Invention Template‑class | |||||||
|
I removed the outputs section; I would consider that out of scope for this navbox, since there are already other navboxes devoted to {{ Academic publishing}} and {{ Science and the public}}, and it's not possible to do justice to those subjects here without adding too much redundant content to this navbox. Biogeographist ( talk) 13:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Biogeographist: Agreed. Jamzze ( talk) 22:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Jamzze: You suddenly completely redefined "Approaches"! Abductive/deductive/inductive is just a schema of types of inference commonly used in everyday life, not just in research, and so is not especially important for this navbox.
Also, as I already mentioned in one of my edit summaries on this navbox, please don't link to redirects in navboxes, as explained at
WP:NAVNOREDIRECT. For example, you shouldn't link to [[Deductive]]
, which is a redirect; instead you should link to [[Deductive reasoning|Deductive]]
. Then the link will turn black in the navbox on the
Deductive reasoning page.
Biogeographist (
talk) 22:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Biogeographist: thanks for this, I was refining these definitions. Inductive/ deductive, abductive approaches fits better, where as a research strategy better reflects describing qual, quant, etc from reading further on this through Bryam (2012) Social Research methods. It would be important to revert back to the changes I made as they better reflect on the research process. Inductive, deductive, abductive approaches are key ways research is framed, I would suggest their individual pages need further updating to reflect their importance to the research process. Including these within the sidebar would be extremely beneficial for readers to link this within their learning of research overall. Jamzze ( talk) 22:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Biogeographist: Thank you for changing the image. It is potentially not inclusive, however, of research as it is specific to a particular part of it. Then again, saying that, it might be very difficult to find an inclusive image without having something specifically created to depict 'research'. Jamzze ( talk) 23:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Feel free to take a shot at improving on the image.Biogeographist ( talk) 18:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
@ Geysirhead: I removed the scientometrics section that you added. Above in § Removed outputs, we agreed that this template is about the process of research, and the outputs of research are out of scope for this template; scientometrics are already covered in the {{ Academic publishing}} template. Biogeographist ( talk) 17:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Invention Template‑class | |||||||
|
I removed the outputs section; I would consider that out of scope for this navbox, since there are already other navboxes devoted to {{ Academic publishing}} and {{ Science and the public}}, and it's not possible to do justice to those subjects here without adding too much redundant content to this navbox. Biogeographist ( talk) 13:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Biogeographist: Agreed. Jamzze ( talk) 22:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Jamzze: You suddenly completely redefined "Approaches"! Abductive/deductive/inductive is just a schema of types of inference commonly used in everyday life, not just in research, and so is not especially important for this navbox.
Also, as I already mentioned in one of my edit summaries on this navbox, please don't link to redirects in navboxes, as explained at
WP:NAVNOREDIRECT. For example, you shouldn't link to [[Deductive]]
, which is a redirect; instead you should link to [[Deductive reasoning|Deductive]]
. Then the link will turn black in the navbox on the
Deductive reasoning page.
Biogeographist (
talk) 22:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Biogeographist: thanks for this, I was refining these definitions. Inductive/ deductive, abductive approaches fits better, where as a research strategy better reflects describing qual, quant, etc from reading further on this through Bryam (2012) Social Research methods. It would be important to revert back to the changes I made as they better reflect on the research process. Inductive, deductive, abductive approaches are key ways research is framed, I would suggest their individual pages need further updating to reflect their importance to the research process. Including these within the sidebar would be extremely beneficial for readers to link this within their learning of research overall. Jamzze ( talk) 22:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
@ Biogeographist: Thank you for changing the image. It is potentially not inclusive, however, of research as it is specific to a particular part of it. Then again, saying that, it might be very difficult to find an inclusive image without having something specifically created to depict 'research'. Jamzze ( talk) 23:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
Feel free to take a shot at improving on the image.Biogeographist ( talk) 18:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
@ Geysirhead: I removed the scientometrics section that you added. Above in § Removed outputs, we agreed that this template is about the process of research, and the outputs of research are out of scope for this template; scientometrics are already covered in the {{ Academic publishing}} template. Biogeographist ( talk) 17:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)