This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Russian invasion of Ukraine template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi fellow wikipedians! I was just wondering if the 'ships' list is needed. If we feel it is, it can probably get it's own sublist. Please comment opinions below, so we can get WP:CONSENSUS Tomorrow and tomorrow ( talk) 02:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't see the Minsk agreements in the table. It seems to be a solid basis for coming negociations. [1] Should we add them, create a "Background" row ? Yug (talk) 🐲 00:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
References
I don't think we need the organisations response row, at least as it currently is. The international legion is made of the public and Kletocapture is run by the US government so really should be in 'States'. The IT army is part of Ukriane's forces so I don't think they quite fit there either. If this section was to exist, it should be for NGOs and sports organisations, etc Tomorrow and tomorrow ( talk) 00:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Does anyone know how to make the cell widths consistent? Would make the template look more presentable. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello the team,
The page
Weapons of the Russo-Ukrainian War now accepts contents related to the 2022 war and could be integrated into this template.
Yug
(talk) 🐲 16:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, let's have a link to a non-existant article on the English Wikipedia and to justify that add an interwiki link to a project written in a completely different script that most of us can't come close to reading. How convenient and constructive of us! ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 16:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
There's a minor edit war going on regarding people with en.Wikipedia articles who are associated in some way or other with the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine: list just a few key people, or all associated people? There exists Category:Lists of people and even Category:Lists of lists of people, so if someone wanted to start an article such as List of people assoicated with the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, then that could become a link in the current People heading, and some of the people less notably associated with the invasion and its consequences could be removed from the navbox. A consensus name would have to be chosen: "associated with" is rather long-winded, but "of" risks sounding like these are people who organised/supported/carried out the invasion (some are, some aren't). Even "associated with" is a bit risky. Maybe "in" or "during", though then the meaning would sound weird. Better ask for advice at Wikipedia talk:Stand-alone lists where people are active in making/editing WP:STANDALONE list articles and could probably recommend a name likely to obtain consensus. Boud ( talk) 15:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
all play a substantial role. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 16:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article.That puts the final nail in the coffin for 5 of the articles I listed above. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 19:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article.If you can find public, reliably sourced information (Ukrainian or Russian language sources are allowed, although English language ones are preferred) showing how Denys Shmyhal is involved in this event, then that can be added to his article and the inclusion here would become better justified. I have no idea whether it's better or worse in terms of security risks for Shmyhal's actions (presumably in organising resistance against the invasion) to be listed at Denys Shmyhal. If it's better that his involvement remains non-public for the moment, then his article can wait to be linked in the navbox after the Russian forces leave Ukraine and it's safe for that knowledge to become public. Similarly for the other articles. Boud ( talk) 02:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
I suggest that user:Boud starts separate discussions about each name that s/he wants to remove from the template.--Getting consensus about removing the Ukrainian PM from the template, is likely an uphill battle. 89.8.146.21 ( talk) 10:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
46.211.152.40, as you continue to refuse to discuss your edit, I will start this discussion for you. No one is denying that Horlivka is in Eastern Ukraine or Chuhuiv is in Northeastern Ukraine. But as I have explained, this navbox must match their articles and the List of military engagements during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine article, neither of which state they are part of the Eastern Ukraine or Northeastern Ukraine offensives. If you have a problem with that, I suggest you raise this issue on the aforementioned articles' talk pages to have them amended, instead of edit-warring or making snarky edit summaries. Pinging @ EpicWikiLad as well in case they have any comments. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 22:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
see map), this could have been resolved much faster. I will adjust the articles accordingly, unless there is objection from other users. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 22:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
would it be considered a attack on civilian or military targets? because, by definition, a valid military target is something that contributes to the war, and a fertilizer factory doesnt really contribute to the war. 187.39.133.201 ( talk) 21:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi All,
I think that the Consecration of Russia should go in the public section as the action was taken by the Catholic Church, and more broadly the Catholic population (pope explicitly asked people to participate).
