This template was considered for merging with Template:Taylor Swift songs on 2017 December 1. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could whoever keeps changing this song's position to "Other songs" instead of "Singles" please explain his/her reasoning? The song is officially a single, I don't understand the problem here. The Mach Turtle ( talk) 18:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
@ 117.4.246.27: Right, it is not uncommon for dates to be included with a book or an album, or, for that matter, a concert. Second, cottagecore is a major theme of the works of Swift in 2020. Therefore, my edits were justified. In fact, the link to cottagecore was there for a while (since May this year) before you decided to remove it. Moreover, just because certain things have been there for a long time does not mean they should stay there. Appealing to tradition is a logical fallacy. Nerd271 ( talk) 05:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Nope. The categorization is necessary. How fast an article loads depends on the contents and your Internet connection. Nerd271 ( talk) 03:05, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Taylor's Version does not need to be put after the title of every rerecording. Just once in the list box. It's redundant beyond belief. It would make the template 3 times as large once all of the albums are commissioned. Just once. 130.156.22.252 ( talk) 16:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
This template was considered for merging with Template:Taylor Swift songs on 2017 December 1. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could whoever keeps changing this song's position to "Other songs" instead of "Singles" please explain his/her reasoning? The song is officially a single, I don't understand the problem here. The Mach Turtle ( talk) 18:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
@ 117.4.246.27: Right, it is not uncommon for dates to be included with a book or an album, or, for that matter, a concert. Second, cottagecore is a major theme of the works of Swift in 2020. Therefore, my edits were justified. In fact, the link to cottagecore was there for a while (since May this year) before you decided to remove it. Moreover, just because certain things have been there for a long time does not mean they should stay there. Appealing to tradition is a logical fallacy. Nerd271 ( talk) 05:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
Nope. The categorization is necessary. How fast an article loads depends on the contents and your Internet connection. Nerd271 ( talk) 03:05, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Taylor's Version does not need to be put after the title of every rerecording. Just once in the list box. It's redundant beyond belief. It would make the template 3 times as large once all of the albums are commissioned. Just once. 130.156.22.252 ( talk) 16:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)