This template was considered for deletion on 2018 April 12. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
Greetings Chicbyaccident – Wondering reasons why this template was moved? Under View history I did not see any communications from additional contributors. Did this conclusion happen at WP Catholicism or WP Christianity & I just missed it? Regards, — JoeHebda • ( talk) 16:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
@ Jujutsuan: and more: we could use your help here. The idea was to merge this template with Template:Holy See. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 20:45, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
An odd coding that I can't figure out. I wanted to change 'Geography' to 'Sites' (the geography article is mostly unrelated to the section's entries) but the coding only includes the lower-case name 'geography' with no link. The other section heads have the same coding and unusual style (lower-case unlinked names). Does anyone know how this works, and why the section heads actually link to their pages? Maybe it's so easy I'm missing it, will look again (nope, can't figure it out). Thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 14:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Randy Kryn: Recently, I added the outline icon next to the link, and you reverted it, saying that icon shouldn't be used at the top of a nav box. In that case, are you okay with moving the outline link to the bottom? -- DannyS712 ( talk) 22:19, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
@ Randy Kryn: I'm sorry I completely forgot about this. I'm stopping, but (when I have time) I plan to open an RFC on:
-- DannyS712 ( talk) 23:40, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
@ Randy Kryn: I have started planning for an RfC at User:DannyS712/RfC. To ensure that the question is presented in an unbiased manner, please add any templates you think would make the table there better representative of the navboxes in general. -- DannyS712 ( talk) 20:44, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
...could perhaps be harmonised with those of Template:Vatican City topics? PPEMES ( talk) 23:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
This template was considered for deletion on 2018 April 12. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Greetings Chicbyaccident – Wondering reasons why this template was moved? Under View history I did not see any communications from additional contributors. Did this conclusion happen at WP Catholicism or WP Christianity & I just missed it? Regards, — JoeHebda • ( talk) 16:01, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
@ Jujutsuan: and more: we could use your help here. The idea was to merge this template with Template:Holy See. Chicbyaccident ( talk) 20:45, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
An odd coding that I can't figure out. I wanted to change 'Geography' to 'Sites' (the geography article is mostly unrelated to the section's entries) but the coding only includes the lower-case name 'geography' with no link. The other section heads have the same coding and unusual style (lower-case unlinked names). Does anyone know how this works, and why the section heads actually link to their pages? Maybe it's so easy I'm missing it, will look again (nope, can't figure it out). Thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 14:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
@ Randy Kryn: Recently, I added the outline icon next to the link, and you reverted it, saying that icon shouldn't be used at the top of a nav box. In that case, are you okay with moving the outline link to the bottom? -- DannyS712 ( talk) 22:19, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
@ Randy Kryn: I'm sorry I completely forgot about this. I'm stopping, but (when I have time) I plan to open an RFC on:
-- DannyS712 ( talk) 23:40, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
@ Randy Kryn: I have started planning for an RfC at User:DannyS712/RfC. To ensure that the question is presented in an unbiased manner, please add any templates you think would make the table there better representative of the navboxes in general. -- DannyS712 ( talk) 20:44, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
...could perhaps be harmonised with those of Template:Vatican City topics? PPEMES ( talk) 23:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)