@ InfiniteNexus: reverted this on the grounds that the Vatican is a state. While it definitely is, the Church and Catholics more broadly is usually considered not governmental (including on Wikipedia). Given that the consecration wasn't a state-like action (no other governments are leading consecrations) and in no way relates to the governing or leading of the Vatican State, I believe it shouldn't be considered a State Reaction, otherwise any action taken by a Catholic Authority must also be considered a government action.
Please comment your thoughts so we can gain consensus. Tomorrow and tomorrow ( talk) 04:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
States and churches? Because putting the Catholic Church next to city demonstrations and computer malware doesn't seem right to me. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 04:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
While Assassination attempts on Volodymyr Zelenskyy are certainly a horrible thing, Zelenskyy is the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, which would seem to make him (and Putin) military targets, in the case that they cannot be detained by the opposing military forces. There have been suggestions that some of the Ukrainian forces have been deliberately aiming to kill Russian generals, though we don't have an individual article on that. Any objections to removing Assassination attempts on Volodymyr Zelenskyy from the War crimes section? It should be shifted to a new subsection of Military engagements, with a name like Assassination attempts on military leaders. Boud ( talk) 22:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
@ Pinoccappuccino: I don't think we should be adding superscript designators, much less emojis, to this navbox. We already have List of military engagements during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine denoting the status of each battle. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 17:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
This navbox is getting rather large. I'm thinking we may need to switch to {{
Navbox with collapsible groups}} to ease navigation, any thoughts on that? You can see what that would look like by changing Navbox
at the top of the template to Navbox with collapsible groups
, and then click preview.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 17:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
|selected=
parameter to uncollapse the relevant sections.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 22:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)The navbox continues to grow exponentially in size. @ Boud, Super Dromaeosaurus, Tomorrow and tomorrow, Elijahandskip, and 唐吉訶德的侍從: do you support or oppose switching this navbox to {{ Navbox with collapsible groups}}? Examples can be found here and here. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 18:05, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
:)
--
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they) 22:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)someone will also have to go into each of the gazillion articles here and add a |selected=
parameter to uncollapse the relevant sections
, I don't mind opening a gazillion browser tabs and editing in (almost) parallel, so if others don't do it, I would probably have a go at some of this work - it doesn't sound too difficult.
Boud (
talk) 21:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
|selected=Reactions
,
Ghost of Kyiv would be |selected=Impact
, etc.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 21:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)|selected=
parameter can be invoked with just {{2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine|name}}
. I've just added in abbr
values to designate what to put in the name
field.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 21:31, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
There seems to be consensus to switch, so I'm going to go ahead and implement the change. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 17:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
|Overview
to all of the articles in the first row (General). Further instructions can be found in the template documentation.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 17:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Hi InfiniteNexus, why did you remove the link to REPowerEU without explanation [1]? A very large number of pages listed on this template exist probably because of red links that were first placed here. Just today I added a link to Headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief [2] and there's already a draft of it [3]. I don't know if this is some kind of policy but per Wikipedia:Ignore all rules, all rules preventing improvement of the Wikipedia may be ignored, and I don't see how removing a red link from where a lot of red links have gotten their pages is an improvement. Super Ψ Dro 18:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
there should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template. Topics such as the Headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief have interlanguage links to actual articles, so it is acceptable to retain those. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 20:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
As you may have noticed, I haven't checked in in a while, and was completely taken aback today when I was greeted with over a dozen redlinks in the navbox. While I'm more lenient toward the interlanguage links, I really think we shouldn't be adding in redlinks that do not have an article on any Wikipedia site. There is WP:NORUSH to create any of those articles, and should anyone find those topics notable they will naturally create it, and then we can add them here. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 00:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
@ Osunpokeh: In this edit, you introduced "Russian" into the short name (displayed name) for war crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. While the overwhelming majority of the likely war crimes we have documented in the various war crimes articles are attributed to Russian forces, not all of the crimes are attributed to Russians, and almost none of the legal cases have their scope restricted to Russians or the Russian Federation as the suspected perpetrator. If you want to rename the main war crimes article to Russian war crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, then please propose that on the talk page there rather than making a change here. However, my prediction is a WP:SNOW rejection of the proposal: it would not be encyclopedic to restrict the scope that way. Boud ( talk) 15:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I suggest adding a mention of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES-11/4 article under Reactions->United Nations->Emergency special session as the other 3 resolutions are. This one is very important and notable, so it should be there. CrazyPredictor ( talk) 19:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to add a Wikipedia article link in the War Crimes, Attacks on civilians, the Wikipedia article is called Shelling of Ivano-Frankivsk, and it involves the attack on a civilian airport, a coal factory, and a warehouse, so I personally believes it belongs there, and, again, I'd like to add it. RowanJ LP ( talk) 03:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change the Russian occupation of Kharkiv from 'ongoing' to 'previous', owing to the end of Russian occupation after the Kharkiv counteroffensive. ArqueKappa ( talk) 03:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
add Kyrylo Budanov to the Ukrainian key people list as the HUR (Main Intelligence Service) has played a large role in this war. FiveStars1234 ( talk) 19:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
This article ( 2022 Rivne missile strikes) is missing.
I'd also suggest moving the strikes on Zhytomyr to the military engagements part, as well as removing some duplicate strike stuff (Vinnytsya, Dnipro, etc in the war crimes part).
SnoopyBird ( talk) 16:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
There has been an ongoing edit war for almost a month that has been changing this template which is on many highly viwed articles (2022 russian invasion of Ukraine, Battle of Kiev, Kherson counteroffensive, etc.) at least once a day. Could we please have a discussion rather than continue to revert edits. Starship 24 ( talk) 22:09, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
We should separate the prelude stuff from the overview sub-template (is that what you call it?) into its own sub-template because there are a lot of really specific links in there (like Stanytsia Luhanska kindergarten bombing). They are too specific for the overview tab. Mucube ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
This Infobox is used on several Wikipedia pages and changes are currently being discussed on the Talk page of Russian invasion of Ukraine at this time. All comments welcome from editors. Pinging Compusolus and other interested editors. ErnestKrause ( talk) 20:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Revert all recent edits by User:Teterev53 to this template, as they were made to match his mass moves, which have now been reverted by WP:RMUM. 90.255.19.247 ( talk) 07:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit extended-protected}}
template.
Cherrell410(
t ·
c) 15:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
could Naval warfare in the Russian invasion of Ukraine be added to "General" under "Overview" in the navbox, near Aerial warfare in the Russian invasion of Ukraine? Aqeccac ( talk) 08:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Slovakia should be removed from the Reactions/Other Countries section. Calling the 2023 Slovak parliamentary election and Robert Fico's mere existence the country's reaction to the Russian invasion of Ukraine makes no sense and doesn't fit in with the rest of the listed examples. MMK229 ( talk) 14:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello! Please add 2 January 2024 Russian strikes on Ukraine to the War crimes -> Attack on civilians list in the navbox.
It is a massive attack, and even though the article is probably still too small, the event absolutely deserves an article because it was one of the biggest missile strikes so far. MonX94 ( talk) 15:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please can the 2024 Korochansky Ilyushin IL-76 crash be added to the "Related" section of the navbox. Aqeccac ( talk) 10:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add a link to United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/77/229 in the United Nations section. Doublah ( talk) 13:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Done Killarnee ( talk) 23:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add Violations of non-combatant airspaces during the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the "Impact" section. thanks Aqeccac ( talk) 09:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Russian invasion of Ukraine template. |
|
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi fellow wikipedians! I was just wondering if the 'ships' list is needed. If we feel it is, it can probably get it's own sublist. Please comment opinions below, so we can get WP:CONSENSUS Tomorrow and tomorrow ( talk) 02:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
I don't see the Minsk agreements in the table. It seems to be a solid basis for coming negociations. [1] Should we add them, create a "Background" row ? Yug (talk) 🐲 00:32, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
References
I don't think we need the organisations response row, at least as it currently is. The international legion is made of the public and Kletocapture is run by the US government so really should be in 'States'. The IT army is part of Ukriane's forces so I don't think they quite fit there either. If this section was to exist, it should be for NGOs and sports organisations, etc Tomorrow and tomorrow ( talk) 00:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Does anyone know how to make the cell widths consistent? Would make the template look more presentable. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Hello the team,
The page
Weapons of the Russo-Ukrainian War now accepts contents related to the 2022 war and could be integrated into this template.
Yug
(talk) 🐲 16:50, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, let's have a link to a non-existant article on the English Wikipedia and to justify that add an interwiki link to a project written in a completely different script that most of us can't come close to reading. How convenient and constructive of us! ~Styyx Talk? ^-^ 16:15, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
There's a minor edit war going on regarding people with en.Wikipedia articles who are associated in some way or other with the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine: list just a few key people, or all associated people? There exists Category:Lists of people and even Category:Lists of lists of people, so if someone wanted to start an article such as List of people assoicated with the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, then that could become a link in the current People heading, and some of the people less notably associated with the invasion and its consequences could be removed from the navbox. A consensus name would have to be chosen: "associated with" is rather long-winded, but "of" risks sounding like these are people who organised/supported/carried out the invasion (some are, some aren't). Even "associated with" is a bit risky. Maybe "in" or "during", though then the meaning would sound weird. Better ask for advice at Wikipedia talk:Stand-alone lists where people are active in making/editing WP:STANDALONE list articles and could probably recommend a name likely to obtain consensus. Boud ( talk) 15:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
all play a substantial role. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 16:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article.That puts the final nail in the coffin for 5 of the articles I listed above. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 19:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
The subject of the template should be mentioned in every article.If you can find public, reliably sourced information (Ukrainian or Russian language sources are allowed, although English language ones are preferred) showing how Denys Shmyhal is involved in this event, then that can be added to his article and the inclusion here would become better justified. I have no idea whether it's better or worse in terms of security risks for Shmyhal's actions (presumably in organising resistance against the invasion) to be listed at Denys Shmyhal. If it's better that his involvement remains non-public for the moment, then his article can wait to be linked in the navbox after the Russian forces leave Ukraine and it's safe for that knowledge to become public. Similarly for the other articles. Boud ( talk) 02:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
I suggest that user:Boud starts separate discussions about each name that s/he wants to remove from the template.--Getting consensus about removing the Ukrainian PM from the template, is likely an uphill battle. 89.8.146.21 ( talk) 10:38, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
46.211.152.40, as you continue to refuse to discuss your edit, I will start this discussion for you. No one is denying that Horlivka is in Eastern Ukraine or Chuhuiv is in Northeastern Ukraine. But as I have explained, this navbox must match their articles and the List of military engagements during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine article, neither of which state they are part of the Eastern Ukraine or Northeastern Ukraine offensives. If you have a problem with that, I suggest you raise this issue on the aforementioned articles' talk pages to have them amended, instead of edit-warring or making snarky edit summaries. Pinging @ EpicWikiLad as well in case they have any comments. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 22:27, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
see map), this could have been resolved much faster. I will adjust the articles accordingly, unless there is objection from other users. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 22:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
would it be considered a attack on civilian or military targets? because, by definition, a valid military target is something that contributes to the war, and a fertilizer factory doesnt really contribute to the war. 187.39.133.201 ( talk) 21:53, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi All,
I think that the Consecration of Russia should go in the public section as the action was taken by the Catholic Church, and more broadly the Catholic population (pope explicitly asked people to participate).
@ InfiniteNexus: reverted this on the grounds that the Vatican is a state. While it definitely is, the Church and Catholics more broadly is usually considered not governmental (including on Wikipedia). Given that the consecration wasn't a state-like action (no other governments are leading consecrations) and in no way relates to the governing or leading of the Vatican State, I believe it shouldn't be considered a State Reaction, otherwise any action taken by a Catholic Authority must also be considered a government action.
Please comment your thoughts so we can gain consensus. Tomorrow and tomorrow ( talk) 04:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
States and churches? Because putting the Catholic Church next to city demonstrations and computer malware doesn't seem right to me. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 04:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
While Assassination attempts on Volodymyr Zelenskyy are certainly a horrible thing, Zelenskyy is the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, which would seem to make him (and Putin) military targets, in the case that they cannot be detained by the opposing military forces. There have been suggestions that some of the Ukrainian forces have been deliberately aiming to kill Russian generals, though we don't have an individual article on that. Any objections to removing Assassination attempts on Volodymyr Zelenskyy from the War crimes section? It should be shifted to a new subsection of Military engagements, with a name like Assassination attempts on military leaders. Boud ( talk) 22:26, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
@ Pinoccappuccino: I don't think we should be adding superscript designators, much less emojis, to this navbox. We already have List of military engagements during the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine denoting the status of each battle. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 17:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
This navbox is getting rather large. I'm thinking we may need to switch to {{
Navbox with collapsible groups}} to ease navigation, any thoughts on that? You can see what that would look like by changing Navbox
at the top of the template to Navbox with collapsible groups
, and then click preview.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 17:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
|selected=
parameter to uncollapse the relevant sections.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 22:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)The navbox continues to grow exponentially in size. @ Boud, Super Dromaeosaurus, Tomorrow and tomorrow, Elijahandskip, and 唐吉訶德的侍從: do you support or oppose switching this navbox to {{ Navbox with collapsible groups}}? Examples can be found here and here. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 18:05, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
:)
--
Tamzin
cetacean needed (she/they) 22:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)someone will also have to go into each of the gazillion articles here and add a |selected=
parameter to uncollapse the relevant sections
, I don't mind opening a gazillion browser tabs and editing in (almost) parallel, so if others don't do it, I would probably have a go at some of this work - it doesn't sound too difficult.
Boud (
talk) 21:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
|selected=Reactions
,
Ghost of Kyiv would be |selected=Impact
, etc.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 21:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)|selected=
parameter can be invoked with just {{2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine|name}}
. I've just added in abbr
values to designate what to put in the name
field.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 21:31, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
There seems to be consensus to switch, so I'm going to go ahead and implement the change. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 17:22, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
|Overview
to all of the articles in the first row (General). Further instructions can be found in the template documentation.
InfiniteNexus (
talk) 17:58, 14 April 2022 (UTC)Hi InfiniteNexus, why did you remove the link to REPowerEU without explanation [1]? A very large number of pages listed on this template exist probably because of red links that were first placed here. Just today I added a link to Headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief [2] and there's already a draft of it [3]. I don't know if this is some kind of policy but per Wikipedia:Ignore all rules, all rules preventing improvement of the Wikipedia may be ignored, and I don't see how removing a red link from where a lot of red links have gotten their pages is an improvement. Super Ψ Dro 18:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
there should be a Wikipedia article on the subject of the template. Topics such as the Headquarters of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief have interlanguage links to actual articles, so it is acceptable to retain those. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 20:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
As you may have noticed, I haven't checked in in a while, and was completely taken aback today when I was greeted with over a dozen redlinks in the navbox. While I'm more lenient toward the interlanguage links, I really think we shouldn't be adding in redlinks that do not have an article on any Wikipedia site. There is WP:NORUSH to create any of those articles, and should anyone find those topics notable they will naturally create it, and then we can add them here. InfiniteNexus ( talk) 00:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
@ Osunpokeh: In this edit, you introduced "Russian" into the short name (displayed name) for war crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. While the overwhelming majority of the likely war crimes we have documented in the various war crimes articles are attributed to Russian forces, not all of the crimes are attributed to Russians, and almost none of the legal cases have their scope restricted to Russians or the Russian Federation as the suspected perpetrator. If you want to rename the main war crimes article to Russian war crimes in the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, then please propose that on the talk page there rather than making a change here. However, my prediction is a WP:SNOW rejection of the proposal: it would not be encyclopedic to restrict the scope that way. Boud ( talk) 15:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I suggest adding a mention of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution ES-11/4 article under Reactions->United Nations->Emergency special session as the other 3 resolutions are. This one is very important and notable, so it should be there. CrazyPredictor ( talk) 19:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to add a Wikipedia article link in the War Crimes, Attacks on civilians, the Wikipedia article is called Shelling of Ivano-Frankivsk, and it involves the attack on a civilian airport, a coal factory, and a warehouse, so I personally believes it belongs there, and, again, I'd like to add it. RowanJ LP ( talk) 03:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change the Russian occupation of Kharkiv from 'ongoing' to 'previous', owing to the end of Russian occupation after the Kharkiv counteroffensive. ArqueKappa ( talk) 03:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Template:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
add Kyrylo Budanov to the Ukrainian key people list as the HUR (Main Intelligence Service) has played a large role in this war. FiveStars1234 ( talk) 19:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
This article ( 2022 Rivne missile strikes) is missing.
I'd also suggest moving the strikes on Zhytomyr to the military engagements part, as well as removing some duplicate strike stuff (Vinnytsya, Dnipro, etc in the war crimes part).
SnoopyBird ( talk) 16:56, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
There has been an ongoing edit war for almost a month that has been changing this template which is on many highly viwed articles (2022 russian invasion of Ukraine, Battle of Kiev, Kherson counteroffensive, etc.) at least once a day. Could we please have a discussion rather than continue to revert edits. Starship 24 ( talk) 22:09, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
We should separate the prelude stuff from the overview sub-template (is that what you call it?) into its own sub-template because there are a lot of really specific links in there (like Stanytsia Luhanska kindergarten bombing). They are too specific for the overview tab. Mucube ( talk • contribs) 03:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
This Infobox is used on several Wikipedia pages and changes are currently being discussed on the Talk page of Russian invasion of Ukraine at this time. All comments welcome from editors. Pinging Compusolus and other interested editors. ErnestKrause ( talk) 20:45, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Revert all recent edits by User:Teterev53 to this template, as they were made to match his mass moves, which have now been reverted by WP:RMUM. 90.255.19.247 ( talk) 07:25, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
{{
Edit extended-protected}}
template.
Cherrell410(
t ·
c) 15:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC)This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
could Naval warfare in the Russian invasion of Ukraine be added to "General" under "Overview" in the navbox, near Aerial warfare in the Russian invasion of Ukraine? Aqeccac ( talk) 08:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Slovakia should be removed from the Reactions/Other Countries section. Calling the 2023 Slovak parliamentary election and Robert Fico's mere existence the country's reaction to the Russian invasion of Ukraine makes no sense and doesn't fit in with the rest of the listed examples. MMK229 ( talk) 14:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello! Please add 2 January 2024 Russian strikes on Ukraine to the War crimes -> Attack on civilians list in the navbox.
It is a massive attack, and even though the article is probably still too small, the event absolutely deserves an article because it was one of the biggest missile strikes so far. MonX94 ( talk) 15:57, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please can the 2024 Korochansky Ilyushin IL-76 crash be added to the "Related" section of the navbox. Aqeccac ( talk) 10:23, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add a link to United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/77/229 in the United Nations section. Doublah ( talk) 13:47, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Done Killarnee ( talk) 23:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add Violations of non-combatant airspaces during the Russian invasion of Ukraine to the "Impact" section. thanks Aqeccac ( talk) 09:06, 24 March 2024 (UTC)