Physics Template‑class | |||||||
|
Using an image of nuclear fusion to represent nuclear physics becomes misleading when using this template on pages which are not discussing fusion, such as the Nuclear Fission page. I suggest we either remove the fusion specific image or change it to something less specific. Otherwise maybe we should call into question the overall usefulness of the templates themselves, as I believe this is an excellent case to point out how confusing and misleading templates can be for the general user. ~ Luminaux ( talk) 11:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
I strongly disagree to having the image of cooling towers like representation of nuclear physics. It represents rather power plant technology than physics. I am trying to figure out about some suitable one, but I will be happy for any suggestions here. -- Michalsmid ( talk) 16:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
a scientist is missing , Otto Hahn, ´lease i need to edit 177.40.185.142 ( talk) 03:28, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Largely a duplicate of our sidebar, with deeper focus on nucleosynthesis. Capt. Obvious suggests the merger. Another possible solution is to convert “Nuclear processes” navbox to a navbox for nucleosynthesis only, instead of one for “processes” in general (that are covered by “Nuclear physics”). Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 16:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Physics Template‑class | |||||||
|
Using an image of nuclear fusion to represent nuclear physics becomes misleading when using this template on pages which are not discussing fusion, such as the Nuclear Fission page. I suggest we either remove the fusion specific image or change it to something less specific. Otherwise maybe we should call into question the overall usefulness of the templates themselves, as I believe this is an excellent case to point out how confusing and misleading templates can be for the general user. ~ Luminaux ( talk) 11:13, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
I strongly disagree to having the image of cooling towers like representation of nuclear physics. It represents rather power plant technology than physics. I am trying to figure out about some suitable one, but I will be happy for any suggestions here. -- Michalsmid ( talk) 16:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
a scientist is missing , Otto Hahn, ´lease i need to edit 177.40.185.142 ( talk) 03:28, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Largely a duplicate of our sidebar, with deeper focus on nucleosynthesis. Capt. Obvious suggests the merger. Another possible solution is to convert “Nuclear processes” navbox to a navbox for nucleosynthesis only, instead of one for “processes” in general (that are covered by “Nuclear physics”). Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 16:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)