Reason: Article subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:RS. Please edit this article so that it meets notability and reliable source requirements or it may be deleted.
Reason: Article subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:RS. Please edit this article so that it meets notability and reliable source requirements or it may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability
WP:N per
WP:GNG and
WP:MOVIE. Sole reference is trivial and lacks detailed in depth coverage required to establish notability.
Reason: No evidence of notability
WP:N. Sources are almost entirely primary, promotional or trivial thus failing
WP:RS and
WP:V. This looks like advertising
WP:SPAM.
Reason: No evidence of notability. No sources are cited. A quick Google search did not turn up any RS sources that rang the notability bell. Please edit the article to explain the notability of the subject with verifiable and reliable
WP:RS sources or it may be deleted.
Reason: Article makes no claim to encyclopedic notability for its subject
WP:N. Sources are affiliated and fail
WP:RS. Please add details backed by properly cited reliable sources that establish notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article lacks
WP:RS sources and fails
WP:V. Article also lacks sufficient content to even rate as a stub and may meet the standards for deletion under A-3.
Reason: Article fails to establish encyclopedic notability. See
WP:N. No sources are cited. See
WP:RS. Article thus fails verifiability. See
WP:V. A Google search turned up no RS references to the subject of the article.
Reason: No evidence of notability. See
WP:N and
WP:MOVIE. Sources are unreliable and or trivial in their coverage. See
WP:RS and
WP:V. A Google search failed to yield any significant RS source coverage.
Reason: Article subject lacks notability. See
WP:BIO. Sources generally fail
WP:RS and often mention the subject only in passing or not at all. A Google search failed to yield any significant RS sources. Article appears to be a
WP:PROMO piece by a
WP:SPA.
Reason: No real evidence for notability. See
WP:CORP. No sources are cited. See
WP:RS and
WP:V. A Google search failed to yield anything in the form of RS sources. Article appears to be a
WP:SPAM piece by a
WP:COI -
WP:SPA.
Reason: Subject appears to be a minor league football/soccer team. No evidence of encyclopedic notability is presented. (See
WP:N,
WP:GNG and
WP:NSPORT.) No sources are cited. (See
WP:RS.) Thus failing
WP:V. Please add material backed by properly cited reliable and verifiable sources that establish the subject's encyclopedic notability, or this article is likely to be deleted. (See also
WP:42)
Reason: Article is ineligible for BLP-Prod as it was created before the rule took effect. Nonetheless this article makes no claim to encyclopedic notability for its subject. See
WP:N and
WP:BIO. No sources are cited. See
WP:RS and
WP:V. Please add content backed by properly cited reliable and verifiable sources that establish the notability of the subject or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No claim of encyclopedic notability is presented. See
WP:N. No sources are cited. See
WP:RS and
WP:V. This article appears to rely heavily on original research which is not admissible on Wikipedia. See
WP:OR. A Google search failed to yield any RS sources on the first ten pages of hits. Please expand this article to include material backed by reliable and verifiable sources that establish its notability, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Article cites no sources and thus fails
WP:V. A Google search failed to yield any
RS sources. Please add reliable and verifiable sources that support this article's content or it may be deleted.
Reason: This BLP appears to be a
WP:PROMO. Sources hugely fail
WP:RS and the article thus fails
WP:V. There is no claim to encyclopedic notability. See
WP:BIO.
Reason: No evidence of Encyclopedic Notability. See
WP:N. No sources are cited. A Google search failed to yield any
WP:RS sources. Article thus fails
WP:V. Please expand this article with material supported by reliable and verifiable sources establishing the notability of its subject, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails [[WP:NF] and
WP:GNG. Sources fail
WP:RS. Article thus fails
WP:V. A Google search failed to yield any RS sources for the subject. Please expand this article with material backed by reliable and verifiable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP. Sources hugely fail
WP:RS. Article thus fails
WP:V. A Google yielded large numbers of promotional hits and quotes of stock prices but nothing that would ring the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by detailed in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NM. Sources are promotional and or affiliated and fail
WP:RS. Article this fails
WP:V. A Google search yielded nothing that would ring the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. See
WP:FOOTY. Sole source fails
WP:RS. Article thus fails both
WP:BLP and
WP:V. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish encyclopedic notability, or it may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. See
WP:N. Sole source fails
WP:RS. Article thus fails
WP:V. A Google search turned up almost nothing on this subject. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish encyclopedic notability, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Article appears to be a
WP:POMO piece by a
WP:SPA and
WP:COI. No evidence of encyclopedic notability
WP:CORP. No sources are cited. Article thus also fails
WP:V. A Google search turned up only passing references in
WP:RS sources.
Reason: No evidence of encyclopedic notability. No sources are cited. A Google failed to turn up anything that rings the Notability bell. Article fails
WP:GNG,
WP:GEOFEAT and
WP:V.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:CORP. Sources appear to be limited to financial websites quoting stock prices. A Google turned up a large number of similar hits and a few very brief articles reporting financial returns for the company or press releases, but nothing that rang the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted. See also
WP:RS and
WP:V.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:CORP. Sources appear to be limited to financial websites quoting stock prices and press releases. A Google turned up a large number of similar hits and a few very brief articles reporting financial returns for the company or press releases, but nothing that rang the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establishes the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted. See also
WP:RS and
WP:V.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:CORP. Sources appear to be limited to financial websites quoting stock prices. A Google turned up nothing that rang the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establishes the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted. See also
WP:RS and
WP:V.
Reason: Subject does not appear to pass
WP:PROF. A quick Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Sources fail
WP:RS being either affiliated or self published. Please expand this article with material establishing the encyclopedic notability of its subject, backed by reliable and verifiable sources, or it may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability per
WP:BK. A Google failed to yield anything that rang the notability bell. The cited sources both fail
WP:RS. Article may be a
WP:PROMO piece by a
WP:SPA.
Reason: Subject does not appear to meet
WP:BASIC and
WP:ENTERTAINER. A Google turned up significant RS references on the subject only in relation to a single incident resulting in the termination of the subject from her employment in 2013. This however does not seem to satisfy
WP:BLP owing to
WP:BIO1E.
Reason: No evidence of encyclopedic notability
WP:N. No sources are cited. Article fails
WP:NRV. Please add material to this article establishing the notability of its subject backed by
reliable and
verifiable sources, or it may be deleted.
Reason: List contains only one item. Sole source fails
WP:RS thus raising
WP:NRV issues. Additionally list title refers to a self proclaimed state which does not enjoy widespread recognition thus potentially raising
WP:NPOV concerns. Bottom-line; there is no list here, there are no RS sources and there may be political implications/motives in the title.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:ENTERTAINER. Only one source passes
WP:RS, which is insufficient to establish encyclopedic notability. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Sole source fails
WP:RS. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add content establishing notability backed by in depth coverage from multiple reliable and verifiable secondary sources, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of encyclopedic notability. Subject appears to fail
WP:NALBUM. Cited sources are trivial. A Google did not yield anything that rings the notability bell.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject appears to fail
BASIC and
CREATIVE. Sources fail
RS. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell. Article has a
promotional tone to it. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable secondary sources to establish notability, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:BASIC,
WP:AUTHOR and
WP:PROF. A Google was difficult due to the commonality of the subject's name but did not yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from
reliable and
verifiable sources establishing the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject appears to fail
WP:CORP. The sole source is insufficient to establish
encyclopedic notability. A Google turned up the usual promotional websites and hits, but nothing that really rings the notability bell. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from
reliable and
verifiable sources that establish the notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject fails
NALBUM.
TOOSOON also would appear to apply. Article has a
promotional tone to it. The only contributing editors are two
SPAs. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: Subject fails
POLITICIAN and
BASIC. Local politicians are generally not considered notable unless they have received extensive in depth coverage coverage from multiple
reliable sources. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: Subject fails
POLITICIAN and
BASIC. Local politicians are generally not considered notable unless they have received extensive in depth coverage coverage from multiple
reliable sources. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG, and
WP:NFILM. No sources are cited thus also failing
WP:V. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Article has been tagged for improvement since January 2014 without result. That's long enough.
Reason: Subject is a one time minor independent candidate for president of Ghana who received less than 1% of the popular vote and appears to fail
WP:BASIC and
WP:POLITICIAN. Article likely also fails
WP:STUB as I see little prospect for expansion into an encyclopedic article. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: Although a Google suggests it is possible (but unclear) that this may be a school affiliated with the Indian Air Force, there is no indication that it is high school or college. No sources are cited thus failing
WP:V. Google did not yield enough to clarify any of these points or ring the notability bell. Please expand this article with information backed by
reliable secondary and tertiary sources that establish
encyclopedic notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject fails
WP:PRODUCT. Sole source is self published and fails
WP:RS. Article has distinctly
promotional tone it. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from independent reliable secondary sources that establish notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:NALBUM. Sources fail
WP:RS and or are trivial in their coverage. Claimed charting for single is from dubious source and is insufficient to establish notability for the entire album. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple reliable secondary sources that establish
encyclopedic notability, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject appears to fail
WP:BASIC and
WP:CREATIVE Sources fail
WP:RS. A Google did not yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple reliable sources that establish the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:PRODUCT. Sole source is doubtful
WP:RS and in any case is insufficient to establish notability. A Google did not yield anything that rings the N Bell. Please add content backed by multiple reliable secondary sources that establish
encyclopedic notability, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP. Sources generally fail
WP:RS. A Google did not yield anything that rings the N bell. Please add material backed by multiple reliable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of the subject or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article is a
essay written by a college student for a course. Article fails
WP:NPOV. No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Sources generally fail
WP:RS. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple independent
reliable sources or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO. References are about the business, not the subject of the article. Article has a
promotional tone to it. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject is utterly non-notable. Worldcat shows a mere six holdings. See
WP:NBOOK. This should be a speedy delete but books are not covered by CSD A-7.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject fails
WP:NBAND. Sole source fails
WP:RS. Please add content backed by multiple independent
reliable sources that establishes the notability of the subject or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:WEBCRIT. Sources generally fail
WP:RS. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple independent
reliable sources establishing the [[WP:N|encyclopedic notability of the subject or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:EVENT. With very rare exceptions, local elections are not considered notable for encyclopedic purposes. No sources are cited so the article also fails
WP:V.
Reason: No sources despite being tagged for a year. An English language Google search did not yield any reliable source coverage. Article currently fails
WP:V and potentially
WP:N. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources or this article may be deleted. Perhaps sources exist in another language? In any event sources need to be added or it needs to go.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NMOVIE. Sources fails
WP:RS. Article has been tagged for improvement for six months w/o result. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing
encyclopedic notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NF. Sources fail
WP:RS. Article has been tagged for improvement for six months w/o result. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing
encyclopedic notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability per
WP:GNG and
WP:POL.A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources that establishes the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article cites no sources and fails
WP:V. Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article cites no sources and fails
WP:V. Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. Subject fails
WP:BASIC and
WP:BLP which requires at least one reliable source. Sole cited source is a dead link. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article has no sources thus failing
WP:V. Subject appears to fail
WP:BASIC,
WP:CREATIVE and
WP:MUSBIO. Claimed award appears to be well below the top level and is unsourced. The whole article reads like a resume. A Google yielded nothing that rings the N Bell. How did this article survive so long?
Reason: Article cites no sources thus failing
WP:V. The subject is difficult grasp as the article is almost incoherent, however there does not appear to be any discernible claim to notability. Please add content backed by multiple
reliable sources that establishes the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:GEOFEAT (Grade II listing does not confer notability). Article also cites no sources thus failing
WP:V. Additionally the article has a
promotional tone to it. A redirect appears to be impractical given the very large number of "Castle Inns" in existence, some of which also appear to be Grade II listed. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple independent and
reliable sources that establishes the notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. Subject fails
WP:BASIC and
WP:AUTHOR. Sources fail
WP:RS. A Google yielded nothing that rings the notability bell. Article is likely
promotional. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable and
verifiable sources that established the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability whatsoever. Subject fails
WP:PRODUCT and
WP:GNG. Sources fail
WP:RS. Google yielded nothing even remotely suggesting encyclopedic notability. The only reason this is not being tagged for Speedy Delete is because CSD A-7 does not apply to products.
Reason: Article is an autobiography. Subject fails
WP:BASIC and
WP:CREATIVE. Sole source appears to be a small strictly local weekly publication that fails
WP:RS. A Google did not yield anything that rings the N Bell. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable and
verifiable sources that establishes the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article is likely to be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. Subject appears to be a fringe micro-political party, primarily composed of foreign nationals. No sources are cited. Article fails
WP:V. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources that establish the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Not notable. Subject fails GNG. The ship was never built and is at most a footnote in maritime history. I was unable to find any sources that ring the notability bell.
Reason: Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG,
WP:PRODUCT and
WP:INDISCRIMINATE. While there are quite a few passing references that confirm its existence, I have somewhat surprisingly been unable to find anything that would constitute the kind of in-depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources that we require. Just because something exists does not mean it gets an article. I might be inclined to overlook the thin sourcing if the article actually contained any useful information. But at present it is a two sentence stub and what sources I have found offer almost nothing worth adding.
Reason: Subject fails WP:GNG. A Google yielded a plethora of hits all but one of which appear to be either promotional or commercial in nature. Please feel free to add citations to in depth coverage from independent reliable sources in order to establish
encyclopedic notability.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:ORG. A Google search yielded very little in the form of independent reliable source coverage. The only cited source is affiliated. Please add citations to in depth coverage from multiple
independent reliable sources or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject appears to fail guidelines for biographical articles, specifically
WP:BASIC and
WP:ATH. Although a Google search did yield some references to the subject, they did not meet the standard for in depth coverage by multiple independent
reliable sources. Found coverage appears to be far to brief and in some cases trivial to establish the
encyclopedic notability of the subject. That said I have added this to my watch list as it is entirely possible that Mr. Henderson may at some point rise to that level.
The article creator is encouraged to peruse the linked guidelines and if additional sources exist that may lend themselves to establishing encyclopedic notability, please add them.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:NCORP. A Google did not yield sufficient coverage from independent reliable secondary sources to ring the WP:N bell. If you intend to remove this notice please leave a note on the talk explaining your rational.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NCORP. A Google failed to yield sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources to ring the
WP:N bell. If you remove this tag w/o remedying the deficiencies outlined above please ping me with an explanation. Thanks... -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 03:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Reason: Subject does not pass
WP:ANYBIO. Listed references are trivial and or fail
WP:RS. A
WP:BEFORE failed to yield enough to ring the
WP:N bell. Interested editors are invited to expand this article if possible and add cited material that may establish the subject's encyclopedic notability. However, if removing the tag, please explain the basis for the subject's notability and on the talk page and ping me. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 21:43, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Reason: Subject fails
WP:1E. Their sole claim to any significance was being the last living survivor of the Hindenburg crash. I have been unable to find any other claim to significance. If this tag is removed please explain how the subject passes our notability guidelines including 1E on the talk page and ping me. Thank you... -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 22:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Reason: Article is completely unsourced. Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG,
WP:V and
WP:NORG. I have been unable to find any independent and reliable evidence confirming the subject even exists. Anyone removing this tag is kindly requested to provide independent reliable secondary sources establishing the existence of this organization and its
encyclopedic notability.
Reason: Article is substantially unsourced, thus failing
WP:V. (YouTube is not a
reliable source.) A search failed to turn up sufficient independent reliable source coverage to satisfy
WP:NCORP, and thus the subject does not appear to meet our guidelines for [[WP:N|inclusion in the encyclopedia]. Editors are encouraged to add sources, if possible, that would help to establish notability and verify claims of fact in the article. Any editor removing this tag is kindly asked to ping me and include an explanation for why they believe the article should be kept. Thank you...
Reason: Article is substantially unsourced, thus failing
WP:V. (YouTube is not a
reliable source.) A search failed to turn up sufficient independent reliable source coverage to satisfy
WP:NCORP, and thus the subject does not appear to meet our guidelines for [[WP:N|inclusion in the encyclopedia]. Editors are encouraged to add sources, if possible, that would help to establish notability and verify claims of fact in the article. Any editor removing this tag is kindly asked to ping me and include an explanation for why they believe the article should be kept. Thank you.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:ORGCRIT. A Google search failed to yield the level of coverage from reliable secondary sources sufficient to establish encyclopedic notability as required by the above linked policies and guidelines.
Reason: Article subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:RS. Please edit this article so that it meets notability and reliable source requirements or it may be deleted.
Reason: Article subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:RS. Please edit this article so that it meets notability and reliable source requirements or it may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability
WP:N per
WP:GNG and
WP:MOVIE. Sole reference is trivial and lacks detailed in depth coverage required to establish notability.
Reason: No evidence of notability
WP:N. Sources are almost entirely primary, promotional or trivial thus failing
WP:RS and
WP:V. This looks like advertising
WP:SPAM.
Reason: No evidence of notability. No sources are cited. A quick Google search did not turn up any RS sources that rang the notability bell. Please edit the article to explain the notability of the subject with verifiable and reliable
WP:RS sources or it may be deleted.
Reason: Article makes no claim to encyclopedic notability for its subject
WP:N. Sources are affiliated and fail
WP:RS. Please add details backed by properly cited reliable sources that establish notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article lacks
WP:RS sources and fails
WP:V. Article also lacks sufficient content to even rate as a stub and may meet the standards for deletion under A-3.
Reason: Article fails to establish encyclopedic notability. See
WP:N. No sources are cited. See
WP:RS. Article thus fails verifiability. See
WP:V. A Google search turned up no RS references to the subject of the article.
Reason: No evidence of notability. See
WP:N and
WP:MOVIE. Sources are unreliable and or trivial in their coverage. See
WP:RS and
WP:V. A Google search failed to yield any significant RS source coverage.
Reason: Article subject lacks notability. See
WP:BIO. Sources generally fail
WP:RS and often mention the subject only in passing or not at all. A Google search failed to yield any significant RS sources. Article appears to be a
WP:PROMO piece by a
WP:SPA.
Reason: No real evidence for notability. See
WP:CORP. No sources are cited. See
WP:RS and
WP:V. A Google search failed to yield anything in the form of RS sources. Article appears to be a
WP:SPAM piece by a
WP:COI -
WP:SPA.
Reason: Subject appears to be a minor league football/soccer team. No evidence of encyclopedic notability is presented. (See
WP:N,
WP:GNG and
WP:NSPORT.) No sources are cited. (See
WP:RS.) Thus failing
WP:V. Please add material backed by properly cited reliable and verifiable sources that establish the subject's encyclopedic notability, or this article is likely to be deleted. (See also
WP:42)
Reason: Article is ineligible for BLP-Prod as it was created before the rule took effect. Nonetheless this article makes no claim to encyclopedic notability for its subject. See
WP:N and
WP:BIO. No sources are cited. See
WP:RS and
WP:V. Please add content backed by properly cited reliable and verifiable sources that establish the notability of the subject or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No claim of encyclopedic notability is presented. See
WP:N. No sources are cited. See
WP:RS and
WP:V. This article appears to rely heavily on original research which is not admissible on Wikipedia. See
WP:OR. A Google search failed to yield any RS sources on the first ten pages of hits. Please expand this article to include material backed by reliable and verifiable sources that establish its notability, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Article cites no sources and thus fails
WP:V. A Google search failed to yield any
RS sources. Please add reliable and verifiable sources that support this article's content or it may be deleted.
Reason: This BLP appears to be a
WP:PROMO. Sources hugely fail
WP:RS and the article thus fails
WP:V. There is no claim to encyclopedic notability. See
WP:BIO.
Reason: No evidence of Encyclopedic Notability. See
WP:N. No sources are cited. A Google search failed to yield any
WP:RS sources. Article thus fails
WP:V. Please expand this article with material supported by reliable and verifiable sources establishing the notability of its subject, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails [[WP:NF] and
WP:GNG. Sources fail
WP:RS. Article thus fails
WP:V. A Google search failed to yield any RS sources for the subject. Please expand this article with material backed by reliable and verifiable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP. Sources hugely fail
WP:RS. Article thus fails
WP:V. A Google yielded large numbers of promotional hits and quotes of stock prices but nothing that would ring the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by detailed in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NM. Sources are promotional and or affiliated and fail
WP:RS. Article this fails
WP:V. A Google search yielded nothing that would ring the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. See
WP:FOOTY. Sole source fails
WP:RS. Article thus fails both
WP:BLP and
WP:V. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish encyclopedic notability, or it may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. See
WP:N. Sole source fails
WP:RS. Article thus fails
WP:V. A Google search turned up almost nothing on this subject. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish encyclopedic notability, or it may be deleted.
Reason: Article appears to be a
WP:POMO piece by a
WP:SPA and
WP:COI. No evidence of encyclopedic notability
WP:CORP. No sources are cited. Article thus also fails
WP:V. A Google search turned up only passing references in
WP:RS sources.
Reason: No evidence of encyclopedic notability. No sources are cited. A Google failed to turn up anything that rings the Notability bell. Article fails
WP:GNG,
WP:GEOFEAT and
WP:V.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:CORP. Sources appear to be limited to financial websites quoting stock prices. A Google turned up a large number of similar hits and a few very brief articles reporting financial returns for the company or press releases, but nothing that rang the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted. See also
WP:RS and
WP:V.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:CORP. Sources appear to be limited to financial websites quoting stock prices and press releases. A Google turned up a large number of similar hits and a few very brief articles reporting financial returns for the company or press releases, but nothing that rang the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establishes the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted. See also
WP:RS and
WP:V.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:CORP. Sources appear to be limited to financial websites quoting stock prices. A Google turned up nothing that rang the notability bell. Please expand this article with material backed by in depth coverage from reliable and verifiable sources that establishes the encyclopedic notability of its subject, or it may be deleted. See also
WP:RS and
WP:V.
Reason: Subject does not appear to pass
WP:PROF. A quick Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Sources fail
WP:RS being either affiliated or self published. Please expand this article with material establishing the encyclopedic notability of its subject, backed by reliable and verifiable sources, or it may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability per
WP:BK. A Google failed to yield anything that rang the notability bell. The cited sources both fail
WP:RS. Article may be a
WP:PROMO piece by a
WP:SPA.
Reason: Subject does not appear to meet
WP:BASIC and
WP:ENTERTAINER. A Google turned up significant RS references on the subject only in relation to a single incident resulting in the termination of the subject from her employment in 2013. This however does not seem to satisfy
WP:BLP owing to
WP:BIO1E.
Reason: No evidence of encyclopedic notability
WP:N. No sources are cited. Article fails
WP:NRV. Please add material to this article establishing the notability of its subject backed by
reliable and
verifiable sources, or it may be deleted.
Reason: List contains only one item. Sole source fails
WP:RS thus raising
WP:NRV issues. Additionally list title refers to a self proclaimed state which does not enjoy widespread recognition thus potentially raising
WP:NPOV concerns. Bottom-line; there is no list here, there are no RS sources and there may be political implications/motives in the title.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:ENTERTAINER. Only one source passes
WP:RS, which is insufficient to establish encyclopedic notability. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Sole source fails
WP:RS. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add content establishing notability backed by in depth coverage from multiple reliable and verifiable secondary sources, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of encyclopedic notability. Subject appears to fail
WP:NALBUM. Cited sources are trivial. A Google did not yield anything that rings the notability bell.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject appears to fail
BASIC and
CREATIVE. Sources fail
RS. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell. Article has a
promotional tone to it. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable secondary sources to establish notability, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:BASIC,
WP:AUTHOR and
WP:PROF. A Google was difficult due to the commonality of the subject's name but did not yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from
reliable and
verifiable sources establishing the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject appears to fail
WP:CORP. The sole source is insufficient to establish
encyclopedic notability. A Google turned up the usual promotional websites and hits, but nothing that really rings the notability bell. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from
reliable and
verifiable sources that establish the notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject fails
NALBUM.
TOOSOON also would appear to apply. Article has a
promotional tone to it. The only contributing editors are two
SPAs. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: Subject fails
POLITICIAN and
BASIC. Local politicians are generally not considered notable unless they have received extensive in depth coverage coverage from multiple
reliable sources. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: Subject fails
POLITICIAN and
BASIC. Local politicians are generally not considered notable unless they have received extensive in depth coverage coverage from multiple
reliable sources. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG, and
WP:NFILM. No sources are cited thus also failing
WP:V. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Article has been tagged for improvement since January 2014 without result. That's long enough.
Reason: Subject is a one time minor independent candidate for president of Ghana who received less than 1% of the popular vote and appears to fail
WP:BASIC and
WP:POLITICIAN. Article likely also fails
WP:STUB as I see little prospect for expansion into an encyclopedic article. A Google did not yield enough to ring the notability bell.
Reason: Although a Google suggests it is possible (but unclear) that this may be a school affiliated with the Indian Air Force, there is no indication that it is high school or college. No sources are cited thus failing
WP:V. Google did not yield enough to clarify any of these points or ring the notability bell. Please expand this article with information backed by
reliable secondary and tertiary sources that establish
encyclopedic notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject fails
WP:PRODUCT. Sole source is self published and fails
WP:RS. Article has distinctly
promotional tone it. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from independent reliable secondary sources that establish notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:NALBUM. Sources fail
WP:RS and or are trivial in their coverage. Claimed charting for single is from dubious source and is insufficient to establish notability for the entire album. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple reliable secondary sources that establish
encyclopedic notability, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject appears to fail
WP:BASIC and
WP:CREATIVE Sources fail
WP:RS. A Google did not yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple reliable sources that establish the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:PRODUCT. Sole source is doubtful
WP:RS and in any case is insufficient to establish notability. A Google did not yield anything that rings the N Bell. Please add content backed by multiple reliable secondary sources that establish
encyclopedic notability, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP. Sources generally fail
WP:RS. A Google did not yield anything that rings the N bell. Please add material backed by multiple reliable sources that establish the encyclopedic notability of the subject or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article is a
essay written by a college student for a course. Article fails
WP:NPOV. No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Sources generally fail
WP:RS. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple independent
reliable sources or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:BIO. References are about the business, not the subject of the article. Article has a
promotional tone to it. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject is utterly non-notable. Worldcat shows a mere six holdings. See
WP:NBOOK. This should be a speedy delete but books are not covered by CSD A-7.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject fails
WP:NBAND. Sole source fails
WP:RS. Please add content backed by multiple independent
reliable sources that establishes the notability of the subject or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:WEBCRIT. Sources generally fail
WP:RS. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple independent
reliable sources establishing the [[WP:N|encyclopedic notability of the subject or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:EVENT. With very rare exceptions, local elections are not considered notable for encyclopedic purposes. No sources are cited so the article also fails
WP:V.
Reason: No sources despite being tagged for a year. An English language Google search did not yield any reliable source coverage. Article currently fails
WP:V and potentially
WP:N. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources or this article may be deleted. Perhaps sources exist in another language? In any event sources need to be added or it needs to go.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NMOVIE. Sources fails
WP:RS. Article has been tagged for improvement for six months w/o result. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing
encyclopedic notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NF. Sources fail
WP:RS. Article has been tagged for improvement for six months w/o result. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing
encyclopedic notability or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability per
WP:GNG and
WP:POL.A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources that establishes the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article cites no sources and fails
WP:V. Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article cites no sources and fails
WP:V. Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG and
WP:CORP. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. Subject fails
WP:BASIC and
WP:BLP which requires at least one reliable source. Sole cited source is a dead link. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources establishing the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Article has no sources thus failing
WP:V. Subject appears to fail
WP:BASIC,
WP:CREATIVE and
WP:MUSBIO. Claimed award appears to be well below the top level and is unsourced. The whole article reads like a resume. A Google yielded nothing that rings the N Bell. How did this article survive so long?
Reason: Article cites no sources thus failing
WP:V. The subject is difficult grasp as the article is almost incoherent, however there does not appear to be any discernible claim to notability. Please add content backed by multiple
reliable sources that establishes the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of
encyclopedic notability. Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:GEOFEAT (Grade II listing does not confer notability). Article also cites no sources thus failing
WP:V. Additionally the article has a
promotional tone to it. A redirect appears to be impractical given the very large number of "Castle Inns" in existence, some of which also appear to be Grade II listed. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple independent and
reliable sources that establishes the notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. Subject fails
WP:BASIC and
WP:AUTHOR. Sources fail
WP:RS. A Google yielded nothing that rings the notability bell. Article is likely
promotional. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable and
verifiable sources that established the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability whatsoever. Subject fails
WP:PRODUCT and
WP:GNG. Sources fail
WP:RS. Google yielded nothing even remotely suggesting encyclopedic notability. The only reason this is not being tagged for Speedy Delete is because CSD A-7 does not apply to products.
Reason: Article is an autobiography. Subject fails
WP:BASIC and
WP:CREATIVE. Sole source appears to be a small strictly local weekly publication that fails
WP:RS. A Google did not yield anything that rings the N Bell. Please add content backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable and
verifiable sources that establishes the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article is likely to be deleted.
