Politics Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 17 November 2023. The result of the discussion was "already merged". |
I'm colourblind, and some of these colours look identical to me, at least on my mobile device. The colours that look similar are:
Could the colours possibly be changed to make it easier for colourblind people to tell them apart? J.Gowers 19:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
This seems like an oversimplification. Under the ceremonial monarch, there could be any system of government actually running the country. Not sure what to do about it. Quequotion ( talk) 03:33, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I understand why one-party states are seperate, but technically a party-state is (probably allways) a republic. Shall we point towards this in brackets or put it with the republics? I am reluctant to put it under republics, because then you might as well put constitutional or semi-constitutional monarchies. So ill start the discussion by adding in brackets "by constitution republican". Nsae Comp ( talk) 08:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Correction:"in principle republics"; they are not necessarily republican, even if afterall republics, because republican implies an ideology and just being a republic is due to its res publica dimension as public-party state. And also not necessarily by constitution Nsae Comp ( talk) 08:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Well in short I think that this template is the wrong place to discuss if this type of republic is parliamentary or something else.
I think this discussion should first take place in the parliamentary republic article, since it is listed and included there. If it is seperated or listed as republic, only then would I change it here away and have for example only "Republic with ...".
Besides these countries are described as parliamentary republics in their articles, for example south africa.
Last but not least, if they are less parliamentary, then they should be semi-presidential, as such maybe the category should be dissolved and seperated out between parliamentary and semi-presidential. But I am not a fan of this, because i like the depth this category provides. Nsae Comp ( talk) 23:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. See you there. Nsae Comp ( talk) 11:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
This template was nominated for merging with Template:Forms of government map on 17 November 2023. The result of the discussion ( permanent link) was to merge. |
Politics Template‑class | |||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 17 November 2023. The result of the discussion was "already merged". |
I'm colourblind, and some of these colours look identical to me, at least on my mobile device. The colours that look similar are:
Could the colours possibly be changed to make it easier for colourblind people to tell them apart? J.Gowers 19:59, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
This seems like an oversimplification. Under the ceremonial monarch, there could be any system of government actually running the country. Not sure what to do about it. Quequotion ( talk) 03:33, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I understand why one-party states are seperate, but technically a party-state is (probably allways) a republic. Shall we point towards this in brackets or put it with the republics? I am reluctant to put it under republics, because then you might as well put constitutional or semi-constitutional monarchies. So ill start the discussion by adding in brackets "by constitution republican". Nsae Comp ( talk) 08:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Correction:"in principle republics"; they are not necessarily republican, even if afterall republics, because republican implies an ideology and just being a republic is due to its res publica dimension as public-party state. And also not necessarily by constitution Nsae Comp ( talk) 08:26, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Well in short I think that this template is the wrong place to discuss if this type of republic is parliamentary or something else.
I think this discussion should first take place in the parliamentary republic article, since it is listed and included there. If it is seperated or listed as republic, only then would I change it here away and have for example only "Republic with ...".
Besides these countries are described as parliamentary republics in their articles, for example south africa.
Last but not least, if they are less parliamentary, then they should be semi-presidential, as such maybe the category should be dissolved and seperated out between parliamentary and semi-presidential. But I am not a fan of this, because i like the depth this category provides. Nsae Comp ( talk) 23:55, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Thanks. See you there. Nsae Comp ( talk) 11:42, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
This template was nominated for merging with Template:Forms of government map on 17 November 2023. The result of the discussion ( permanent link) was to merge. |