Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States Template‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've done some edits for this template to improve it, but when you click on one of the article in the template, the template does not display the most recent modifications. I had to go through each article included in the template and repaste the template name to make it show up correctly, unfortunately I realized a few things needed changes after the fact and once again these don't show up on the template attached to an article page. Anyone know how to fix this? I've never seen this issue with other templates. Stormchaser89 ( talk) 10:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
This template is a mess.
Some obvious problems:
I'd like to suggest we consolidate the fission only and boosted section into one as distinguishing between them is very difficult, add a neutron weapon section, and retain the thermonuclear section. I'd remove primary stages that were not deployed alone as weapons and add them to a new section called something like "nuclear components". Kylesenior ( talk) 15:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Since I raised the issues above more than three years ago, the problem has apparently only gotten worse. As no one was apparently interested in discussing it, I took it upon myself to rework the template.
The issues:
Is there any way to differentiate between current and former weapons without turning this into a mess? Or are there only a handful of types still in active service? -- The Vital One ( talk) 16:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States Template‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've done some edits for this template to improve it, but when you click on one of the article in the template, the template does not display the most recent modifications. I had to go through each article included in the template and repaste the template name to make it show up correctly, unfortunately I realized a few things needed changes after the fact and once again these don't show up on the template attached to an article page. Anyone know how to fix this? I've never seen this issue with other templates. Stormchaser89 ( talk) 10:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
This template is a mess.
Some obvious problems:
I'd like to suggest we consolidate the fission only and boosted section into one as distinguishing between them is very difficult, add a neutron weapon section, and retain the thermonuclear section. I'd remove primary stages that were not deployed alone as weapons and add them to a new section called something like "nuclear components". Kylesenior ( talk) 15:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
Since I raised the issues above more than three years ago, the problem has apparently only gotten worse. As no one was apparently interested in discussing it, I took it upon myself to rework the template.
The issues:
Is there any way to differentiate between current and former weapons without turning this into a mess? Or are there only a handful of types still in active service? -- The Vital One ( talk) 16:56, 10 September 2021 (UTC)