Template:Taxonomy/Eukaryota is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's
sandbox. This template does not have a
testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage
here.
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Though there is little controversy that eukaryotes and archaeans are relatively closely related, the taxonomical name Neomura is not widely accepted. I suggest it not be included in this template. 02:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to make a request to have the "Domain: Eukaryota" always displayed in the "Template:Taxonomy" for the taxon "Rigifilida". Videsh Ramsahai ( talk) 12:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
{{
Edit template-protected}}
template. I think
Peter coxhead knows things and whether this is desirable or even possible.
Izno (
talk) 03:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
|always_display=
can only be placed in the taxonomy template of the taxon to which it applies. So you couldn't make it only display just for a hierarchy starting with the clade Rigifilida; if |always_display=yes
were added here, it would cause the domain to be displayed in every eukaryote taxobox, for which I'm sure there's no consensus.|always_display=yes
.This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can i pls get to edit
Pls 213.160.227.24 ( talk) 11:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Taxonomy/Dumbaryote has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Eukaryote to Dumbaryote. It has been scientifically proven that this term is correct. 203.170.10.38 ( talk) 02:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
62.30.188.114 ( talk) 10:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Domain:ekrutyka 2607:FB91:1974:1097:B0F6:5472:F072:A398 ( talk) 23:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Subspecies: C.D.terfficus 2607:FB91:1974:1097:B0F6:5472:F072:A398 ( talk) 23:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A eukaryote is a member of the domain "Eukarya" not "Eukaryota"; other old names include "Eucarya". Please use "Eukarya" as the current domain name. Many thanks. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit template-protected}}
template. Since there is no taxonomic reference listed in this template, it is challenging to determine what the current accepted term is. The article lists "Eukaryota" with "(Chatton, 1925) Whittaker & Margulis, 1978" as references, but I do not see those references listed in the article's sources. I see the later proposal by Margulis (1996), but no indication that the proposed new name is widely accepted. The article's sections on naming of the domain need to be cleaned up and properly sourced. I recommend a discussion on the talk page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 15:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
Template:Taxonomy/Eukaryota is permanently
protected from editing because it is a
heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by
consensus, editors may use {{
edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's
sandbox. This template does not have a
testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage
here.
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Though there is little controversy that eukaryotes and archaeans are relatively closely related, the taxonomical name Neomura is not widely accepted. I suggest it not be included in this template. 02:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I would like to make a request to have the "Domain: Eukaryota" always displayed in the "Template:Taxonomy" for the taxon "Rigifilida". Videsh Ramsahai ( talk) 12:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
{{
Edit template-protected}}
template. I think
Peter coxhead knows things and whether this is desirable or even possible.
Izno (
talk) 03:30, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
|always_display=
can only be placed in the taxonomy template of the taxon to which it applies. So you couldn't make it only display just for a hierarchy starting with the clade Rigifilida; if |always_display=yes
were added here, it would cause the domain to be displayed in every eukaryote taxobox, for which I'm sure there's no consensus.|always_display=yes
.This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can i pls get to edit
Pls 213.160.227.24 ( talk) 11:20, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:Taxonomy/Dumbaryote has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change Eukaryote to Dumbaryote. It has been scientifically proven that this term is correct. 203.170.10.38 ( talk) 02:35, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
62.30.188.114 ( talk) 10:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Domain:ekrutyka 2607:FB91:1974:1097:B0F6:5472:F072:A398 ( talk) 23:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Subspecies: C.D.terfficus 2607:FB91:1974:1097:B0F6:5472:F072:A398 ( talk) 23:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
A eukaryote is a member of the domain "Eukarya" not "Eukaryota"; other old names include "Eucarya". Please use "Eukarya" as the current domain name. Many thanks. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 14:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit template-protected}}
template. Since there is no taxonomic reference listed in this template, it is challenging to determine what the current accepted term is. The article lists "Eukaryota" with "(Chatton, 1925) Whittaker & Margulis, 1978" as references, but I do not see those references listed in the article's sources. I see the later proposal by Margulis (1996), but no indication that the proposed new name is widely accepted. The article's sections on naming of the domain need to be cleaned up and properly sourced. I recommend a discussion on the talk page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 15:11, 23 September 2023 (UTC)