The text of the RPO article states that Yuri Temirkanov was appointed principal conductor in 1992. Should he not be included in the template? Tim Riley 09:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
hmmmm...you are correct. i don't think this template in its current form is flexible enough to handle the rpo's rather complex leadership structure. it's like they hand out titles like popcorn much like the dot.coms of yore. based on past conductors and current conductors...as far as i can tell, the order of precedence is:
i'll try to tease out what/who does/did what and when and try to reflect the results in the template. cheers. -- emerson7 | Talk 15:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Old Uncle Tom Cobbley was presumably omitted in error. Tim Riley 19:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
i've constructed a quick and dirty timeline from the data gleaned form the website. it becomes much more readily apparent when viewed graphically...most notably, the tendency towards overlapping tenures.
The text of the RPO article states that Yuri Temirkanov was appointed principal conductor in 1992. Should he not be included in the template? Tim Riley 09:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
hmmmm...you are correct. i don't think this template in its current form is flexible enough to handle the rpo's rather complex leadership structure. it's like they hand out titles like popcorn much like the dot.coms of yore. based on past conductors and current conductors...as far as i can tell, the order of precedence is:
i'll try to tease out what/who does/did what and when and try to reflect the results in the template. cheers. -- emerson7 | Talk 15:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Old Uncle Tom Cobbley was presumably omitted in error. Tim Riley 19:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
i've constructed a quick and dirty timeline from the data gleaned form the website. it becomes much more readily apparent when viewed graphically...most notably, the tendency towards overlapping tenures.