Hello! , I am faelomx and I have much style. Already in serious, Is not taxobox something sober with that color plain? … Because something does not have life that is “on the life”? … then it can here have a visual improvement and dynamic in taxobox… and… improving what there is it can be taxobox but beautiful of all wikis! :) OK? …. what seems to them? You hope that you like,… will like…
Faelomx 09:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC) - [talk me]
[EN]Yes!, only this is a sample, you will be able to contribute but ideas to improve it. But for me I design this "pretty templatezz", but it is not obligatory, we can put to us in common, to do “global desing”.
[ES]No hace falta que sea igual que ésta, sino podemos debatir sobre el mejor diseño y listo!
Faelomx 10:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
test this --> http://es.pokemon.wikia.com/wiki/Usuario:Faelomx Faelomx 17:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Tyrannosaurus Temporal range:
Late Cretaceous
| |
---|---|
Very very dead
(an asteroid hit me) | |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Family: | |
Binomial name | |
Tyrannosaurus rex |
I've put the conservation status in its own section and added a diagramatic graphic thing. The diagram is slightly different if the taxon was evaluated with the old IUCN system (e.g. Orca) or the new system (e.g. Trocaz Pigeon). (The "status_system = iucn2.3" field that Beastie Bot was adding to taxoboxes was in anticipation of adding this graphic. It defaults to the new system.) If people hate the whole thing, it can be reverted. I don't add the graphic to extinct species (eg Golden Toad) because it would be in poor taste. — Pengo talk · contribs 09:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Any ideas on how to represent one of these timelines in 200px?: Geologic_timescale#Graphical_timelines — Pengo talk · contribs 23:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I've been trying to hide the Conservation Status when there's a fossil range, but haven't quite got it working (some white space keeps appearing).. anyone want to try getting it to work: try editing User:Pengo/taxobox and see the results at User:Pengo/taxotest. — Pengo talk · contribs 02:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I find the conservation status image to be just about the primary focal point of the entire article in species articles with no images. I think it would ideally be smaller and less obtrusive. -- Aranae 05:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Why would an graphic for "extinct" species be in poor taste? I don't see why. I think when you use these graphics for the IUCN categories, you need also one of the Extinct status, as it is one of the IUCN categories. I would also keep the other extinct statusses, like fossil. Peter Maas\ talk 13:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
There are plenty of species that are considered vulnerable, threatened, rare, endangered or even critically endangered, but do not appear on the Red List. The old taxobox format permitted such species to be listed as "Endangered" (for example), where "endangered" might be defined in some way other than the IUCN definition. The new taxobox format includes a IUCN-specific graphic that incorrectly implies that these species have been classified against the IUCN definition.
Consider for example the featured article Banksia brownii. This is listed as "Endangered" under Australia's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, yet does not appear on the Red List. When the article was featured, the taxobox simply said "Conservation Status: Endangered", which was entirely appropriate. Now it contains an IUCN-specific graphic which (a) incorrectly implies that it has been classified by the IUCN; and (b) incorrectly implies that "endangered" is used in accordance with the IUCN definition. As a consequence I have had to remove the conservation status from the taxobox. This is not acceptable.
Hesperian 00:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
| status = Endangered (EPBC 1999)
| status = EN | status_system = EPBC
The Extinct status should direct to Extinction.
Not being familiar much with templates, I came across a difficulty while trying to disambiguate Biological type. Is there a way that "type" links in taxoboxes could link directly to Type (botany) or Type (zoology) as appropriate and not to the Biological type disambiguation page? (See Asteraceae, for an example.) Thanks for any help, Figma 16:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Is it possible to prevent the pink bars from spilling into the borders? JMK 18:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
This issue came up when describing the status of the Chinese river dolphin, which is believed to be extinct or likely so. 204.52.215.107 21:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
can someone please add the heabrew interwiki? here it is:
he:תבנית:מיון
Whooping Crane | |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: |
Kemp's Ridley | |
---|---|
Researchers collecting Kemp's Ridley eggs | |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: |
If no one has any objections, I'd like to change the graphics for the conservation status images. I've updated them to be a bit cleaner, and use the colours used by Birdlife International (the official assessor of Red List categories for birds). I've already used this look for statuses assigned by the Australian government (e.g. see Banksia brownii), and so now the plan is to extend it to IUCN Red List categories, and also to NatureServe rankings.
Also you might notice I'd like to actually note which actual ranking system is being used within the description. This would default to being left off (as it is now) unless it was made explicit with, for example, "| status_system = iucn3.1".
