Biography: Politics and Government Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Hungary NA‑class | |||||||
|
Does this template have to be so gigantic? Given how stubby so many of our articles on Hungarian prime ministers are, this thing is a monstrosity. john k 05:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
How about now? I have removed the flags (they were too small anyway) and grouped a few short periods together. K issL 10:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
I'd still argue for a 9-régime version without the flags, which is now saved in the history. That's because those régimes were quite distinct, even if short. It also adds clarity - for instance, whom were G. Károlyi & Pattantyús-Ábrahám opposing? Plus, there is a hide button, if you can't stand it. After all, if you think this is bad, just see Greece. Biruitorul 04:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
(Copied from user talk page discussion for the record)
I think the seal of the prime minister belongs in the article. I added it, today, to the navbox for Hungarian prime ministers. I would go along with you that, with that addition there, it is not necessary in the succession box.
I would rather this were taken to the discussion page of the article. It is a relatively minor detail (we did translate the sodding article after all, from what was a pathetic stub, and is hardly good now) so you can imagine making small changes like this when it has been carefully considered beforehand, without an edit summary, can seem somewhat offhand.
Please continue at the talk page of th article. Si Trew ( talk) 23:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
HungarianPrimeMinisters}}
) I do also think it is too much to have it in the succession box.{{
HungarianPrimeMinisters}}
talk page, so it stands as a history of this discussion. Is that OK?Biography: Politics and Government Template‑class | ||||||||||
|
Hungary NA‑class | |||||||
|
Does this template have to be so gigantic? Given how stubby so many of our articles on Hungarian prime ministers are, this thing is a monstrosity. john k 05:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
How about now? I have removed the flags (they were too small anyway) and grouped a few short periods together. K issL 10:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
I'd still argue for a 9-régime version without the flags, which is now saved in the history. That's because those régimes were quite distinct, even if short. It also adds clarity - for instance, whom were G. Károlyi & Pattantyús-Ábrahám opposing? Plus, there is a hide button, if you can't stand it. After all, if you think this is bad, just see Greece. Biruitorul 04:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
(Copied from user talk page discussion for the record)
I think the seal of the prime minister belongs in the article. I added it, today, to the navbox for Hungarian prime ministers. I would go along with you that, with that addition there, it is not necessary in the succession box.
I would rather this were taken to the discussion page of the article. It is a relatively minor detail (we did translate the sodding article after all, from what was a pathetic stub, and is hardly good now) so you can imagine making small changes like this when it has been carefully considered beforehand, without an edit summary, can seem somewhat offhand.
Please continue at the talk page of th article. Si Trew ( talk) 23:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
{{
HungarianPrimeMinisters}}
) I do also think it is too much to have it in the succession box.{{
HungarianPrimeMinisters}}
talk page, so it stands as a history of this discussion. Is that OK?