This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
The Lead includes a concise introductory sentence that gives a brief description of the article's contents. It is not overly or under detailed.
The content of the article is relative to the topic in that it elaborates on the topic with detailed information. It can be seen that the content is up to date because the current situation of Birner is included in the Biography section.
Overall, this article is neutral in tone. There does not seem to be any bias or viewpoints that are over or under represented; the information is presented in a neutral manner that simply informs, not persuades.
The only section in this article that is supported with references is the Biography section; the Research section and Topic sentence do not have references. The sources function well and contain sufficient information so as to be reliable resources for the information that this article presents. Some of the sources are more current than others, but it isn't necessary for them to be very recent due to the nature of the article; information that biographies present do not change with time.
This article is clear, concise, and easy to read. It does not have any grammatical or spelling errors and is well-organized into five different sections.
N/A--there are no images in this article.
Conversations in the Talk Page are mainly questions that pertain to certain aspects of Birner's life. Questions about citations are also raised. This article is part of WikiProject Chicago and WikiProject Women Scientists. It does not have any ratings for WikiProject Chicago, but is rated Start Class on the quality scale for WikiProject Women Scientists.
Overall this article did not seem to have any errors in the information that it presented, which is one of its strengths. A way in which it could be improved is the addition of more information; the article is not very elaborate and should expand in more detail on Birner's history and findings.
with four tildes — ~~~~
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
The Lead includes a concise introductory sentence that gives a brief description of the article's contents. It is not overly or under detailed.
The content of the article is relative to the topic in that it elaborates on the topic with detailed information. It can be seen that the content is up to date because the current situation of Birner is included in the Biography section.
Overall, this article is neutral in tone. There does not seem to be any bias or viewpoints that are over or under represented; the information is presented in a neutral manner that simply informs, not persuades.
The only section in this article that is supported with references is the Biography section; the Research section and Topic sentence do not have references. The sources function well and contain sufficient information so as to be reliable resources for the information that this article presents. Some of the sources are more current than others, but it isn't necessary for them to be very recent due to the nature of the article; information that biographies present do not change with time.
This article is clear, concise, and easy to read. It does not have any grammatical or spelling errors and is well-organized into five different sections.
N/A--there are no images in this article.
Conversations in the Talk Page are mainly questions that pertain to certain aspects of Birner's life. Questions about citations are also raised. This article is part of WikiProject Chicago and WikiProject Women Scientists. It does not have any ratings for WikiProject Chicago, but is rated Start Class on the quality scale for WikiProject Women Scientists.
Overall this article did not seem to have any errors in the information that it presented, which is one of its strengths. A way in which it could be improved is the addition of more information; the article is not very elaborate and should expand in more detail on Birner's history and findings.
with four tildes — ~~~~