Lead:
It seems that you are working on an already existing article and not writing a lead.
Content:
The content you are adding is definitely relevant to the topic. The biography section adds to the page and is an important part of a wikipedia article.
Tone and Balance:
Overall it seems pretty balanced to me. There is one sentence that I think does not sound neutral:
"By the late 1990s, Lee Bul was known as one of the most radical and original, Korean artists."
This could maybe be rephrased as something like "... Lee Bul was considered by many to be one of the most..."
Sources and References:
There are a good amount of sources which seem reliable.
Organization:
The two sections you are adding are organized well within the article. They add to the overall organization of the article.
Images and Media:
None
Overall Impressions:
The draft adds to the article substantially by adding key information.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
(provide username)
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Lead:
It seems that you are working on an already existing article and not writing a lead.
Content:
The content you are adding is definitely relevant to the topic. The biography section adds to the page and is an important part of a wikipedia article.
Tone and Balance:
Overall it seems pretty balanced to me. There is one sentence that I think does not sound neutral:
"By the late 1990s, Lee Bul was known as one of the most radical and original, Korean artists."
This could maybe be rephrased as something like "... Lee Bul was considered by many to be one of the most..."
Sources and References:
There are a good amount of sources which seem reliable.
Organization:
The two sections you are adding are organized well within the article. They add to the overall organization of the article.
Images and Media:
None
Overall Impressions:
The draft adds to the article substantially by adding key information.
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
(provide username)
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)