International relations Template‑class | |||||||
|
Globalization NA‑class | |||||||
|
There're no cristicism articles listed on this template. -- 200.226.100.139 ( talk) 06:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Should there not be a link to "Global Governance" in this template? 217.41.240.15 ( talk) 14:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
I am pretty sure you got the time to create a glossary for that. (Here: Special:PrefixIndex/Global -- 75.154.186.99 ( talk) 03:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I would like to start a discussion on the appropriateness of this template. As it stands now it makes no distinction between regional and international organisations, the concept of global governance, and conspiracy theories. It lumps together institutions such as the UN and the EU, fringe proposals such as the North American Union and the World Passport and articles of questionable relevance such as Proposals for new Australian states and Globalization (is an economic process really related to global and regional governance?) and all under the misleading title of "world government". Can we please find a more concise scope for this template and restrict it to that? It's a bit of a mess at the moment. -- Onen hag oll ( talk) 21:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
International relations Template‑class | |||||||
|
Globalization NA‑class | |||||||
|
There're no cristicism articles listed on this template. -- 200.226.100.139 ( talk) 06:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Should there not be a link to "Global Governance" in this template? 217.41.240.15 ( talk) 14:00, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
I am pretty sure you got the time to create a glossary for that. (Here: Special:PrefixIndex/Global -- 75.154.186.99 ( talk) 03:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I would like to start a discussion on the appropriateness of this template. As it stands now it makes no distinction between regional and international organisations, the concept of global governance, and conspiracy theories. It lumps together institutions such as the UN and the EU, fringe proposals such as the North American Union and the World Passport and articles of questionable relevance such as Proposals for new Australian states and Globalization (is an economic process really related to global and regional governance?) and all under the misleading title of "world government". Can we please find a more concise scope for this template and restrict it to that? It's a bit of a mess at the moment. -- Onen hag oll ( talk) 21:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC)