-- Ancheta Wis ( talk) 22:52, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators'_guide xTools
"dry convective helical vortices" (DHCVs) [1]
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/whirlwinds-crystals-called-gravel-devils-spotted-andes-mountains
http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/early/2017/03/15/G38901.1.abstract
the microseismic fluctuations in the elastic vibration of Earth's crust at equilibrium, [2]
Wikipedian QM expert, Caroline Thompson (d.2006)
Required speed for an ABM, citation: Rather than a citation for "an ICBM simply moves too fast for these systems", I propose a geometric proof. Would this satisfy the editors? I could provide a sketch of the proof on the talk page, if the editors like. The article would then have a note, rather than a footnote. OK?
There are only a few exact solutions to Schrödinger's equation; the hydrogen atom's electron orbitals is one of them (source: R.P. Feynman, my lecture notes). It's an exact picture of the electron's shape, at various excitations. A spherical shape would be the most common shape for an electron at the lowest energy state. The mathematical form of Schrödinger's equation is called a functional.
Staddon (2017) argues it is a mistake to try following rules[16] which are best learned through careful study of examples of scientific investigation.
https://phys.org/news/2018-12-harnessing-power-orbit-coupling-silicon.html
It may be useful to point out that Haskell development is evolving. At one time, monads were in the spotlight, but functors, applicatives, and monads show that there is a spectrum of 'monadic' behavior: "a monad is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors, what's the problem?" —humorously attributed to Philip Wadler. The interesting point about Haskell is that applications using monads are already out there in industrial settings as in Haxl.
after reading the article in its second pass, it is not Haskell-centric; the notation, I think, might be more like ML, or perhaps ordinary mathematical notation. Some of the lexemes, such as ==
I admit I read as 'is equal to', rather than =
which in Haskell is 'is assigned to be'. If it were Haskell, the :
would be ::
instead, which means 'has type'.
Once we have some more hardware allocated to the eqiad1 region we will start migrating projects in earnest. Here's what that will look like for each project as it is migrated:
Verify that any external-facing services supported by your project are still working. If they need to be started, start them. If something drastic is happening, notify WMCS staff on IRC (#wikimedia-cloud)
User:Ancheta Wis learn to speak 1/5 7:05 1# (attention, meaning, relevance, memory) fluently 2# 3 4 5 6 7 <--Chris Lonsdale Haskell 43:15 Fundamentals/C9-Lectures-Dr-Erik-Meijer-Functional-Programming-Fundamentals-Chapter-13-of-13 more his references, 59:00 @1:00:57 1:08:28 fixed-point_combinator in Haskell wikibook
Wikipedia server diagram Metawiki Wikimedia Phabricator /help Developer hub Wikidata wikitech tool labs
Hedonil /XTools xtools .php modules infrastructure
icinga.wmflabs server health via Wikipedia:Wikimedia_Labs#Operational_status, i.e., icinga ops status
Clark Glymour 1998 p.9: evaluate factor analysis by 5 steps
ghci mr = (. map) . (.) . reduce ---- foldr
Eric S. Raymond on SCCS RCS CVS SVN ... to follow how to rebuild a C type system
Resting_state_fMRI#Basics_of_fMRI
Thank you for your links, which I will try to enter into salience network.
/info/en/?search=Talk:Categorical_logic#Frege.2C_semigroups.2C_and_the_categorical_view categorical logic
Kleisli category for partial functions
'saliency detection in pulvinar' led to pp319-321 of Ch.13, Smythies, Edelstein, and Ramachandran "Hypotheses relating to the function of the claustrum" The Claustrum: Structural, Functional, and Clinical Neuroscience cf https://books.google.com/books?id=GvccAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA318&lpg=PA318&dq=saliency+detection+in+pulvinar&source=bl&ots=q9LuasK2rU&sig=Xt6DfGk4kuo8Mmc1jgUuFEdcum8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwix79S61OHJAhUQ9GMKHTalBFoQ6AEITjAH#v=onepage&q=saliency%20detection%20in%20pulvinar&f=false
Ian Hacking (Sep., 1988), "Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design", Isis Volume 79, Number 3 Vol. 79, No. 3, A Special Issue on Artifact and Experiment (Sep., 1988), pp. 427-451 p.432 "Stigler writes "Stigler writes 'The Peirce-Jastrow experiment [10 Dec 1883 - 7 Apr 1884] is the first of which I am aware where the experimentation was performed according to a precise mathematically-sound randomization scheme!' [as opposed to Fechner's subjective experiments (1850s) on himself with no assistant and as his own informant (like Galileo's measurements during Mass in the cathedral of Pisa in the 1600s)] " http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/354775
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=folTvNDL08A David Deutsch 2009 A new way to explain explanation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDZ454K_lBY David Deutsch Minute 7:34 interference of single photon by other counterparts in multiverse
http://www.behavior.org/resource.php?id=102 critique of platt's strong inference
http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node6.html jose wukda 1998
https://www.amazon.com/Space-Time-Relativity-Cosmology-Jose-Wudka/dp/0521822807
Goldhaber & Nieto (2008) Photon & Graviton mass limits See Goldhaber 1975 Tacit assumptions
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Neglected_Argument_for_the_Reality_of_God
Semiotic_elements_and_classes_of_signs
Elizabeth Asmis (1984) Epicurus' Scientific Method
Since we are seeing a revert war, might we consider:
I am being vague because these statements could be misused against the existing order. I for one wish to preserve the stability of the existing order. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 01:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Just cause your POV was refuted, nobody considers you "devastated" I take it you agree to inclusion. SPECIFICO talk 00:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC) The stuff you just cited purports to show how Trump and Russia were actively colluding. Clearly, it is relevant to the article: straightforward and to point. As I've already said, I have no problem with your proposed content—ADD IT RIGHT NOW. What I am emphatically against is including a section on Trump's "ties" without any explanation of what they mean or what impact they've had on the election. Is that clear enough? Guccisamsclub (talk) 01:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
700 BCE - 221 BCE
Ludwik Fleck, Thaddeus J. Trenn, Robert K. Merton, Fred Bradley, Thaddeus J. Trenn The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact
The Social Construction of Reality
The social contract
Bob Schieffer replacement for GOP
Mark A. Milley Jun23 2016, on Force regeneration: 18:43/1:00:45, using skeletal advisory brigades to regenerate brigades in 4-5 months. Total Army 37:30/1:00:45
19:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
How appropriate that Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four doublethink is sopping up our attention — instead of ending an ongoing war which started in 1950 [3] — which can still end badly. How bad does it have to get, for us to stop a 3rd generation dictator [4] who executes his own minister of defense in front of his own staff? [5]
ted 100 sites posets in haskell
China's preparations for nuclear war in North Korea [6] appear to be a message to Kim Jong Un. We now have the citations in place for a regime change in the North, [7] or a nuclear test in the North, [8] or a THAAD interception from either South Korea or Kodiak AK, [9] or an ICBM launch from the North, or re-nuclearization of the South, [10] or the defense of Seoul. [11] [12] We need citations for Chinese resistance to reunification of North and South. We need citations for the North's execution of the citizens who build channels to China. We need more citations for the expected refugee flows into China or Siberia. [13]
< ref name=idUSKBN1AH2OU > https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-taiwan-defence-idUSKBN1AH2OU (JULY 31, 2017 / 7:15 PM) China's military confident, prepared to safeguard sovereignty: paper China Daily </ref >
In contrast, a CIA intelligence assessment notes that while the lofted trajectory of the 28 July 2017 Hwasong-14 test caused its breakup on re-entry, data “gathered from ground, sea, and air-based sensors” project that the re-entry vehicle could likely survive a lower-energy trajectory. [14] The 4 July 2017 Hwasong-14 re-entry vehicle survived re-entry down to an altitude of one kilometer. [14]
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 [15]
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018
[16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 [15]
the Cārvāka epistemology states that whenever one infers a truth from a set of observations or truths, one must acknowledge doubt; inferred knowledge is conditional. [33] Lost: Bṛhaspati Sutra 600 BCE
The epistemology of Vaiśeṣika school of Hinduism, like Buddhism, accepted only two reliable means to knowledge - perception and inference. [34] [35] Founder: Kaṇāda Kashyapa 2nd cent BCE
Nyaya school's epistemology accepts four out of six Pramanas as reliable means of gaining knowledge – Pratyakṣa (perception), Anumāṇa (inference), Upamāṇa (comparison and analogy) and Śabda (word, testimony of past or present reliable experts). [36] [37] [38] Akṣapāda Gautama 2nd cent CE
Skepticism started with Pyrrhonism 4th cent BCE ;
Mara Beller (2007) intellectual property, royal society p.27 http://www.jstor.org/stable/23354463?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
von Neumann, John (1956) "natural science took 1000 years to get anywhere" Collected Works von Neumann 6p.101, as cited on Rashid (Jul.,2007) p518 p518 via JSTOR]
Mackay, R.W., & Oldford, R.W., (Aug. 2000) p.277:"statistical method as we have described it (PPDAC) is not the same as the scientific method. It is about investigating phenomena as they related to populations of units." http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676665?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Jeffreys (1934) http://www.jstor.org/stable/2935474?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
http://www.jstor.org/stable/30025388 Tyler Cowen, ed. (1988) The theory of market failure: a critical examination 384pp. Reviewed in Public Choice pp295-7 by Richard Wagner (Jan 1991) 68 (1/3). In Cowen's selection, the 1st two essays are Samuelson 1954, Frances M. Bator 1958. Bator's -- Lighthouses, bees, bridges are illustrations of market failures that require govt remedy.
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Price_Theory/PThy_Chapter_18/PThy_Chap_18.html
/info/en/?search=Kaldor%E2%80%93Hicks_efficiency improvement Kaldor Hicks_efficiency [2] Pareto efficiency game theory (in which there are winners and losers) Nash's solution of prisoner's dilemma what is Nash equilibrium?
Nomothetic and idiographic Deductive-nomological model Models_of_scientific_inquiry visual system http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-dress-a-black-and-blue-debate-over-the-color-of-a-dress-stirs-social-media-1425063162?google_editors_picks=true
SEID http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-a-real-measurable-illness-researchers-1.2257005 cytokine
http://news.discovery.com/tech/photo-first-lights-captured-as-both-particle-and-wave-150302.htm
Charles Singer, How did Science Begin? http://www.jstor.org/stable/25371610?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
it has been known since Hume that " induction has no logical basis" (FP Ramsey's review, in Mind, New Series, Vol. 32, No. 128 (Oct., 1923), pp. 465-478 , of Wittgenstein TLP ). But induction is being mooted as the basis for generalization in science. Gauch 2003 proposes that Aristotle used induction, followed by deduction, in repeated steps to stabilize generalizations. This cannot be true, on the face of it, based on Hume. Others use Aristotle's thoughts about intuition as his basis for building generalizations. But Aristotle proposed some pretty bad generalizations which are taught in schools as counterexamples, today, such as teleological reasoning (which he instituted in spite of his own statements in Organon about the fallacy of affirming the consequent.)
What lessons can we take from this? One is the effect of overweening authority, which was used to execute Socrates, and to hold Aristotle in Plato's place, and blind Aristotle enough to institute Plato's teleological reasoning as the basis for biology for two thousand years, and to influence Galen's and Ptolemy's and Alhacen's theories of vision, and to hold even Catholicism in its sway for 700 years after Averroes. An impressive piece of science, which eventually fell of its own weight. And even after Hume's work, his views still call others to burn his 'wee bookies', to this day. Apparently, there is still market demand for overweening authority.
Rather than induction, C.S. Peirce proposed abduction as the basis for science. In order to accomplish this, some hold that arrays of Hypotheses are the missing pieces, while others hold that models ought to take the place of hypotheses. [1] The hypothetico-deductive model is one approach to model science. Platt's strong inference (1964) is a model of an array of alternate hypotheses to be tested by experiment.
So why don't we just say these things outright? And move on. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 17:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Science reawakened in 800 after a sleep of 600 years. -- Islamic Science reignited optics and Aristotle for Europe. In the meantime, Science had never been lost in China, which was overtaken by Europe, and which seeks to regain eminence for the next 500 years, as Europe stumbles, While America enters sleep state after the end of the supercollider.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/23354463?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Wivagg http://www.jstor.org/stable/4451400?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Karsai & Kampis http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.9?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Speice & Colosi http://www.jstor.org/stable/4450823?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
McLaughlin http://www.jstor.org/stable/25504263?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2176001?seq=8#page_scan_tab_contents De partibus animalium, two methods: finality > necessity
Democritus -420 BCE
Aristoteles -350 BCE - Alhacen - Scholastics - ended with Kepler/ Francis Bacon, Descartes
Asmis, Elizabeth (1984) Epicurus' Scientific method 42 (January 1984), pp.386 Cornell University Press ISBN 978-0-8014-6682-3 pp.333-6 via JSTOR
In his lost work Kαvώv ('canon', a straight edge or ruler, thus any type of measure or standard, referred to as 'canonic'), Epicurus laid out his first rule for inquiry (p.20) in physics:'that the first concepts be seen, and that they not require demonstration (pp.35-47)'.
His second rule for inquiry was that prior to an investigation, we are to have self-evident concepts (pp.61-80), so that we might have the means to infer [έχωμεν οις σημειωσόμεύα] both what is expected [τò ποσμένον] and also what is non-apparent [τò άδηλον] (pp.83-103).
Epicurus applies his method of inference (the use of observations as signs, pp.175-196 -- summary p.333: the method of using the phenomena as signs(σημεīα) of what is unobserved) immediately to the atomic theory of Democritus. In Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Aristotle himself employs the use of signs (pp.212-224). But Epicurus presented his 'canonic' as rival to Aristotle's logic (pp.19-34).
