![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
After reviewing this article I can say that the content added is relevant to the topic and is up to date. It feels like the added changes fit perfectly with article. The content is also neutral and doesn't have any bias positions. I did not find any sources tied to the information added. The book was mentioned, but wasn't included in the references. As mentioned before, the content added is well-written and clear to read. I did not find any grammatical or spelling errors in the changes added. No visual aid was added to the article which can help with comprehension. In general, I feel like the content added improved the overall quality of the article and made it more complete. There is still some things that should be added and improved (like sources and visual aid), but it's a great start.
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional ResourcesCheck out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions. |
After reviewing this article I can say that the content added is relevant to the topic and is up to date. It feels like the added changes fit perfectly with article. The content is also neutral and doesn't have any bias positions. I did not find any sources tied to the information added. The book was mentioned, but wasn't included in the references. As mentioned before, the content added is well-written and clear to read. I did not find any grammatical or spelling errors in the changes added. No visual aid was added to the article which can help with comprehension. In general, I feel like the content added improved the overall quality of the article and made it more complete. There is still some things that should be added and improved (like sources and visual aid), but it's a great start.
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)