This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
In addition to saints, I am planning to use this stub for articles about
venerables and
beatified people. Does anyone have a problem with this? --
Eoghanacht 21:08, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)
This stub does need another image (icon)
There is a saint-stub.
It is used in many countries.
And as you know the Christianity was divided about 1000 year ago.
And the saint-stub uses the icon of Francisk from Assisi.
But he is not a saint for some Churches.
Therefore we need (in that stub) to use a saint that are accepted in all Churches.
Then he must be from time before 1000.
I suggest the
Saint George.
What do you say? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
78.25.120.81 (
talk) 15:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)reply
I see your point. Personally I'd prefer the image that
the portal,
navbox, and (in a slightly different version) the
project template use, namely:
File:Gloriole blur.svg. That would be consistent, visually appealing (unlike rendering any face at a very low resolution), and neural (all major Churches use halos to represent saints, and a halo alone represents no particular saint; the visual tradition dates back to early Christianity). The lead image of the article
Saint also features halos. That association is strong. –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs) 01:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)reply
This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
In addition to saints, I am planning to use this stub for articles about
venerables and
beatified people. Does anyone have a problem with this? --
Eoghanacht 21:08, 2005 Jun 1 (UTC)
This stub does need another image (icon)
There is a saint-stub.
It is used in many countries.
And as you know the Christianity was divided about 1000 year ago.
And the saint-stub uses the icon of Francisk from Assisi.
But he is not a saint for some Churches.
Therefore we need (in that stub) to use a saint that are accepted in all Churches.
Then he must be from time before 1000.
I suggest the
Saint George.
What do you say? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
78.25.120.81 (
talk) 15:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)reply
I see your point. Personally I'd prefer the image that
the portal,
navbox, and (in a slightly different version) the
project template use, namely:
File:Gloriole blur.svg. That would be consistent, visually appealing (unlike rendering any face at a very low resolution), and neural (all major Churches use halos to represent saints, and a halo alone represents no particular saint; the visual tradition dates back to early Christianity). The lead image of the article
Saint also features halos. That association is strong. –
Finnusertop (
talk ⋅
contribs) 01:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)reply