This template is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a
WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with
limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Adding suspended and former members
How I should add Suspended members and Former members?--
Kaiyr (
talk) 12:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)reply
I would say don't. The template is already quite large, and the larger a template gets the more it distracts/detracts from the article and therefore the less useful it is. If somebody were to create a "Former members" template that might be useful: it would add to the relevant articles without uglifying the articles on which it is not relevant.
Scolaire (
talk) 07:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Scolaire is right in principle, although there are always exceptions. If you'd like to see some monster navboxes, and how they were split up, take a look at
Template:Murinae and
Template:The Beatles and their talk pages and edit histories. Even pages as large as these may still be transcluded, but only on one or two pages at most – (they are really serving as a another form of list page, not as real navboxes, so they can be linked to - but not transcluded - as often as you like.) --
NSH002 (
talk) 22:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Southern Azerbaijan
@
LouisAragon: Let me suggest a compromise here: let's link to
Southern Azerbaijan from this template, but let's not transclude this template at that article.
Going through this list recently, I'm fully aware that using this template on some pages is widely undue. But the reverse is not true: linking to certain pages from this template is entirely accurate and fine. In other words, on the level of the article
Southern Azerbaijan what you said, "a tiny separatist group doesn't represent all people of a region", is true. But on the level of UNPO that is exactly what the case is: a tiny group does represent the entire people of the region. Currently, by the way, that group is
South Azerbaijan Democratic Party and no longer
Southern Azerbaijan National Awakening Movement. But long story short, let's keep the link here but remove the navbox from the article, shall we? –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs) 12:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Finnusertop: Thank you for your message. Your proposal sounds good. Best, -
LouisAragon (
talk) 12:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Limited recognition, a
WikiProject dedicated to improving the coverage of entities with
limited recognition on Wikipedia by contributing to articles relating to unrecognized states and separatist movements. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join our WikiProject by signing your name at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.Limited recognitionWikipedia:WikiProject Limited recognitionTemplate:WikiProject Limited recognitionLimited recognition articles
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
Adding suspended and former members
How I should add Suspended members and Former members?--
Kaiyr (
talk) 12:51, 1 October 2014 (UTC)reply
I would say don't. The template is already quite large, and the larger a template gets the more it distracts/detracts from the article and therefore the less useful it is. If somebody were to create a "Former members" template that might be useful: it would add to the relevant articles without uglifying the articles on which it is not relevant.
Scolaire (
talk) 07:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Scolaire is right in principle, although there are always exceptions. If you'd like to see some monster navboxes, and how they were split up, take a look at
Template:Murinae and
Template:The Beatles and their talk pages and edit histories. Even pages as large as these may still be transcluded, but only on one or two pages at most – (they are really serving as a another form of list page, not as real navboxes, so they can be linked to - but not transcluded - as often as you like.) --
NSH002 (
talk) 22:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Southern Azerbaijan
@
LouisAragon: Let me suggest a compromise here: let's link to
Southern Azerbaijan from this template, but let's not transclude this template at that article.
Going through this list recently, I'm fully aware that using this template on some pages is widely undue. But the reverse is not true: linking to certain pages from this template is entirely accurate and fine. In other words, on the level of the article
Southern Azerbaijan what you said, "a tiny separatist group doesn't represent all people of a region", is true. But on the level of UNPO that is exactly what the case is: a tiny group does represent the entire people of the region. Currently, by the way, that group is
South Azerbaijan Democratic Party and no longer
Southern Azerbaijan National Awakening Movement. But long story short, let's keep the link here but remove the navbox from the article, shall we? –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs) 12:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC)reply
@
Finnusertop: Thank you for your message. Your proposal sounds good. Best, -
LouisAragon (
talk) 12:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)reply