This template is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
higher education,
universities, and
colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the
discussion, and see the project's
article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
education and
education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This template is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Subgroup colouring
I see no reason why the subgroups should not have the same colouring as the groups.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)reply
now fixed for the third time.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)reply
now fixed for the fourth time.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)reply
This is how it was originally formatted, and it was made this way for uniformity. I believe you've made the edit based on your personal taste and continued to edit war me on this. I see it as counter-productive to the page.
Ayoopdog (
talk) 20:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
higher education,
universities, and
colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the
discussion, and see the project's
article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
education and
education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This template is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Subgroup colouring
I see no reason why the subgroups should not have the same colouring as the groups.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)reply
now fixed for the third time.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)reply
now fixed for the fourth time.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:42, 22 March 2014 (UTC)reply
This is how it was originally formatted, and it was made this way for uniformity. I believe you've made the edit based on your personal taste and continued to edit war me on this. I see it as counter-productive to the page.
Ayoopdog (
talk) 20:24, 22 March 2014 (UTC)reply
