This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
United States presidential elections template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I reverted to the standard format used for all 200+ templates. As they all appear on the List of election results by country article, it looks very bad to have differing formats. Number 5 7 10:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
class="navbox"
etc.) or by using templates like {{
Navbox generic}}, {{
Navigation}} and the like. Using class="toccolours"
with arbritary widths, colors and text sizes is, in my opinion, a step in the wrong direction. –
Fred Bradstadt 16:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I suggest separating the list by centuries. It's just to make it look clearer so readers can find the date quicker. In short, it's for clarity, but nothing else. I don't think other election templates do this. Is consistency with them necessary? (And if so, should we consider changing them all?)
As follows:
What do you think? — Markles 12:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
United States presidential elections template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
I reverted to the standard format used for all 200+ templates. As they all appear on the List of election results by country article, it looks very bad to have differing formats. Number 5 7 10:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
class="navbox"
etc.) or by using templates like {{
Navbox generic}}, {{
Navigation}} and the like. Using class="toccolours"
with arbritary widths, colors and text sizes is, in my opinion, a step in the wrong direction. –
Fred Bradstadt 16:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I suggest separating the list by centuries. It's just to make it look clearer so readers can find the date quicker. In short, it's for clarity, but nothing else. I don't think other election templates do this. Is consistency with them necessary? (And if so, should we consider changing them all?)
As follows:
What do you think? — Markles 12:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)