Epicurus' Scientific method, fl -300 BCE
Stoicism fl -280 BCE - end of Rome, its canonical belief system
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/01/aristotle_on_th093021.html Aristotle on the Immateriality of Intellect and Will
http://books.google.com/books?id=-8A_auBvyFoC&pg=PA178&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false Maurolico's Photisme, Lindberg (1981) p.178 ch.9
http://www.nature.com/eye/journal/v18/n11/fig_tab/6701578f2.html optic chiasma sketch from manuscript copy of Kitab al manazir (1083), in the Fatih collection, Süleymaniye Library, Istanbul
http://www.academia.edu/6608048/The_Book_of_Optics_Ibn_Al_Haytham_Alhazen
So, tracing back, the flow of knowledge appears to have been:
replace ontology: Aristotelian with materialist Smith on Koyre
Nils Nilsson 2014 escape belief traps by exposure to criticism
Stiles 1942 personal habits/ prequisite for scientific method via JSTOR
Lester S. King 1984 Medical thinking via JSTOR
Harold N. Lee 1943 3 good pages 69-70 via JSTOR
Lawson 2010 A better set of questions ala Platt 1964's 4 steps via JSTOR
Donald S. Lee 1968 p.36 via JSTOR
Randall 1940 Padua ---> Galileo via JSTOR
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2855089?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Euclid's Optics] [ http://philomatica.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Optics-of-Euclid.pdf fig.58 visual pyramid, eye looks down, positioned along Z axis
JSTOR:
A. Mark Smith (2004) "What is the history of Medieval Optics Really About?" via JSTOR
al-Haytham -> Kamal al-Din Hasan ibn Ali ibn Hasan al-Farisi ->? Latin translation for al-Haytham
Friedrich Risner, publ. 1572. Opticae Thesaurus: Alhazeni Arabis Libri Septem Nunc Primum Editi , Eiusdem Liber De Crepusculis Et Nubium Asensionibus . Item Vitellonis Thuringopoloni Libri X. Sabra, the authorship of Liber de crepusculis
Admiral Eugene of Sicily, translated Ptolemy's optics (he knew Greek (native), Arabic (fluent), and some Latin), Smith (1988), p.192, but who was the 1st translator of Alhacen into Latin? Gregor Reisch, Margarita philosophica (Basel 1504) - Tower of knowledge
Smith, A. Mark (1981), "Getting the Big Picture in Perspectivist Optics" Isis 72(4) (Dec., 1981). via JSTOR, pp. 568-589 Alhazen -> Roger Bacon -> Witelo -> John Pecham ->
Grossteste's non experimental law of refraction
There is no doubt that Ibn Sahl understood the sine law of refraction (Harriot, Snell, Descartes, Newton) Alhacen didn't have Ibn Sahl's law of refraction Smith 2015
{{
citation}}
: Check |jstor=
value (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) cxvi: Alhacen is a synthesis; cxvii:revolution in optics started by Kepler, completed by Newtonhypothetico-deductive: 91,vol.1,p.cxv, 100.vol.1,p.c
Alhacen's Theory of Visual Perception: A Critical Edition, with ..., Book I 91 Volume 1
Smith 2015 from sight to light, reviewed, audio link
R.A. Herman (1900) A treatise on geometrical optics Cambridge p.160 Newton's prism experiment camera obscura, imaged the sun, which subtends one half degree
Al Seckel (2006), ULTIMATE BOOK OF OPTICAL ILLUSIONS ISBN 9781402734045 "Perceiving What Is Not There"
[[File:New medical editor.ogv|thumb|thumbtime=2:59|right|320px|Welcome to Wikipedia and [[WP:MED|Wikiproject Medicine]]]] Take one lame and decrepit female hyena ... how to prepare a medicine, from Cairo Genizah
Gehirn map gyrus basal ganglia short arcuate fibers in cortex
Buchsbaum 1980 "A spatial processor model for object colour perception" Hsien-Che Lee 1986 "Method for computing the scene-illuminant chromaticity from specular highlights " van Trigt C. (1997 ) "Visual system-response functions and estimating reflectance." Wired (2015 ) "The Science of Why No One Agrees on the Color of This Dress" Color constancy Golz & Kiel (2002 ) " Influence of scene statistics on colour constancy" [ ( ) ""] [ ( ) ""]
http://www.wired.com/2015/02/people-willing-dismiss-evidence-psychology-brain-science/
http://gizmodo.com/octopus-eyes-are-crazier-than-we-imagined-1783195433
http://www.pnas.org/content/113/29/8206.full
data | if | let | module | as |
instance | then | in | import | hiding |
type | else | case | infix | default |
newtype | do | of | infixl | foreign |
class | deriving | where | infixr |
User:49.205.218.102 (talk | contribs) User:89.164.107.42 (talk | contribs) User:Alan U. Kennington (talk | history | contribs) User:Alanscottwalker (talk | history | contribs) User:Ancheta Wis (talk | history | contribs) User:Ancheta Wis/1st Space Brigade (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/Definition (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/Land tenure (case) (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/PaJaMo experiment (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/Shmuel Sambursky (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/common.css (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/common.js (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/sandbox (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/scratch page (talk | history) User:Bob123345435577998578645636546486757566587667 (talk | contribs) User:BrownHairedGirl (talk | history | contribs) User:CoolSkittle (talk | history | contribs) User:Crazynas (talk | history | contribs) User:DannyS712 (talk | history | contribs) User:Evelynbreit (talk | contribs) User:Finnusertop (talk | history | contribs) User:Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk | history | contribs) User:Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | history | contribs) User:GoldenRing (talk | history | contribs) User:Graeme Bartlett (talk | history | contribs) User:Hedonil (talk | history | contribs) User:Hodgdon's secret garden (talk | history | contribs) User:Inowen (talk | history | contribs) User:Johnuniq (talk | history | contribs) User:Legacypac (talk | history | contribs) User:Looie496 (talk | history | contribs) User:Manning Bartlett (talk | history | contribs) User:Moxy (talk | history | contribs) User:Primefac (talk | history | contribs) User:Prof. Carl Hewitt (talk | history | contribs) User:Quarkgluonsoup (talk | history | contribs) User:Ramadut (talk | contribs) User:Robert McClenon (talk | history | contribs) User:Simonmar (talk | history | contribs) User:TheDJ (talk | history | contribs) User:The Interior (talk | history | contribs) User:The Patriot Way (talk | history | contribs) User:The Transhumanist (talk | history | contribs) User:Truth19890604 (talk | contribs) User:UnitedStatesian (talk | history | contribs) User:Waggers (talk | history | contribs) User:X! (talk | history | contribs) User:Xamgore (talk | contribs) User:חופש (talk | contribs)
Lindberg 1976, theories of vision Alhazen's Synthesis .. Kepler .. Galileo thread documents a Lindberg statement vis a vis Kepler's familiarity with Alhazen
Author Charles_Sanders_Peirce Bowman L. Clarke (1977) Peirce's Neglected argument
Rate of language evolution is affected by population size
Greeno Moore Smith 1993 "Transfer of situated learning" Peel's principles
Christine Ladd-Franklin (1847-1930), as part of her Ph.D. dissertation in logic under C.S. Peirce, formulated a 16-row truth table [1] in form like that of Wittgenstein (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Proposition 5.101.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4450956?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Hypothetico-Deductive&searchText=Reasoning&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DHypothetico-Deductive%2BReasoning%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D&seq=14#page_scan_tab_contents Anton E. LawsonThe Generality of Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning: Making Scientific Thinking Explicit
https://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/nif/seab0110.pdf nif interim report 10 jan 2000
http://ciog6.army.mil/Portals/1/ANCP/Army%20CIO-G6%20Overview%20%2817%20Feb%2015%29.pdf Army CIO/G-6
http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2014/pdf/bmds/2014gmd.pdf
http://ed-thelen.org/digest1.html#p15
http://www.army.mil/article/133461/94th__32nd__263rd_AAMDC_Mark_Milestone_Supporting_UFG__14/
http://www.army.mil/article/166098/End_of_year__use_it_or_lose_it__budget_mindset_to_get_tossed/ new mindset for budget
In a related question, there appears to be a division of function between the "
AMC" (materiel), "
TRADOC" (training and doctrine), and "
FORSCOM" (operations) aspects of the A
rmy; in the case of the
THAAD batteries, for example, on Fort Bliss, the Army developed the materiel, trained the Soldiers, and deployed the units; in an Army example,
32nd Army Air & Missile Defense Command takes the lead in specifying, training, and deploying the equipment and Soldiers. But if the deployed
THAAD batteries were to defend against a missile attack on the nation,
Ninth Air Force directs the missile defense.
So for cyber, it appears, again, that the Army takes the lead in specifying, hardening, and deploying the system/ network, but in an operational event (probably not a hot war), joint DoD-level command takes over. True? -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 20:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
DoD satellite swarms in play, Washington Post 10May2016
https://www.army.mil/article/169567/improving_army_readiness_for_the_21st_century Lt Gen Dail, formerly headed Defense Logistics Agency
http://www.wsmr.army.mil/Pages/newhome.aspx WSMR
https://www.army.mil/article/170918/two_years_of_hard_work_pays_off_for_soldiers_at_national_training_center 2 yrs for NG 1/34 ID to prepare a nationwide muster to NTC
https://www.army.mil/article/164377/Future_of_deployments__surge_ready_and_rotationally_focused/ readiness in FORSCOM
http://www.reuters.com/news/picture/us-completes-complex-test-of-layered-mis?articleId=USKCN0SQ2GR20151102&slideId=1091520709 THAAD U.S. completes complex test of layered missile defense system
https://www.army.mil/article/171316/us_to_deploy_thaad_missile_battery_to_south_korea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7ErnJU_ghE 2015 THAAD FTO2 Event2a
2016ArmyReservePostureStatement .pdf cb1
Army_2020_Charts .pdf cb1
https://www.army.mil/article/176036/army_operations_tempo_near_wartime_high
https://www.army.mil/article/175469/changing_nature_of_war_wont_change_our_purpose
http://gao.gov/assets/660/654289.pdf
http://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-07-1.pdf
Recently, Jin-Woo Han and Meyya Meyyappan (23 Jun 2014) Vacuum Transistor, NASA Ames Research Center, prototyped a 460 gigahertz, 10V device
chain reaction critical mass Critical mass (disambiguation) Salience kinetic corpuscularianism, the second transformation Chain of events Stability Solution (disambiguation)
To separate this thread from the previous, I document my findings from H. Floris Cohen (2010) How Modern Science Came Into The World: four civilizations, one 17th century breakthrough, which is a 'big-picture' survey, based on his (1994) The Scientific Revolution: a Historiographical Inquiry, upon which he builds, except for its last chapter, which was his 1994 view, and which is now replaced by his 2010 book.
0: H. Floris Cohen notes that history of science mixes the influences on 'science' into such a large pot, that its study has become inconclusive (Needham says 'bankrupt'). He argues that previous translations of primary sources, which translate a word as 'science', ought to translate it as 'nature-knowledge' instead. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 11:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Citation: H. Floris Cohen (2010) How modern science came into the world: four civilizations, one 17th century breakthrough ISBN 9789089642394 . H. Floris Cohen is a Dutchman and historiographer. He might serve as a secondary or tertiary source for the article. He also wrote (1994) The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry. The 1994 book started with 60 ideas which he reviewed for their influence on Scientific Revolutions. Its last chapter served as the basis for his 2010 book, which he began in 1994. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 20:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
@Vormeph, here is evidence directly contradicting your latest edit, which places English in the family of Negative Concord grammars:
William Labov (1972) "Negative Attraction and Negative Concord in English Grammar" Language 48(4) pp.773-818, has found that negative concord is a variable feature in English. In contrast, negative attraction to the word 'any' is invariant across all dialects of English. All attempts to remove 'not' from the phrase 'not any' are invariably rejected as nongrammatical.
The JSTOR citation: @article{1972
In summary, the various dialects of English occupy the spectrum of use of negative concord, from none at all, to obligatory. It appears that you ought to revert your edit. On the bright side, you just might find support for your position in other articles published by Linguistic Society of America. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 05:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
One of the advantages of this article is that it explicitly lists some
abuses of notation which in fact are being handled systematically by some of the
functional languages such as
Haskell. As humans, we subconsciously skip over the abuses, in poetic fashion, and get right to the
point, or semantics. In Haskell, some of these formulaic expressions are in fact recognized as partially grammatical thunks (thought-chunks), and are held in abeyance by the compiler for filling-in at some point in the lifetime of the expression. Although Haskell allows
Unicode, and could save away thunks such as
as humans, we parse this thunk as a "hungry operator" (to use Feynman's terminology) which doesn't bother us.
It may help to insert inline wp:tags, such as {{discuss}}, into the article to highlight just what needs to be explicitly expanded for the literal-minded readers among us.-- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 16:45, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
When following-up the page needed tag on the claim by Ben-Chaim 2004, I used JSTOR. The JSTOR review does not back up Ben-Chaim, but cites Westfall. I am inclined to drop Ben-Chaim in favor of Westfall (1980) Never at Rest. From my reading of Westfall, Westfall notes that when Newton was a child, he had a popular science book for children on how to do various mechanical projects, on a child's level, and he built the gadgets from the book: miniature mills, machines, carts, and other inventions. He certainly had a lot of time on the farm at Grantham, because he couldn't even watch his step-father's sheep, he was so preoccupied. His maternal uncle intervened to persuade his stepfather to send him to Trinity. By 1666, when Newton was 24, he was back at Grantham because of the plague scare. There, Newton formulated the inverse square law. Newton studied Opticks in his room at Trinity, etc. What Ben-Chaim attributes to Locke, etc. was 'in the air' of England. It was even obvious to the author of that children's book that Newton had. Newton had studied the same theorems we learned in Freshman Calculus from Isaac Barrow, who invented fluxions (differential calculus, independent of Leibniz). That's why Newton didn't claim Calculus as his own theory, even though Newton invented inverse fluxions (integrals), and wrote his book on fluxions so late. Westfall named Newton's biography Never at Rest because Newton's mind was never at rest.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2689412?loggedin=true&seq=10#page_scan_tab_contents 3 crises The Three Crises in Mathematics: Logicism, Intuitionism and Formalism
Location for discussion of the Lede Image. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 16:08, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
The Feynman Lectures on Physics Chapter 5, Volume I, last diagram, maps distances to objects, ranging from the radius of a nucleus to the edge of the universe The previous chapters cover 1: & 2:the nature of things (the atomic theory), time, space, physical phenomena. 3:The relation of physics to other sciences 4:Energy So to me, the disputed image covers all this, and Chapter 5, Volume I, last diagram covers all the objects of the image, versus a distance scale. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 17:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
... macroscopic...is incorrectly in small scale. Widefox; talk 19:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Well that at least has hope of being something appropriate. I'd rather start from a blank slate and decide what the image should contain first, go from there to decide on what the elements of that image should be. The three main divisions we have in the article are a) natural sciences b) social sciences c) formal sciences. So going by that, we need three things
Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 01:33, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
References
-- Ancheta Wis ( talk) 22:52, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators'_guide xTools
"dry convective helical vortices" (DHCVs) [1]
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/whirlwinds-crystals-called-gravel-devils-spotted-andes-mountains
http://geology.gsapubs.org/content/early/2017/03/15/G38901.1.abstract
the microseismic fluctuations in the elastic vibration of Earth's crust at equilibrium, [2]
Wikipedian QM expert, Caroline Thompson (d.2006)
Required speed for an ABM, citation: Rather than a citation for "an ICBM simply moves too fast for these systems", I propose a geometric proof. Would this satisfy the editors? I could provide a sketch of the proof on the talk page, if the editors like. The article would then have a note, rather than a footnote. OK?
