing here. I would like to help out and have tried my best, but it's a lot of hard work to keep the trash out and good stuff in, there's a lot of differing opinions from people and myself on how these things should be done, but it's a task I don't want to be committed to anymore. I've tried to be reasonable and point out when it is reliable to uses sources when they are clearly valid, but not when they are outdated and no longer apply. Sometimes this can be agreed on, but sometimes it's not. And I don't have it in me anymore to debate the "consequences" of what we decide to have. This is Wikipedia, not a live and death decision.
I go on a talk page and ask question. 9 times out of 10 they aren't answered whether they're of "low importance" or not.
Don't use this a reference point, since most of these are wrong by a few days, or a week even.
My December 7, 2018 announcement is that I will no longer be editing here. I would like to help out and have tried my best, but it's a lot of hard work to keep the trash out and good stuff in, there's a lot of differing opinions from people and myself on how these things should be done, but it's a task I don't want to be committed to anymore. I've tried to be reasonable and point out when it is reliable to uses sources when they are clearly valid, but not when they are outdated and no longer apply. Sometimes this can be agreed on, but sometimes it's not. And I don't have it in me anymore to debate the "consequences" of what we decide to have. This is Wikipedia, not a live and death decision.
I go on a talk page and ask question. 9 times out of 10 they aren't answered whether they're of "low importance" or not.
Don't use this a reference point, since most of these are wrong by a few days, or a week even.