Aviation: Aircraft / Rotorcraft Template‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rocketry Template‑class | |||||||
|
Spaceflight Template‑class | |||||||
|
Can anyone think of a better way to lay this out? - Joseph 20:40, 2004 Sep 8 (UTC)
Takeoff
Assisted take-off Balanced field takeoff JATO Non-rocket spacelaunch Rejected takeoff Rocket launch Zero-length launch
Takeoff + landing
CATOBAR CTOL STOBAR STOL STOVL V/STOL VTHL/VTOHL VTOL Launch and recovery cycle VTVL VTHL HTHL HTVL
Landing
Belly landing Crosswind landing Deadstick landing Emergency landing Forced landing Hard landing SRVL Short-field landing Splashdown Touch-and-go landing Water landing / Ditching Floating landing platform
Types of... |
|
... |
STOBAR |
|
JATO/ RATO |
ZLL/ ZLTO |
Since RATO redirects to JATO, maybe the template should be changed, and RATO and JATO put in a single line as " JATO/ RATO", like it's done for ZLL/ ZLTO? conio.h • talk 02:58, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Should SRVL (Ship-borne Rolling Vertical Landing) be added? Described here: [1]
I was surprised not to find a link for standard horizontal takeoff and horizontal landing in the template? Am I overlooking something? Or is the template really just types of non-standard take-off and landing? Cheers. N2e ( talk) 15:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Aviation: Aircraft / Rotorcraft Template‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rocketry Template‑class | |||||||
|
Spaceflight Template‑class | |||||||
|
Can anyone think of a better way to lay this out? - Joseph 20:40, 2004 Sep 8 (UTC)
Takeoff
Assisted take-off Balanced field takeoff JATO Non-rocket spacelaunch Rejected takeoff Rocket launch Zero-length launch
Takeoff + landing
CATOBAR CTOL STOBAR STOL STOVL V/STOL VTHL/VTOHL VTOL Launch and recovery cycle VTVL VTHL HTHL HTVL
Landing
Belly landing Crosswind landing Deadstick landing Emergency landing Forced landing Hard landing SRVL Short-field landing Splashdown Touch-and-go landing Water landing / Ditching Floating landing platform
Types of... |
|
... |
STOBAR |
|
JATO/ RATO |
ZLL/ ZLTO |
Since RATO redirects to JATO, maybe the template should be changed, and RATO and JATO put in a single line as " JATO/ RATO", like it's done for ZLL/ ZLTO? conio.h • talk 02:58, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Should SRVL (Ship-borne Rolling Vertical Landing) be added? Described here: [1]
I was surprised not to find a link for standard horizontal takeoff and horizontal landing in the template? Am I overlooking something? Or is the template really just types of non-standard take-off and landing? Cheers. N2e ( talk) 15:11, 30 December 2010 (UTC)