Wikipedia should be treated as journalism. It should be an accurate, in tune, with matters, and avoid bias.
E.g., In subjects of ancient History:
E.g., My main sources as new sources:
www.quackwatch.org
Spell Check:
Oxford dictionary:
Visual thesaurus:
Questions: What? When? Where? Which? Who? Whom? Why? and How? are important but, it must be relevant! Relevance is of utmost importance, in this encyclopedic database, at least in my personal opinion and, take of mine own perspective and Wikipedia...
- http://www.museumsector.gov.eg/
- http://www.zahihawass.com/home.htm
Wikipedia should be treated as journalism. It should be an accurate, in tune, with matters, and avoid bias.
E.g., In subjects of ancient History:
E.g., My main sources as new sources:
www.quackwatch.org
Spell Check:
Oxford dictionary:
Visual thesaurus:
Questions: What? When? Where? Which? Who? Whom? Why? and How? are important but, it must be relevant! Relevance is of utmost importance, in this encyclopedic database, at least in my personal opinion and, take of mine own perspective and Wikipedia...
- http://www.museumsector.gov.eg/
- http://www.zahihawass.com/home.htm