Reason: Not a notable topic at all. Cannot find any secondary sources, and even in the books, the concept is rarely used. The reference given only uses the term 7 times. It is just a technology name that King used, and he does not explain the technology other than saying it is "mysterious." Following book: 5 times, and no additional detail. This is all Original Research or plot regurgitation.
Reason: Does not seem to pass
WP:GNG. My
WP:BEFORE did not uncover any secondary sources. Unlikely for sources to become uncovered now that she's depowered. Not notable in-universe, either, with only 13 appearances.
Reason: Unsourced article that is a duplicate of
Asur people, which at least includes some references, and is more comprehensive. -
2pou (
talk) 17:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Reason: Non-notable character with no individual coverage to meet
WP:GNG and only 39 appearances according to Marvel wiki. Prefer redirecting as an
WP:ATD-R, but this faces
WP:X or Y problems.
Reason: See
Talk:Angel (American band)#PROD in prior RM. Band is not independently notable from Criss Angel, and fails all 12 of the criteria in
WP:NBAND. I typically prefer a merge
WP:ATD-M alternative to deletion, but all of the content in the current article isn't even verifiable with the one source provided. Even if merged, the leftover redirect would have
WP:X or Y problems and should go to a dab page.
Reason: This appears to be the only nominations page linking back to the main page per
Special:WhatLinksHere/ENnie_Awards, and only listing noms is not notable on its own. There is already a winners page at
2008 ENnie Award winners. Seems weird to redirect to the winners page, as the nominations are not listed there (but could be found on the external link), and adding them would be inconsistent with the few other winners pages (
2007,
2009, and
2010).
Reason: Not notable per
WP:NTV. The only coverage is from when it was announced. I can't even find anything showing that the show ever actually ran on the air.
Reason:
WP:NOTDICT, unreferenced, and not entirely true as deployment can also refer to sending development prototypes out to the field for effective use.
Reason: Article has a
WP:PROMO tone, but more importantly, it doesn't seem to meet
WP:NFF. I cannot find any reviews of the film (
0 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes), and searching independently only revealed a genre fan site review that doesn't provide a a staff page or masthead to indicate that they are
WP:RS as opposed to
WP:SELFPUBLISHED.
Reason: I could not find any coverage of this one-off tournament in my
WP:BEFORE. Presumably, this page was created in anticipation of it becoming an ongoing event, but it eventually had the specific year added since it had no other iterations. I found some details of other Four Nations tournaments that were not rugby... I did see some passing mentions of a quote recalling the event took place, but not
WP:Significant coverage of the event itself.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a log of all
proposed deletion tags applied or endorsed by this user using
Twinkle's PROD module.
If you no longer wish to keep this log, you can turn it off using the
preferences panel, and nominate this page for speedy deletion under
CSD U1.
Reason: Not a notable topic at all. Cannot find any secondary sources, and even in the books, the concept is rarely used. The reference given only uses the term 7 times. It is just a technology name that King used, and he does not explain the technology other than saying it is "mysterious." Following book: 5 times, and no additional detail. This is all Original Research or plot regurgitation.
Reason: Does not seem to pass
WP:GNG. My
WP:BEFORE did not uncover any secondary sources. Unlikely for sources to become uncovered now that she's depowered. Not notable in-universe, either, with only 13 appearances.
Reason: Unsourced article that is a duplicate of
Asur people, which at least includes some references, and is more comprehensive. -
2pou (
talk) 17:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Reason: Non-notable character with no individual coverage to meet
WP:GNG and only 39 appearances according to Marvel wiki. Prefer redirecting as an
WP:ATD-R, but this faces
WP:X or Y problems.
Reason: See
Talk:Angel (American band)#PROD in prior RM. Band is not independently notable from Criss Angel, and fails all 12 of the criteria in
WP:NBAND. I typically prefer a merge
WP:ATD-M alternative to deletion, but all of the content in the current article isn't even verifiable with the one source provided. Even if merged, the leftover redirect would have
WP:X or Y problems and should go to a dab page.
Reason: This appears to be the only nominations page linking back to the main page per
Special:WhatLinksHere/ENnie_Awards, and only listing noms is not notable on its own. There is already a winners page at
2008 ENnie Award winners. Seems weird to redirect to the winners page, as the nominations are not listed there (but could be found on the external link), and adding them would be inconsistent with the few other winners pages (
2007,
2009, and
2010).
Reason: Not notable per
WP:NTV. The only coverage is from when it was announced. I can't even find anything showing that the show ever actually ran on the air.
Reason:
WP:NOTDICT, unreferenced, and not entirely true as deployment can also refer to sending development prototypes out to the field for effective use.
Reason: Article has a
WP:PROMO tone, but more importantly, it doesn't seem to meet
WP:NFF. I cannot find any reviews of the film (
0 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes), and searching independently only revealed a genre fan site review that doesn't provide a a staff page or masthead to indicate that they are
WP:RS as opposed to
WP:SELFPUBLISHED.
Reason: I could not find any coverage of this one-off tournament in my
WP:BEFORE. Presumably, this page was created in anticipation of it becoming an ongoing event, but it eventually had the specific year added since it had no other iterations. I found some details of other Four Nations tournaments that were not rugby... I did see some passing mentions of a quote recalling the event took place, but not
WP:Significant coverage of the event itself.