This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Renewable energy sources template. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Energy Template‑class | |||||||
|
Environment Template‑class | |||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add an image to this template which is relevant to the context. TechnicalEngineerA3 ( talk) 11:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC) TechnicalEngineerA3 ( talk) 11:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Not done: Thank you for the suggestion. The {{ edit semi-protected}} template is intended for a more detailed request to allow a non-auto-confirmed editor to make a specific change to a semi-protected article. If you'd like to be more specific you can reopen this request or you can leave it as it is and someone may take up your suggestion. Regards, Celestra ( talk) 17:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I know this has been discussed before. I would like to bring in a few new editors' opinions on whether biomass & biofuel could be removed from the template. Thank you. Brian Everlasting ( talk) 23:15, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
There are several main reasons why biomass and biofuel should be removed from the template. Before I discuss those reasons, let me confirm that my previous account,
User:TeH_nOmInAtOr has already voiced a few of those reasons.
I think those who are in favor of removing renewable energy sources because they pollute or have other negative long-term impacts (such as higher food prices) are conflating "renewable" with "sustainable". This confusion might be prevalent in popular culture but we should not perpetuate that here. I think we all can agree that something can be "renewable" without being "sustainable", right? Joja lozzo 00:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
I think we need understand and agree that including an energy source in this template doesn't mean it's a good source to include in a sustainable mix of renewable energy sources. (See Renewable energy debate which is about the suitability, acceptability and sustainability of certain renewable resources for deployment.) Joja lozzo 13:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Saheb kal ratree pasun aamchee light geleli aahe mseb office la nondani karun suddha kahich upyog nahi zale aahe 2402:8100:3135:AE15:E22B:8DC1:BD55:2212 ( talk) 15:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Renewable energy sources template. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
Energy Template‑class | |||||||
|
Environment Template‑class | |||||||
|
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add an image to this template which is relevant to the context. TechnicalEngineerA3 ( talk) 11:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC) TechnicalEngineerA3 ( talk) 11:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Not done: Thank you for the suggestion. The {{ edit semi-protected}} template is intended for a more detailed request to allow a non-auto-confirmed editor to make a specific change to a semi-protected article. If you'd like to be more specific you can reopen this request or you can leave it as it is and someone may take up your suggestion. Regards, Celestra ( talk) 17:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I know this has been discussed before. I would like to bring in a few new editors' opinions on whether biomass & biofuel could be removed from the template. Thank you. Brian Everlasting ( talk) 23:15, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
There are several main reasons why biomass and biofuel should be removed from the template. Before I discuss those reasons, let me confirm that my previous account,
User:TeH_nOmInAtOr has already voiced a few of those reasons.
I think those who are in favor of removing renewable energy sources because they pollute or have other negative long-term impacts (such as higher food prices) are conflating "renewable" with "sustainable". This confusion might be prevalent in popular culture but we should not perpetuate that here. I think we all can agree that something can be "renewable" without being "sustainable", right? Joja lozzo 00:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
I think we need understand and agree that including an energy source in this template doesn't mean it's a good source to include in a sustainable mix of renewable energy sources. (See Renewable energy debate which is about the suitability, acceptability and sustainability of certain renewable resources for deployment.) Joja lozzo 13:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Saheb kal ratree pasun aamchee light geleli aahe mseb office la nondani karun suddha kahich upyog nahi zale aahe 2402:8100:3135:AE15:E22B:8DC1:BD55:2212 ( talk) 15:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)