From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aaliyah Nicole

((Bold))

Article Evaluation

Women Reduced to Sexual Objects

Everything in this article is relevant to the title, to me the article was extremely clear concise.

There was a complete bias inside this article, but I think that is acceptable considering the topic and that this from a feminist's perspective. The author clearly is not pleased with what the porn industry is doing to how people view women, but then there are also sex positive feminist who voice their opinions and see nothing with the porn industry. The author uses recent findings and the citations are credible and easily accessible. Through the article some of the same citations are repeated. There aren't any fact that were unnecessarily cited. The sources that were used are also biased to much the biases behind the article. In class we didn't really dive deep into the topic, but opinions were voiced. In the article it covers every view of biases and goes over every aspect, the good and the bad. On the talk page there are some who believes that there were too many quotes and feel as though there are some factual inaccuracy, but on the other hand people would like to simply reorganize it or add more information to it. I see nothing wrong with the way the article is set up, it opens up both side of the argument and provides more than enough sources in order for someone to do their own research if they wanted to.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aaliyah Nicole

((Bold))

Article Evaluation

Women Reduced to Sexual Objects

Everything in this article is relevant to the title, to me the article was extremely clear concise.

There was a complete bias inside this article, but I think that is acceptable considering the topic and that this from a feminist's perspective. The author clearly is not pleased with what the porn industry is doing to how people view women, but then there are also sex positive feminist who voice their opinions and see nothing with the porn industry. The author uses recent findings and the citations are credible and easily accessible. Through the article some of the same citations are repeated. There aren't any fact that were unnecessarily cited. The sources that were used are also biased to much the biases behind the article. In class we didn't really dive deep into the topic, but opinions were voiced. In the article it covers every view of biases and goes over every aspect, the good and the bad. On the talk page there are some who believes that there were too many quotes and feel as though there are some factual inaccuracy, but on the other hand people would like to simply reorganize it or add more information to it. I see nothing wrong with the way the article is set up, it opens up both side of the argument and provides more than enough sources in order for someone to do their own research if they wanted to.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook