This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is "Revisioning Earthsea"? Is this an essay? I don't think it's a full-length work, or if it is, I'll be very surprised to have missed something so significant. If an essay, it really should be in quotes, not italics. [...]
[...] And maybe it's worthwhile to have a list of significant essays by Le Guin, and that could link to it? There are other significant essays and speeches she's given that have been frequently reprinted; I'm thinking for instance of her commencement address to Mills College in, I think, the 80s; and there have been quite a few others widely reprinted. -- Lquilter ( talk) 14:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
While the bibliography will list all her works,
the template should be only for articles about her works, or works for whom articles are considered essential but not done yet. I question including all the short stories that are part of the hainish cycle in the template, unless each one deserves its own article. I may redlink them. Some links may be to the bibliography: again, templates like this are for navigation, not completeness. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone know whether we follow or break a guideline by bolding the titles of Other fiction novels? We must break one by doing it only for the Other, not Earthsea or Hainish.
Is the Catwings book or series uniquely childish among her published writings, and omitted from the template for that reason? Or the only childish work with an article? The template should link to all of her works that have articles. (We now have three stubs, iicc, which our coverage does not warrant, but some coverage is a permanent condition.)
The template should not be strictly limited to works and their group headings, even if its display title is "Works by UKL (bibliography)". I see how to begin improvement and will do so. -- P64 ( talk) 15:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I've been trying to get this template into some form of order, and I'd appreciate input, if anybody is still watching this. Essentially, I'm uncertain about which collections should be a part of this, and which short stories need to be mentioned individually. Any thoughts would be welcome. Vanamonde ( talk) 14:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What is "Revisioning Earthsea"? Is this an essay? I don't think it's a full-length work, or if it is, I'll be very surprised to have missed something so significant. If an essay, it really should be in quotes, not italics. [...]
[...] And maybe it's worthwhile to have a list of significant essays by Le Guin, and that could link to it? There are other significant essays and speeches she's given that have been frequently reprinted; I'm thinking for instance of her commencement address to Mills College in, I think, the 80s; and there have been quite a few others widely reprinted. -- Lquilter ( talk) 14:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
While the bibliography will list all her works,
the template should be only for articles about her works, or works for whom articles are considered essential but not done yet. I question including all the short stories that are part of the hainish cycle in the template, unless each one deserves its own article. I may redlink them. Some links may be to the bibliography: again, templates like this are for navigation, not completeness. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 05:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Does anyone know whether we follow or break a guideline by bolding the titles of Other fiction novels? We must break one by doing it only for the Other, not Earthsea or Hainish.
Is the Catwings book or series uniquely childish among her published writings, and omitted from the template for that reason? Or the only childish work with an article? The template should link to all of her works that have articles. (We now have three stubs, iicc, which our coverage does not warrant, but some coverage is a permanent condition.)
The template should not be strictly limited to works and their group headings, even if its display title is "Works by UKL (bibliography)". I see how to begin improvement and will do so. -- P64 ( talk) 15:45, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Okay, I've been trying to get this template into some form of order, and I'd appreciate input, if anybody is still watching this. Essentially, I'm uncertain about which collections should be a part of this, and which short stories need to be mentioned individually. Any thoughts would be welcome. Vanamonde ( talk) 14:53, 10 January 2017 (UTC)