Reason: No evidence of notability. Subject appears to be a fringe micro-political party, primarily composed of foreign nationals. No sources are cited. Article fails
WP:V. Please add material backed by in depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources that establish the
encyclopedic notability of the subject, or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Not notable. Subject fails GNG. The ship was never built and is at most a footnote in maritime history. I was unable to find any sources that ring the notability bell.
Reason: Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG,
WP:PRODUCT and
WP:INDISCRIMINATE. While there are quite a few passing references that confirm its existence, I have somewhat surprisingly been unable to find anything that would constitute the kind of in-depth coverage from multiple
reliable sources that we require. Just because something exists does not mean it gets an article. I might be inclined to overlook the thin sourcing if the article actually contained any useful information. But at present it is a two sentence stub and what sources I have found offer almost nothing worth adding.
Reason: Subject fails WP:GNG. A Google yielded a plethora of hits all but one of which appear to be either promotional or commercial in nature. Please feel free to add citations to in depth coverage from independent reliable sources in order to establish
encyclopedic notability.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:ORG. A Google search yielded very little in the form of independent reliable source coverage. The only cited source is affiliated. Please add citations to in depth coverage from multiple
independent reliable sources or this article may be deleted.
Reason: Subject appears to fail guidelines for biographical articles, specifically
WP:BASIC and
WP:ATH. Although a Google search did yield some references to the subject, they did not meet the standard for in depth coverage by multiple independent
reliable sources. Found coverage appears to be far to brief and in some cases trivial to establish the
encyclopedic notability of the subject. That said I have added this to my watch list as it is entirely possible that Mr. Henderson may at some point rise to that level.
The article creator is encouraged to peruse the linked guidelines and if additional sources exist that may lend themselves to establishing encyclopedic notability, please add them.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:NCORP. A Google did not yield sufficient coverage from independent reliable secondary sources to ring the WP:N bell. If you intend to remove this notice please leave a note on the talk explaining your rational.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:NCORP. A Google failed to yield sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources to ring the
WP:N bell. If you remove this tag w/o remedying the deficiencies outlined above please ping me with an explanation. Thanks... -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 03:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Reason: Subject does not pass
WP:ANYBIO. Listed references are trivial and or fail
WP:RS. A
WP:BEFORE failed to yield enough to ring the
WP:N bell. Interested editors are invited to expand this article if possible and add cited material that may establish the subject's encyclopedic notability. However, if removing the tag, please explain the basis for the subject's notability and on the talk page and ping me. -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 21:43, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Reason: Subject fails
WP:1E. Their sole claim to any significance was being the last living survivor of the Hindenburg crash. I have been unable to find any other claim to significance. If this tag is removed please explain how the subject passes our notability guidelines including 1E on the talk page and ping me. Thank you... -
Ad Orientem (
talk) 22:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Reason: Article is completely unsourced. Subject appears to fail
WP:GNG,
WP:V and
WP:NORG. I have been unable to find any independent and reliable evidence confirming the subject even exists. Anyone removing this tag is kindly requested to provide independent reliable secondary sources establishing the existence of this organization and its
encyclopedic notability.
Reason: Article is substantially unsourced, thus failing
WP:V. (YouTube is not a
reliable source.) A search failed to turn up sufficient independent reliable source coverage to satisfy
WP:NCORP, and thus the subject does not appear to meet our guidelines for [[WP:N|inclusion in the encyclopedia]. Editors are encouraged to add sources, if possible, that would help to establish notability and verify claims of fact in the article. Any editor removing this tag is kindly asked to ping me and include an explanation for why they believe the article should be kept. Thank you...
Reason: Article is substantially unsourced, thus failing
WP:V. (YouTube is not a
reliable source.) A search failed to turn up sufficient independent reliable source coverage to satisfy
WP:NCORP, and thus the subject does not appear to meet our guidelines for [[WP:N|inclusion in the encyclopedia]. Editors are encouraged to add sources, if possible, that would help to establish notability and verify claims of fact in the article. Any editor removing this tag is kindly asked to ping me and include an explanation for why they believe the article should be kept. Thank you.
Reason: Subject fails
WP:GNG and
WP:ORGCRIT. A Google search failed to yield the level of coverage from reliable secondary sources sufficient to establish encyclopedic notability as required by the above linked policies and guidelines.