This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We should merge the data back. The consorts are over there, the Pharaohs over here. Where would we put non-ruling royal children? It's a nightmare. -- cheers, Michael C. Price talk 21:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
He has a wikipedia article, Bull (Pharaoh). 74.90.120.94 ( talk) 74.90.120.94 ( talk) 18:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
There is an English Wikipedia article for Hat Hor; I think the name in the template is incorrect (probably a typo). Looking at the articles for this person in the German and Spanish Wikipedias (which have articles about him), the German WP uses Hat-Hor; the Spanish uses Horus Hat. I think it should be fixed, but wanted to ask first before making a significant change to the template. -- FeanorStar7 ( talk) 01:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
current template, under Protodynastic, Lower Egypt: Wazner [;] Nat-Hor [de; es] [;] Mekh
suggested change to template: Wazner [;] Hat-Hor [;] Mekh
Who are Canide and Animal? The only references to these rulers appears to be in this template and related ones, but they are otherwise completely absent from all other relevant articles from Wikipedia and outside of Wikipedia. If there was a way to expand on their existence on other articles, then that would be very helpful, but I am currently skeptical as to their place in this template if I can't find any references to them (that don't source this template I may add). AnyGuy ( talk) 23:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Is it just me or do I remember a ton of name losts in the first intermediate period, specifically dynasties IX and X. Emmanuelbruh ( talk) 02:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
108.18.131.189 ( talk) 16:14, 19 December 2023 (UTC)i made this
Is that really necessary/appropriate for this template? I note that the Romans were added about eight months ago by a new editor currently indefinitely blocked as a sock. I recognise that by a loose-ish definition the Emperors were Pharaohs, but not to the point that adding them all in (and then adding the template to their pages) is useful, and i suggest that i will remove, unless there is strong objection. Happy days, ~ Lindsay H ello 20:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
one that reliable sources commonly and consistently refer to in describing the topic, such as the nationality of a person or the geographic location of a place"). Also, it's strange to have a template including Roman pharaohs at the foot of our Pharaohs article, as it opens with "until the annexation of Egypt by the Roman Empire in 30 BCE." NebY ( talk) 00:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Why is there a new section named ‘mythical period’. What does this add exactly? It only lists one pharaoh which doesn’t exist (yes I see the name). If there was a ‘mythical’ section that would be a bit better, it would’ve been in the beginning which the gods and demigods would be listed in. Emmanuelbruh ( talk) 01:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
As there hasn't been any further discussion in a couple of weeks, and all but one participant supported or leaned toward removing the section, I've taken it out. A. Parrot ( talk) 04:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
We should merge the data back. The consorts are over there, the Pharaohs over here. Where would we put non-ruling royal children? It's a nightmare. -- cheers, Michael C. Price talk 21:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
He has a wikipedia article, Bull (Pharaoh). 74.90.120.94 ( talk) 74.90.120.94 ( talk) 18:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
There is an English Wikipedia article for Hat Hor; I think the name in the template is incorrect (probably a typo). Looking at the articles for this person in the German and Spanish Wikipedias (which have articles about him), the German WP uses Hat-Hor; the Spanish uses Horus Hat. I think it should be fixed, but wanted to ask first before making a significant change to the template. -- FeanorStar7 ( talk) 01:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
current template, under Protodynastic, Lower Egypt: Wazner [;] Nat-Hor [de; es] [;] Mekh
suggested change to template: Wazner [;] Hat-Hor [;] Mekh
Who are Canide and Animal? The only references to these rulers appears to be in this template and related ones, but they are otherwise completely absent from all other relevant articles from Wikipedia and outside of Wikipedia. If there was a way to expand on their existence on other articles, then that would be very helpful, but I am currently skeptical as to their place in this template if I can't find any references to them (that don't source this template I may add). AnyGuy ( talk) 23:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Is it just me or do I remember a ton of name losts in the first intermediate period, specifically dynasties IX and X. Emmanuelbruh ( talk) 02:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
108.18.131.189 ( talk) 16:14, 19 December 2023 (UTC)i made this
Is that really necessary/appropriate for this template? I note that the Romans were added about eight months ago by a new editor currently indefinitely blocked as a sock. I recognise that by a loose-ish definition the Emperors were Pharaohs, but not to the point that adding them all in (and then adding the template to their pages) is useful, and i suggest that i will remove, unless there is strong objection. Happy days, ~ Lindsay H ello 20:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
one that reliable sources commonly and consistently refer to in describing the topic, such as the nationality of a person or the geographic location of a place"). Also, it's strange to have a template including Roman pharaohs at the foot of our Pharaohs article, as it opens with "until the annexation of Egypt by the Roman Empire in 30 BCE." NebY ( talk) 00:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Why is there a new section named ‘mythical period’. What does this add exactly? It only lists one pharaoh which doesn’t exist (yes I see the name). If there was a ‘mythical’ section that would be a bit better, it would’ve been in the beginning which the gods and demigods would be listed in. Emmanuelbruh ( talk) 01:32, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
As there hasn't been any further discussion in a couple of weeks, and all but one participant supported or leaned toward removing the section, I've taken it out. A. Parrot ( talk) 04:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC)