Argh! I saved it prematurely! I'm still working on this, thanx 68.39.174.238 03:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
OK, does this thing actually do any good? Unfortunately I can quite imagine that a few trolls would be delighted to get one of these slapped onto their user accounts. Maybe something less low key would be more appropriate? chowells 00:53, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
For a discussion about the edit link see the Template:Tnavbar( talk links history) talk page. For issues like align=right (floating), colour scheme, width, and line breaks see the ( talk links history) talk page, it's more or less the same problem for various "sidebar" templates. -- Omniplex 06:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
There's no need to repeatedly remove the Counter-Vandalism Unit from this template. Listing of the CVU on this template does not confer "official recognition" or assert that the pages listed are "official process[es]", any more than the listing of Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism gives it such a status. Rather, the listing is merely intended as a convenience to allow users to locate Wikipedia's only active anti-vandalism wikiproject. John254 04:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Snowspinner, you just complain, complain, complain. Since the formation you complained against CVU. You speedy deleted CVU logos... You campaigned against CVU all this time... You used every opportunity to remove it from existence. Get a new hobby, really. -- Cat out 20:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Where this link goes??? wikipedia having any commercial promise with this website(the links given) -- Jigesh ( talk) 10:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move per request.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 12:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Template:WikipediaVandalism → Template:Wikipedia vandalism — Per our long-standing, common convention to use proper casing and spacing in template names. -- The Evil IP address ( talk) 17:49, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
So, with the merger of Vandalism studies and the CVU, I'd like to see if consensus has changed in regards to listing the CVU on this template. I've taken a strong interest in seeing the CVU become something that it wasn't, back when those MFDs were lobbied and it was removed from this template. Right now it looks like we're going to reorganize into 4 branches. The Think Tank (which will turn into a 'Village Pump' kind of place, to coordinate counter-vandalism), The Academy (to train new counter-vandals), Vandalism studies (to continue the work they've been doing), and the Task Force (though I'm not 100% sure what they do). Given our new focus on collaboration, education, and coordination, would it make sense to put a link to the CVU in the "Resources & assistance" section? Achowat ( talk) 20:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
Argh! I saved it prematurely! I'm still working on this, thanx 68.39.174.238 03:53, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
OK, does this thing actually do any good? Unfortunately I can quite imagine that a few trolls would be delighted to get one of these slapped onto their user accounts. Maybe something less low key would be more appropriate? chowells 00:53, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
For a discussion about the edit link see the Template:Tnavbar( talk links history) talk page. For issues like align=right (floating), colour scheme, width, and line breaks see the ( talk links history) talk page, it's more or less the same problem for various "sidebar" templates. -- Omniplex 06:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
There's no need to repeatedly remove the Counter-Vandalism Unit from this template. Listing of the CVU on this template does not confer "official recognition" or assert that the pages listed are "official process[es]", any more than the listing of Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism gives it such a status. Rather, the listing is merely intended as a convenience to allow users to locate Wikipedia's only active anti-vandalism wikiproject. John254 04:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Snowspinner, you just complain, complain, complain. Since the formation you complained against CVU. You speedy deleted CVU logos... You campaigned against CVU all this time... You used every opportunity to remove it from existence. Get a new hobby, really. -- Cat out 20:27, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Where this link goes??? wikipedia having any commercial promise with this website(the links given) -- Jigesh ( talk) 10:13, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was move per request.-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 12:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Template:WikipediaVandalism → Template:Wikipedia vandalism — Per our long-standing, common convention to use proper casing and spacing in template names. -- The Evil IP address ( talk) 17:49, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
So, with the merger of Vandalism studies and the CVU, I'd like to see if consensus has changed in regards to listing the CVU on this template. I've taken a strong interest in seeing the CVU become something that it wasn't, back when those MFDs were lobbied and it was removed from this template. Right now it looks like we're going to reorganize into 4 branches. The Think Tank (which will turn into a 'Village Pump' kind of place, to coordinate counter-vandalism), The Academy (to train new counter-vandals), Vandalism studies (to continue the work they've been doing), and the Task Force (though I'm not 100% sure what they do). Given our new focus on collaboration, education, and coordination, would it make sense to put a link to the CVU in the "Resources & assistance" section? Achowat ( talk) 20:10, 16 April 2012 (UTC)