There are only a few exact solutions to Schrödinger's equation; the hydrogen atom's electron orbitals is one of them (source: R.P. Feynman, my lecture notes). It's an exact picture of the electron's shape, at various excitations. A spherical shape would be the most common shape for an electron at the lowest energy state. The mathematical form of Schrödinger's equation is called a functional.
Staddon (2017) argues it is a mistake to try following rules[16] which are best learned through careful study of examples of scientific investigation.
https://phys.org/news/2018-12-harnessing-power-orbit-coupling-silicon.html
It may be useful to point out that Haskell development is evolving. At one time, monads were in the spotlight, but functors, applicatives, and monads show that there is a spectrum of 'monadic' behavior: "a monad is just a monoid in the category of endofunctors, what's the problem?" —humorously attributed to Philip Wadler. The interesting point about Haskell is that applications using monads are already out there in industrial settings as in Haxl.
after reading the article in its second pass, it is not Haskell-centric; the notation, I think, might be more like ML, or perhaps ordinary mathematical notation. Some of the lexemes, such as ==
I admit I read as 'is equal to', rather than =
which in Haskell is 'is assigned to be'. If it were Haskell, the :
would be ::
instead, which means 'has type'.
Once we have some more hardware allocated to the eqiad1 region we will start migrating projects in earnest. Here's what that will look like for each project as it is migrated:
Verify that any external-facing services supported by your project are still working. If they need to be started, start them. If something drastic is happening, notify WMCS staff on IRC (#wikimedia-cloud)
User:Ancheta Wis learn to speak 1/5 7:05 1# (attention, meaning, relevance, memory) fluently 2# 3 4 5 6 7 <--Chris Lonsdale Haskell 43:15 Fundamentals/C9-Lectures-Dr-Erik-Meijer-Functional-Programming-Fundamentals-Chapter-13-of-13 more his references, 59:00 @1:00:57 1:08:28 fixed-point_combinator in Haskell wikibook
Wikipedia server diagram Metawiki Wikimedia Phabricator /help Developer hub Wikidata wikitech tool labs
Hedonil /XTools xtools .php modules infrastructure
icinga.wmflabs server health via Wikipedia:Wikimedia_Labs#Operational_status, i.e., icinga ops status
Clark Glymour 1998 p.9: evaluate factor analysis by 5 steps
ghci mr = (. map) . (.) . reduce ---- foldr
Eric S. Raymond on SCCS RCS CVS SVN ... to follow how to rebuild a C type system
Resting_state_fMRI#Basics_of_fMRI
Thank you for your links, which I will try to enter into salience network.
/info/en/?search=Talk:Categorical_logic#Frege.2C_semigroups.2C_and_the_categorical_view categorical logic
Kleisli category for partial functions
'saliency detection in pulvinar' led to pp319-321 of Ch.13, Smythies, Edelstein, and Ramachandran "Hypotheses relating to the function of the claustrum" The Claustrum: Structural, Functional, and Clinical Neuroscience cf https://books.google.com/books?id=GvccAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA318&lpg=PA318&dq=saliency+detection+in+pulvinar&source=bl&ots=q9LuasK2rU&sig=Xt6DfGk4kuo8Mmc1jgUuFEdcum8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwix79S61OHJAhUQ9GMKHTalBFoQ6AEITjAH#v=onepage&q=saliency%20detection%20in%20pulvinar&f=false
Ian Hacking (Sep., 1988), "Telepathy: Origins of Randomization in Experimental Design", Isis Volume 79, Number 3 Vol. 79, No. 3, A Special Issue on Artifact and Experiment (Sep., 1988), pp. 427-451 p.432 "Stigler writes "Stigler writes 'The Peirce-Jastrow experiment [10 Dec 1883 - 7 Apr 1884] is the first of which I am aware where the experimentation was performed according to a precise mathematically-sound randomization scheme!' [as opposed to Fechner's subjective experiments (1850s) on himself with no assistant and as his own informant (like Galileo's measurements during Mass in the cathedral of Pisa in the 1600s)] " http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/354775
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=folTvNDL08A David Deutsch 2009 A new way to explain explanation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDZ454K_lBY David Deutsch Minute 7:34 interference of single photon by other counterparts in multiverse
http://www.behavior.org/resource.php?id=102 critique of platt's strong inference
http://physics.ucr.edu/~wudka/Physics7/Notes_www/node6.html jose wukda 1998
https://www.amazon.com/Space-Time-Relativity-Cosmology-Jose-Wudka/dp/0521822807
Goldhaber & Nieto (2008) Photon & Graviton mass limits See Goldhaber 1975 Tacit assumptions
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/A_Neglected_Argument_for_the_Reality_of_God
Semiotic_elements_and_classes_of_signs
Elizabeth Asmis (1984) Epicurus' Scientific Method
Since we are seeing a revert war, might we consider:
I am being vague because these statements could be misused against the existing order. I for one wish to preserve the stability of the existing order. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 01:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Just cause your POV was refuted, nobody considers you "devastated" I take it you agree to inclusion. SPECIFICO talk 00:40, 18 February 2017 (UTC) The stuff you just cited purports to show how Trump and Russia were actively colluding. Clearly, it is relevant to the article: straightforward and to point. As I've already said, I have no problem with your proposed content—ADD IT RIGHT NOW. What I am emphatically against is including a section on Trump's "ties" without any explanation of what they mean or what impact they've had on the election. Is that clear enough? Guccisamsclub (talk) 01:14, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
700 BCE - 221 BCE
Ludwik Fleck, Thaddeus J. Trenn, Robert K. Merton, Fred Bradley, Thaddeus J. Trenn The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact
The Social Construction of Reality
The social contract
Bob Schieffer replacement for GOP
Mark A. Milley Jun23 2016, on Force regeneration: 18:43/1:00:45, using skeletal advisory brigades to regenerate brigades in 4-5 months. Total Army 37:30/1:00:45
19:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
How appropriate that Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four doublethink is sopping up our attention — instead of ending an ongoing war which started in 1950 [3] — which can still end badly. How bad does it have to get, for us to stop a 3rd generation dictator [4] who executes his own minister of defense in front of his own staff? [5]
ted 100 sites posets in haskell
China's preparations for nuclear war in North Korea [6] appear to be a message to Kim Jong Un. We now have the citations in place for a regime change in the North, [7] or a nuclear test in the North, [8] or a THAAD interception from either South Korea or Kodiak AK, [9] or an ICBM launch from the North, or re-nuclearization of the South, [10] or the defense of Seoul. [11] [12] We need citations for Chinese resistance to reunification of North and South. We need citations for the North's execution of the citizens who build channels to China. We need more citations for the expected refugee flows into China or Siberia. [13]
< ref name=idUSKBN1AH2OU > https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-taiwan-defence-idUSKBN1AH2OU (JULY 31, 2017 / 7:15 PM) China's military confident, prepared to safeguard sovereignty: paper China Daily </ref >
In contrast, a CIA intelligence assessment notes that while the lofted trajectory of the 28 July 2017 Hwasong-14 test caused its breakup on re-entry, data “gathered from ground, sea, and air-based sensors” project that the re-entry vehicle could likely survive a lower-energy trajectory. [14] The 4 July 2017 Hwasong-14 re-entry vehicle survived re-entry down to an altitude of one kilometer. [14]
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 [15]
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018
[16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 [15]
the Cārvāka epistemology states that whenever one infers a truth from a set of observations or truths, one must acknowledge doubt; inferred knowledge is conditional. [33] Lost: Bṛhaspati Sutra 600 BCE
The epistemology of Vaiśeṣika school of Hinduism, like Buddhism, accepted only two reliable means to knowledge - perception and inference. [34] [35] Founder: Kaṇāda Kashyapa 2nd cent BCE
Nyaya school's epistemology accepts four out of six Pramanas as reliable means of gaining knowledge – Pratyakṣa (perception), Anumāṇa (inference), Upamāṇa (comparison and analogy) and Śabda (word, testimony of past or present reliable experts). [36] [37] [38] Akṣapāda Gautama 2nd cent CE
Skepticism started with Pyrrhonism 4th cent BCE ;
Mara Beller (2007) intellectual property, royal society p.27 http://www.jstor.org/stable/23354463?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
von Neumann, John (1956) "natural science took 1000 years to get anywhere" Collected Works von Neumann 6p.101, as cited on Rashid (Jul.,2007) p518 p518 via JSTOR]
Mackay, R.W., & Oldford, R.W., (Aug. 2000) p.277:"statistical method as we have described it (PPDAC) is not the same as the scientific method. It is about investigating phenomena as they related to populations of units." http://www.jstor.org/stable/2676665?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Jeffreys (1934) http://www.jstor.org/stable/2935474?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
http://www.jstor.org/stable/30025388 Tyler Cowen, ed. (1988) The theory of market failure: a critical examination 384pp. Reviewed in Public Choice pp295-7 by Richard Wagner (Jan 1991) 68 (1/3). In Cowen's selection, the 1st two essays are Samuelson 1954, Frances M. Bator 1958. Bator's -- Lighthouses, bees, bridges are illustrations of market failures that require govt remedy.
http://www.daviddfriedman.com/Academic/Price_Theory/PThy_Chapter_18/PThy_Chap_18.html
/info/en/?search=Kaldor%E2%80%93Hicks_efficiency improvement Kaldor Hicks_efficiency [2] Pareto efficiency game theory (in which there are winners and losers) Nash's solution of prisoner's dilemma what is Nash equilibrium?
Nomothetic and idiographic Deductive-nomological model Models_of_scientific_inquiry visual system http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-dress-a-black-and-blue-debate-over-the-color-of-a-dress-stirs-social-media-1425063162?google_editors_picks=true
SEID http://www.ctvnews.ca/health/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-a-real-measurable-illness-researchers-1.2257005 cytokine
http://news.discovery.com/tech/photo-first-lights-captured-as-both-particle-and-wave-150302.htm
Charles Singer, How did Science Begin? http://www.jstor.org/stable/25371610?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
it has been known since Hume that " induction has no logical basis" (FP Ramsey's review, in Mind, New Series, Vol. 32, No. 128 (Oct., 1923), pp. 465-478 , of Wittgenstein TLP ). But induction is being mooted as the basis for generalization in science. Gauch 2003 proposes that Aristotle used induction, followed by deduction, in repeated steps to stabilize generalizations. This cannot be true, on the face of it, based on Hume. Others use Aristotle's thoughts about intuition as his basis for building generalizations. But Aristotle proposed some pretty bad generalizations which are taught in schools as counterexamples, today, such as teleological reasoning (which he instituted in spite of his own statements in Organon about the fallacy of affirming the consequent.)
What lessons can we take from this? One is the effect of overweening authority, which was used to execute Socrates, and to hold Aristotle in Plato's place, and blind Aristotle enough to institute Plato's teleological reasoning as the basis for biology for two thousand years, and to influence Galen's and Ptolemy's and Alhacen's theories of vision, and to hold even Catholicism in its sway for 700 years after Averroes. An impressive piece of science, which eventually fell of its own weight. And even after Hume's work, his views still call others to burn his 'wee bookies', to this day. Apparently, there is still market demand for overweening authority.
Rather than induction, C.S. Peirce proposed abduction as the basis for science. In order to accomplish this, some hold that arrays of Hypotheses are the missing pieces, while others hold that models ought to take the place of hypotheses. [1] The hypothetico-deductive model is one approach to model science. Platt's strong inference (1964) is a model of an array of alternate hypotheses to be tested by experiment.
So why don't we just say these things outright? And move on. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 17:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Science reawakened in 800 after a sleep of 600 years. -- Islamic Science reignited optics and Aristotle for Europe. In the meantime, Science had never been lost in China, which was overtaken by Europe, and which seeks to regain eminence for the next 500 years, as Europe stumbles, While America enters sleep state after the end of the supercollider.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/23354463?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Wivagg http://www.jstor.org/stable/4451400?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Karsai & Kampis http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/bio.2010.60.8.9?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Speice & Colosi http://www.jstor.org/stable/4450823?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
McLaughlin http://www.jstor.org/stable/25504263?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2176001?seq=8#page_scan_tab_contents De partibus animalium, two methods: finality > necessity
Democritus -420 BCE
Aristoteles -350 BCE - Alhacen - Scholastics - ended with Kepler/ Francis Bacon, Descartes
Asmis, Elizabeth (1984) Epicurus' Scientific method 42 (January 1984), pp.386 Cornell University Press ISBN 978-0-8014-6682-3 pp.333-6 via JSTOR
In his lost work Kαvώv ('canon', a straight edge or ruler, thus any type of measure or standard, referred to as 'canonic'), Epicurus laid out his first rule for inquiry (p.20) in physics:'that the first concepts be seen, and that they not require demonstration (pp.35-47)'.
His second rule for inquiry was that prior to an investigation, we are to have self-evident concepts (pp.61-80), so that we might have the means to infer [έχωμεν οις σημειωσόμεύα] both what is expected [τò ποσμένον] and also what is non-apparent [τò άδηλον] (pp.83-103).
Epicurus applies his method of inference (the use of observations as signs, pp.175-196 -- summary p.333: the method of using the phenomena as signs(σημεīα) of what is unobserved) immediately to the atomic theory of Democritus. In Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Aristotle himself employs the use of signs (pp.212-224). But Epicurus presented his 'canonic' as rival to Aristotle's logic (pp.19-34).
Epicurus' Scientific method, fl -300 BCE
Stoicism fl -280 BCE - end of Rome, its canonical belief system
http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/01/aristotle_on_th093021.html Aristotle on the Immateriality of Intellect and Will
http://books.google.com/books?id=-8A_auBvyFoC&pg=PA178&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=4#v=onepage&q&f=false Maurolico's Photisme, Lindberg (1981) p.178 ch.9
http://www.nature.com/eye/journal/v18/n11/fig_tab/6701578f2.html optic chiasma sketch from manuscript copy of Kitab al manazir (1083), in the Fatih collection, Süleymaniye Library, Istanbul
http://www.academia.edu/6608048/The_Book_of_Optics_Ibn_Al_Haytham_Alhazen
So, tracing back, the flow of knowledge appears to have been:
replace ontology: Aristotelian with materialist Smith on Koyre
Nils Nilsson 2014 escape belief traps by exposure to criticism
Stiles 1942 personal habits/ prequisite for scientific method via JSTOR
Lester S. King 1984 Medical thinking via JSTOR
Harold N. Lee 1943 3 good pages 69-70 via JSTOR
Lawson 2010 A better set of questions ala Platt 1964's 4 steps via JSTOR
Donald S. Lee 1968 p.36 via JSTOR
Randall 1940 Padua ---> Galileo via JSTOR
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2855089?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Euclid's Optics] [ http://philomatica.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Optics-of-Euclid.pdf fig.58 visual pyramid, eye looks down, positioned along Z axis
JSTOR:
A. Mark Smith (2004) "What is the history of Medieval Optics Really About?" via JSTOR
al-Haytham -> Kamal al-Din Hasan ibn Ali ibn Hasan al-Farisi ->? Latin translation for al-Haytham
Friedrich Risner, publ. 1572. Opticae Thesaurus: Alhazeni Arabis Libri Septem Nunc Primum Editi , Eiusdem Liber De Crepusculis Et Nubium Asensionibus . Item Vitellonis Thuringopoloni Libri X. Sabra, the authorship of Liber de crepusculis
Admiral Eugene of Sicily, translated Ptolemy's optics (he knew Greek (native), Arabic (fluent), and some Latin), Smith (1988), p.192, but who was the 1st translator of Alhacen into Latin? Gregor Reisch, Margarita philosophica (Basel 1504) - Tower of knowledge
Smith, A. Mark (1981), "Getting the Big Picture in Perspectivist Optics" Isis 72(4) (Dec., 1981). via JSTOR, pp. 568-589 Alhazen -> Roger Bacon -> Witelo -> John Pecham ->
Grossteste's non experimental law of refraction
There is no doubt that Ibn Sahl understood the sine law of refraction (Harriot, Snell, Descartes, Newton) Alhacen didn't have Ibn Sahl's law of refraction Smith 2015
{{
citation}}
: Check |jstor=
value (
help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link) cxvi: Alhacen is a synthesis; cxvii:revolution in optics started by Kepler, completed by Newtonhypothetico-deductive: 91,vol.1,p.cxv, 100.vol.1,p.c
Alhacen's Theory of Visual Perception: A Critical Edition, with ..., Book I 91 Volume 1
Smith 2015 from sight to light, reviewed, audio link
R.A. Herman (1900) A treatise on geometrical optics Cambridge p.160 Newton's prism experiment camera obscura, imaged the sun, which subtends one half degree
Al Seckel (2006), ULTIMATE BOOK OF OPTICAL ILLUSIONS ISBN 9781402734045 "Perceiving What Is Not There"
[[File:New medical editor.ogv|thumb|thumbtime=2:59|right|320px|Welcome to Wikipedia and [[WP:MED|Wikiproject Medicine]]]] Take one lame and decrepit female hyena ... how to prepare a medicine, from Cairo Genizah
Gehirn map gyrus basal ganglia short arcuate fibers in cortex
Buchsbaum 1980 "A spatial processor model for object colour perception" Hsien-Che Lee 1986 "Method for computing the scene-illuminant chromaticity from specular highlights " van Trigt C. (1997 ) "Visual system-response functions and estimating reflectance." Wired (2015 ) "The Science of Why No One Agrees on the Color of This Dress" Color constancy Golz & Kiel (2002 ) " Influence of scene statistics on colour constancy" [ ( ) ""] [ ( ) ""]
http://www.wired.com/2015/02/people-willing-dismiss-evidence-psychology-brain-science/
http://gizmodo.com/octopus-eyes-are-crazier-than-we-imagined-1783195433
http://www.pnas.org/content/113/29/8206.full
data | if | let | module | as |
instance | then | in | import | hiding |
type | else | case | infix | default |
newtype | do | of | infixl | foreign |
class | deriving | where | infixr |
User:49.205.218.102 (talk | contribs) User:89.164.107.42 (talk | contribs) User:Alan U. Kennington (talk | history | contribs) User:Alanscottwalker (talk | history | contribs) User:Ancheta Wis (talk | history | contribs) User:Ancheta Wis/1st Space Brigade (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/Definition (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/Land tenure (case) (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/PaJaMo experiment (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/Shmuel Sambursky (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/common.css (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/common.js (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/sandbox (talk | history) User:Ancheta Wis/scratch page (talk | history) User:Bob123345435577998578645636546486757566587667 (talk | contribs) User:BrownHairedGirl (talk | history | contribs) User:CoolSkittle (talk | history | contribs) User:Crazynas (talk | history | contribs) User:DannyS712 (talk | history | contribs) User:Evelynbreit (talk | contribs) User:Finnusertop (talk | history | contribs) User:Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk | history | contribs) User:Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | history | contribs) User:GoldenRing (talk | history | contribs) User:Graeme Bartlett (talk | history | contribs) User:Hedonil (talk | history | contribs) User:Hodgdon's secret garden (talk | history | contribs) User:Inowen (talk | history | contribs) User:Johnuniq (talk | history | contribs) User:Legacypac (talk | history | contribs) User:Looie496 (talk | history | contribs) User:Manning Bartlett (talk | history | contribs) User:Moxy (talk | history | contribs) User:Primefac (talk | history | contribs) User:Prof. Carl Hewitt (talk | history | contribs) User:Quarkgluonsoup (talk | history | contribs) User:Ramadut (talk | contribs) User:Robert McClenon (talk | history | contribs) User:Simonmar (talk | history | contribs) User:TheDJ (talk | history | contribs) User:The Interior (talk | history | contribs) User:The Patriot Way (talk | history | contribs) User:The Transhumanist (talk | history | contribs) User:Truth19890604 (talk | contribs) User:UnitedStatesian (talk | history | contribs) User:Waggers (talk | history | contribs) User:X! (talk | history | contribs) User:Xamgore (talk | contribs) User:חופש (talk | contribs)
Lindberg 1976, theories of vision Alhazen's Synthesis .. Kepler .. Galileo thread documents a Lindberg statement vis a vis Kepler's familiarity with Alhazen
Author Charles_Sanders_Peirce Bowman L. Clarke (1977) Peirce's Neglected argument
Rate of language evolution is affected by population size
Greeno Moore Smith 1993 "Transfer of situated learning" Peel's principles
Christine Ladd-Franklin (1847-1930), as part of her Ph.D. dissertation in logic under C.S. Peirce, formulated a 16-row truth table [1] in form like that of Wittgenstein (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Proposition 5.101.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/4450956?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Hypothetico-Deductive&searchText=Reasoning&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3DHypothetico-Deductive%2BReasoning%26amp%3BSearch%3DSearch%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3BglobalSearch%3D%26amp%3BsbbBox%3D%26amp%3BsbjBox%3D%26amp%3BsbpBox%3D&seq=14#page_scan_tab_contents Anton E. LawsonThe Generality of Hypothetico-Deductive Reasoning: Making Scientific Thinking Explicit
https://www.nrdc.org/nuclear/nif/seab0110.pdf nif interim report 10 jan 2000
http://ciog6.army.mil/Portals/1/ANCP/Army%20CIO-G6%20Overview%20%2817%20Feb%2015%29.pdf Army CIO/G-6
http://www.dote.osd.mil/pub/reports/FY2014/pdf/bmds/2014gmd.pdf
http://ed-thelen.org/digest1.html#p15
http://www.army.mil/article/133461/94th__32nd__263rd_AAMDC_Mark_Milestone_Supporting_UFG__14/
http://www.army.mil/article/166098/End_of_year__use_it_or_lose_it__budget_mindset_to_get_tossed/ new mindset for budget
In a related question, there appears to be a division of function between the "
AMC" (materiel), "
TRADOC" (training and doctrine), and "
FORSCOM" (operations) aspects of the A
rmy; in the case of the
THAAD batteries, for example, on Fort Bliss, the Army developed the materiel, trained the Soldiers, and deployed the units; in an Army example,
32nd Army Air & Missile Defense Command takes the lead in specifying, training, and deploying the equipment and Soldiers. But if the deployed
THAAD batteries were to defend against a missile attack on the nation,
Ninth Air Force directs the missile defense.
So for cyber, it appears, again, that the Army takes the lead in specifying, hardening, and deploying the system/ network, but in an operational event (probably not a hot war), joint DoD-level command takes over. True? -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 20:49, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
DoD satellite swarms in play, Washington Post 10May2016
https://www.army.mil/article/169567/improving_army_readiness_for_the_21st_century Lt Gen Dail, formerly headed Defense Logistics Agency
http://www.wsmr.army.mil/Pages/newhome.aspx WSMR
https://www.army.mil/article/170918/two_years_of_hard_work_pays_off_for_soldiers_at_national_training_center 2 yrs for NG 1/34 ID to prepare a nationwide muster to NTC
https://www.army.mil/article/164377/Future_of_deployments__surge_ready_and_rotationally_focused/ readiness in FORSCOM
http://www.reuters.com/news/picture/us-completes-complex-test-of-layered-mis?articleId=USKCN0SQ2GR20151102&slideId=1091520709 THAAD U.S. completes complex test of layered missile defense system
https://www.army.mil/article/171316/us_to_deploy_thaad_missile_battery_to_south_korea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7ErnJU_ghE 2015 THAAD FTO2 Event2a
2016ArmyReservePostureStatement .pdf cb1
Army_2020_Charts .pdf cb1
https://www.army.mil/article/176036/army_operations_tempo_near_wartime_high
https://www.army.mil/article/175469/changing_nature_of_war_wont_change_our_purpose
http://gao.gov/assets/660/654289.pdf
http://fas.org/irp/doddir/army/fm3-07-1.pdf
Recently, Jin-Woo Han and Meyya Meyyappan (23 Jun 2014) Vacuum Transistor, NASA Ames Research Center, prototyped a 460 gigahertz, 10V device
chain reaction critical mass Critical mass (disambiguation) Salience kinetic corpuscularianism, the second transformation Chain of events Stability Solution (disambiguation)
To separate this thread from the previous, I document my findings from H. Floris Cohen (2010) How Modern Science Came Into The World: four civilizations, one 17th century breakthrough, which is a 'big-picture' survey, based on his (1994) The Scientific Revolution: a Historiographical Inquiry, upon which he builds, except for its last chapter, which was his 1994 view, and which is now replaced by his 2010 book.
0: H. Floris Cohen notes that history of science mixes the influences on 'science' into such a large pot, that its study has become inconclusive (Needham says 'bankrupt'). He argues that previous translations of primary sources, which translate a word as 'science', ought to translate it as 'nature-knowledge' instead. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 11:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Citation: H. Floris Cohen (2010) How modern science came into the world: four civilizations, one 17th century breakthrough ISBN 9789089642394 . H. Floris Cohen is a Dutchman and historiographer. He might serve as a secondary or tertiary source for the article. He also wrote (1994) The Scientific Revolution: A Historiographical Inquiry. The 1994 book started with 60 ideas which he reviewed for their influence on Scientific Revolutions. Its last chapter served as the basis for his 2010 book, which he began in 1994. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 20:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
@Vormeph, here is evidence directly contradicting your latest edit, which places English in the family of Negative Concord grammars:
William Labov (1972) "Negative Attraction and Negative Concord in English Grammar" Language 48(4) pp.773-818, has found that negative concord is a variable feature in English. In contrast, negative attraction to the word 'any' is invariant across all dialects of English. All attempts to remove 'not' from the phrase 'not any' are invariably rejected as nongrammatical.
The JSTOR citation: @article{1972
In summary, the various dialects of English occupy the spectrum of use of negative concord, from none at all, to obligatory. It appears that you ought to revert your edit. On the bright side, you just might find support for your position in other articles published by Linguistic Society of America. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 05:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
One of the advantages of this article is that it explicitly lists some
abuses of notation which in fact are being handled systematically by some of the
functional languages such as
Haskell. As humans, we subconsciously skip over the abuses, in poetic fashion, and get right to the
point, or semantics. In Haskell, some of these formulaic expressions are in fact recognized as partially grammatical thunks (thought-chunks), and are held in abeyance by the compiler for filling-in at some point in the lifetime of the expression. Although Haskell allows
Unicode, and could save away thunks such as
as humans, we parse this thunk as a "hungry operator" (to use Feynman's terminology) which doesn't bother us.
It may help to insert inline wp:tags, such as {{discuss}}, into the article to highlight just what needs to be explicitly expanded for the literal-minded readers among us.-- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 16:45, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
When following-up the page needed tag on the claim by Ben-Chaim 2004, I used JSTOR. The JSTOR review does not back up Ben-Chaim, but cites Westfall. I am inclined to drop Ben-Chaim in favor of Westfall (1980) Never at Rest. From my reading of Westfall, Westfall notes that when Newton was a child, he had a popular science book for children on how to do various mechanical projects, on a child's level, and he built the gadgets from the book: miniature mills, machines, carts, and other inventions. He certainly had a lot of time on the farm at Grantham, because he couldn't even watch his step-father's sheep, he was so preoccupied. His maternal uncle intervened to persuade his stepfather to send him to Trinity. By 1666, when Newton was 24, he was back at Grantham because of the plague scare. There, Newton formulated the inverse square law. Newton studied Opticks in his room at Trinity, etc. What Ben-Chaim attributes to Locke, etc. was 'in the air' of England. It was even obvious to the author of that children's book that Newton had. Newton had studied the same theorems we learned in Freshman Calculus from Isaac Barrow, who invented fluxions (differential calculus, independent of Leibniz). That's why Newton didn't claim Calculus as his own theory, even though Newton invented inverse fluxions (integrals), and wrote his book on fluxions so late. Westfall named Newton's biography Never at Rest because Newton's mind was never at rest.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2689412?loggedin=true&seq=10#page_scan_tab_contents 3 crises The Three Crises in Mathematics: Logicism, Intuitionism and Formalism
Location for discussion of the Lede Image. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 16:08, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
The Feynman Lectures on Physics Chapter 5, Volume I, last diagram, maps distances to objects, ranging from the radius of a nucleus to the edge of the universe The previous chapters cover 1: & 2:the nature of things (the atomic theory), time, space, physical phenomena. 3:The relation of physics to other sciences 4:Energy So to me, the disputed image covers all this, and Chapter 5, Volume I, last diagram covers all the objects of the image, versus a distance scale. -- Ancheta Wis (talk | contribs) 17:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
... macroscopic...is incorrectly in small scale. Widefox; talk 19:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Well that at least has hope of being something appropriate. I'd rather start from a blank slate and decide what the image should contain first, go from there to decide on what the elements of that image should be. The three main divisions we have in the article are a) natural sciences b) social sciences c) formal sciences. So going by that, we need three things
Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 01:33, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
References