From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon Florida Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Sections

Why is there a "rivers" sction and an "other rivers" section? Why not just have one section for rivers? 76.188.183.123 ( talk) 19:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Entries From The Salt Lagoon

I was including those on the basis of their being named as "River" or "Lake", but if you think it's better off without 'em I reckon I can live with that. - Aerobird 04:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Names can be misleading; the Indian River and Banana River are part of the Indian River Lagoon, but so are the Mosquito Lagoon and Hobe Sound (which doesn't have an article yet). I think it's a matter of where to draw the line, and the distinction freshwater/salt water makes sense to me. If you include Indian River and Lake Worth (which are lagoons), then you should also include Biscayne Bay, another lagoon. Maybe a template for coastal waters of Florida would be a good place for the lagoons, bays, etc. -- Donald Albury 01:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC) reply
"Maybe a template for coastal waters of Florida"
The monster lives... :-)
- Aerobird 01:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Lake Tohopekaliga references

While they are indeed referred to locally as Lake "Toho", I believe the entire lake name should be used in the WP box(es). Does anyone else have an opinion or otherwise care to comment? -- Jasap 00:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject icon Florida Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Sections

Why is there a "rivers" sction and an "other rivers" section? Why not just have one section for rivers? 76.188.183.123 ( talk) 19:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Entries From The Salt Lagoon

I was including those on the basis of their being named as "River" or "Lake", but if you think it's better off without 'em I reckon I can live with that. - Aerobird 04:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Names can be misleading; the Indian River and Banana River are part of the Indian River Lagoon, but so are the Mosquito Lagoon and Hobe Sound (which doesn't have an article yet). I think it's a matter of where to draw the line, and the distinction freshwater/salt water makes sense to me. If you include Indian River and Lake Worth (which are lagoons), then you should also include Biscayne Bay, another lagoon. Maybe a template for coastal waters of Florida would be a good place for the lagoons, bays, etc. -- Donald Albury 01:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC) reply
"Maybe a template for coastal waters of Florida"
The monster lives... :-)
- Aerobird 01:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Lake Tohopekaliga references

While they are indeed referred to locally as Lake "Toho", I believe the entire lake name should be used in the WP box(es). Does anyone else have an opinion or otherwise care to comment? -- Jasap 00:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook