Politics: Political parties Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Serbia Template‑class | |||||||
|
I'm just wondering - should we include national Serb parties outside Serbia to this template? Any thoughts? -- PaxEquilibrium 22:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I do not understand why certain parties are in the "major" section, whilst others are in the "minor". For example, United Serbia has only three seats, the Serb Renewal Movement 4 and the LSV five seats; why are the Hungarian Coalition and the Sanjak Democratic Party classed as "minor" parties, when they both have 4 seats. The SDP even has a government ministry
[1] There should be a cut-off point in terms of seats that makes a party "major" or "minor" (I would suggest that all five mentioned above are classed as minor, because 11 "major" political parties is more than seems appropriate).
Perhaps it would be more appropriate to group the political parties as "Current Minor" and "Current Major", to emphasize that this is purely a statistical choice (as I suggested above).
I'm also wondering if the "On other parties' lists" section is appropriate, given that all parties are elected as part of an alliance (be it ZES, DSS-NS or the reserved seats on the LDP and SRS lists) and are therefore on a greater list. Maybe these should just be "minor" parties? --
Andrewginger (
talk) 23:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone provide confirmation on the exact distribution of seats following the 2012 election? Buttons ( talk) 04:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
This template only includes parties thst have seats in the National Assembly but not ones that don't. Doesn't anyone think it ought to? Charles Essie ( talk) 21:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Green Party (Serbia) instead of Greens of Serbia
80.187.99.55 ( talk) 06:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Politics: Political parties Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Serbia Template‑class | |||||||
|
I'm just wondering - should we include national Serb parties outside Serbia to this template? Any thoughts? -- PaxEquilibrium 22:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
I do not understand why certain parties are in the "major" section, whilst others are in the "minor". For example, United Serbia has only three seats, the Serb Renewal Movement 4 and the LSV five seats; why are the Hungarian Coalition and the Sanjak Democratic Party classed as "minor" parties, when they both have 4 seats. The SDP even has a government ministry
[1] There should be a cut-off point in terms of seats that makes a party "major" or "minor" (I would suggest that all five mentioned above are classed as minor, because 11 "major" political parties is more than seems appropriate).
Perhaps it would be more appropriate to group the political parties as "Current Minor" and "Current Major", to emphasize that this is purely a statistical choice (as I suggested above).
I'm also wondering if the "On other parties' lists" section is appropriate, given that all parties are elected as part of an alliance (be it ZES, DSS-NS or the reserved seats on the LDP and SRS lists) and are therefore on a greater list. Maybe these should just be "minor" parties? --
Andrewginger (
talk) 23:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Can anyone provide confirmation on the exact distribution of seats following the 2012 election? Buttons ( talk) 04:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
This template only includes parties thst have seats in the National Assembly but not ones that don't. Doesn't anyone think it ought to? Charles Essie ( talk) 21:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Green Party (Serbia) instead of Greens of Serbia
80.187.99.55 ( talk) 06:43, 18 June 2016 (UTC)