This template is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd articles
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).
Articles
Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "
Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Yes – {{
Pink Floyd}} is ridiculously bloated and needs something to split off --
Ilovetopaint (
talk) 14:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)reply
No. It's not so cumbersome in this navbox. It should certainly not exist formatted in the way it is above with decade and year splits, which is incredibly cumbersome. It's fine as it is. See also
this discussion. --
Rob Sinden (
talk) 15:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)reply
No the {{
Pink Floyd}} is best place for this to go, unless people really want to remove it from the template and just replace it with a link to
Pink Floyd discography#Singles. Leaving as is is my vote though.
WikiVirusC(talk) 00:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2020
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd articles
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).
Articles
Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "
Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Yes – {{
Pink Floyd}} is ridiculously bloated and needs something to split off --
Ilovetopaint (
talk) 14:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)reply
No. It's not so cumbersome in this navbox. It should certainly not exist formatted in the way it is above with decade and year splits, which is incredibly cumbersome. It's fine as it is. See also
this discussion. --
Rob Sinden (
talk) 15:02, 11 July 2017 (UTC)reply
No the {{
Pink Floyd}} is best place for this to go, unless people really want to remove it from the template and just replace it with a link to
Pink Floyd discography#Singles. Leaving as is is my vote though.
WikiVirusC(talk) 00:17, 24 July 2017 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2020
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Not done. Not really a media nor a tribute.
◢ Ganbaruby! (
Say hi!) 12:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)