They're circles to make the statuses more distinct from each other, as some don't slide into each other (namely from CR a status may jump EW straight to EX, and likewise LR/cd may be skipped). — Pengo talk · contribs 14:29, 25 December 2006 (UTC) (Happy xmas)
Baiji | |
---|---|
Scientific classification |
Hello! , I am faelomx and I have much style. Already in serious, Is not taxobox something sober with that color plain? … Because something does not have life that is “on the life”? … then it can here have a visual improvement and dynamic in taxobox… and… improving what there is it can be taxobox but beautiful of all wikis! :) OK? …. what seems to them? You hope that you like,… will like…
Faelomx 09:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC) - [talk me]
[EN]Yes!, only this is a sample, you will be able to contribute but ideas to improve it. But for me I design this "pretty templatezz", but it is not obligatory, we can put to us in common, to do “global desing”.
[ES]No hace falta que sea igual que ésta, sino podemos debatir sobre el mejor diseño y listo!
Faelomx 10:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
test this --> http://es.pokemon.wikia.com/wiki/Usuario:Faelomx Faelomx 17:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Tyrannosaurus Temporal range:
Late Cretaceous
| |
---|---|
Very very dead
(an asteroid hit me) | |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Family: | |
Binomial name | |
Tyrannosaurus rex |
I've put the conservation status in its own section and added a diagramatic graphic thing. The diagram is slightly different if the taxon was evaluated with the old IUCN system (e.g. Orca) or the new system (e.g. Trocaz Pigeon). (The "status_system = iucn2.3" field that Beastie Bot was adding to taxoboxes was in anticipation of adding this graphic. It defaults to the new system.) If people hate the whole thing, it can be reverted. I don't add the graphic to extinct species (eg Golden Toad) because it would be in poor taste. — Pengo talk · contribs 09:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Any ideas on how to represent one of these timelines in 200px?: Geologic_timescale#Graphical_timelines — Pengo talk · contribs 23:26, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
I've been trying to hide the Conservation Status when there's a fossil range, but haven't quite got it working (some white space keeps appearing).. anyone want to try getting it to work: try editing User:Pengo/taxobox and see the results at User:Pengo/taxotest. — Pengo talk · contribs 02:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
I find the conservation status image to be just about the primary focal point of the entire article in species articles with no images. I think it would ideally be smaller and less obtrusive. -- Aranae 05:53, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Why would an graphic for "extinct" species be in poor taste? I don't see why. I think when you use these graphics for the IUCN categories, you need also one of the Extinct status, as it is one of the IUCN categories. I would also keep the other extinct statusses, like fossil. Peter Maas\ talk 13:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
There are plenty of species that are considered vulnerable, threatened, rare, endangered or even critically endangered, but do not appear on the Red List. The old taxobox format permitted such species to be listed as "Endangered" (for example), where "endangered" might be defined in some way other than the IUCN definition. The new taxobox format includes a IUCN-specific graphic that incorrectly implies that these species have been classified against the IUCN definition.
Consider for example the featured article Banksia brownii. This is listed as "Endangered" under Australia's Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, yet does not appear on the Red List. When the article was featured, the taxobox simply said "Conservation Status: Endangered", which was entirely appropriate. Now it contains an IUCN-specific graphic which (a) incorrectly implies that it has been classified by the IUCN; and (b) incorrectly implies that "endangered" is used in accordance with the IUCN definition. As a consequence I have had to remove the conservation status from the taxobox. This is not acceptable.
Hesperian 00:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
| status = Endangered (EPBC 1999)
| status = EN | status_system = EPBC
The Extinct status should direct to Extinction.
Not being familiar much with templates, I came across a difficulty while trying to disambiguate Biological type. Is there a way that "type" links in taxoboxes could link directly to Type (botany) or Type (zoology) as appropriate and not to the Biological type disambiguation page? (See Asteraceae, for an example.) Thanks for any help, Figma 16:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Is it possible to prevent the pink bars from spilling into the borders? JMK 18:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
This issue came up when describing the status of the Chinese river dolphin, which is believed to be extinct or likely so. 204.52.215.107 21:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
can someone please add the heabrew interwiki? here it is:
he:תבנית:מיון
Whooping Crane | |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: |
Kemp's Ridley | |
---|---|
Researchers collecting Kemp's Ridley eggs | |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: |
If no one has any objections, I'd like to change the graphics for the conservation status images. I've updated them to be a bit cleaner, and use the colours used by Birdlife International (the official assessor of Red List categories for birds). I've already used this look for statuses assigned by the Australian government (e.g. see Banksia brownii), and so now the plan is to extend it to IUCN Red List categories, and also to NatureServe rankings.
Also you might notice I'd like to actually note which actual ranking system is being used within the description. This would default to being left off (as it is now) unless it was made explicit with, for example, "| status_system = iucn3.1".
They're circles to make the statuses more distinct from each other, as some don't slide into each other (namely from CR a status may jump EW straight to EX, and likewise LR/cd may be skipped). — Pengo talk · contribs 14:29, 25 December 2006 (UTC) (Happy xmas)
Baiji | |
---|---|
Scientific classification |