Yugoslavia NA‑class | |||||||
|
I am opposed to latest move of this template per WP:COMMON SENSE. @ Joy: please revert yourself.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 18:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
The name of the template is somewhat of a misnomer, as it also includes German personnel. Suggestions? K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:41, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
There has been recent inclusions of people that are of marginal importance at best. The Partisan personalities are basically national-level leaders and later corps or army commanders, the Germans are divisional or higher commanders but some recent Chetnik additions are equivalent to detachment commanders, and commanded only hundreds or at best a couple of thousand troops, compared to tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of troops for the Germans and Italians. We are not going to include every Chetnik commander, even down to the lowest level, are we? This would result in a ridiculous situation. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Yugoslavia NA‑class | |||||||
|
I am opposed to latest move of this template per WP:COMMON SENSE. @ Joy: please revert yourself.-- Antidiskriminator ( talk) 18:47, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
The name of the template is somewhat of a misnomer, as it also includes German personnel. Suggestions? K.e.coffman ( talk) 04:41, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
There has been recent inclusions of people that are of marginal importance at best. The Partisan personalities are basically national-level leaders and later corps or army commanders, the Germans are divisional or higher commanders but some recent Chetnik additions are equivalent to detachment commanders, and commanded only hundreds or at best a couple of thousand troops, compared to tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of troops for the Germans and Italians. We are not going to include every Chetnik commander, even down to the lowest level, are we? This would result in a ridiculous situation. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 02:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)