Romania Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
The colonisation of a region in 22 years does not make it a "Romanian historical region". If you don't wanna leave Dobruja alone, put norhern Dobruja as "such a region" but southern Dobruja is definitely not such. VMORO 20:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
what makes a region a "romanian historical region"? Anonimu 18:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
I must stress again that this template includes all teritories that for a certain period of time, from 1862 until now, were part of Romania. The irredentism accusations have no base. I believe we are in the XXIth century, not the XIXth or XXth. The censorship of history and extremist views should be left apart. -- Alex:Dan ( talk) 19:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Both templates given as examples are essentially different from this one. First, they make it very clear when the region were part of the respective subject, not implying one moment that the regions may be part of the subject today. Second, most of the elements listed were what in modern speech is called administrative divisions during the time frame mentioned, which is not the case for any of the regions listed here. Third, none has any irredentist map to show the supposed rightfull territorial extent of the subject. There's nothing wrong about presenting historical region in present day Romania. A historical region means a territory that historically has shared cultural, political, social, religious or ethnic traits and that, without having any administrative importance today, still has characteristics that differentiate it in a modern state, be it a dialect, a custom, or any other idiosincrasy. The Polish templates shares the same traits as the other two templates, and makes it clear that it has nothing to do with territorial extension of modern Poland. Xasha ( talk) 20:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Template:Romanian historical regions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Moldopodo ( talk) 09:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Romania Template‑class | ||||||||||||||
|
The colonisation of a region in 22 years does not make it a "Romanian historical region". If you don't wanna leave Dobruja alone, put norhern Dobruja as "such a region" but southern Dobruja is definitely not such. VMORO 20:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
what makes a region a "romanian historical region"? Anonimu 18:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
I must stress again that this template includes all teritories that for a certain period of time, from 1862 until now, were part of Romania. The irredentism accusations have no base. I believe we are in the XXIth century, not the XIXth or XXth. The censorship of history and extremist views should be left apart. -- Alex:Dan ( talk) 19:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Both templates given as examples are essentially different from this one. First, they make it very clear when the region were part of the respective subject, not implying one moment that the regions may be part of the subject today. Second, most of the elements listed were what in modern speech is called administrative divisions during the time frame mentioned, which is not the case for any of the regions listed here. Third, none has any irredentist map to show the supposed rightfull territorial extent of the subject. There's nothing wrong about presenting historical region in present day Romania. A historical region means a territory that historically has shared cultural, political, social, religious or ethnic traits and that, without having any administrative importance today, still has characteristics that differentiate it in a modern state, be it a dialect, a custom, or any other idiosincrasy. The Polish templates shares the same traits as the other two templates, and makes it clear that it has nothing to do with territorial extension of modern Poland. Xasha ( talk) 20:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Template:Romanian historical regions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Moldopodo ( talk) 09:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)