{{ editprotected}}
Change [[Category:All non-free media]]
to [[Category:All non-free media|{{PAGENAME}}]]
– that is, add a sort key. That way, the images will be sorted by their file name, rather than the word "Image:", in the category --
86.136.74.61 22:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
The template shouldn't be in the category, should it? Superm401 - Talk 11:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Howdy, this template is in the All non-free media category, which is meant for non-free media, not GFDL templates. There is some funny <noinclude> </noinclude>
business that moves it to the top of the category, but it seems more useful to leave information on the Category page itself, and include this in one of the template categories. I suggest
Category:Non-free image copyright tags, but I am no expert.
The current code:
[[Category:All non-free media|<noinclude> </noinclude>{{PAGENAME}}]]<noinclude> {{pp-template|small=yes}} {{template doc}} </noinclude>
Proposed code:
<includeonly>[[Category:All non-free media|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly><noinclude> {{pp-template|small=yes}} {{template doc}} [[Category:Non-free image copyright tags]] </noinclude>
Thanks, JackSchmidt ( talk) 04:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I am going to add {{ NOINDEX}} to this template to reduce the number of non-free images that show up on their own on google, see [1], technically, we are violating the NFCC #2 and #9 by making it available to crawlers both in the article and on the Image: page, instead of simply in the article. MBisanz talk 15:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
There is a proposal to add some metadata to this template. See Template talk:Non-free use rationale#Metadata flag for nonfree content for details. Looks uncontroversial to me. Regards — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Per the discussion linked above, please add license metadata to this template when |metadata=no
is not set.
This change should do it. I've
added |metadata=no
to the few templates where it seemed meaningful. --
Tgr (WMF) (
talk) 19:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request the changes shown in Special:Diff/950217174 are made. Compare File:ChristopherStreetMagIssue1.jpg, where the "license" in the bottom right corner defaults to "View license" and the image is automatically added to Category:Files with no machine-readable license, with File:InstitutleRosey.JPG, which correctly displays "Fair use" as the "license" and is not automatically added to Category:Files with no machine-readable license. The only difference is that Template:Non-free logo (used by File:InstitutleRosey.JPG) contains its own version of the machine readable license metadata, which would be the same as the license metadata in this template if the changes requested here were made, whereas Template:Non-free magazine cover (used by File:ChristopherStreetMagIssue1.jpg) does not contain its own version of the license metadata. GreenComputer ( talk) 21:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Change [[Category:All non-free media]]
to [[Category:All non-free media|{{PAGENAME}}]]
– that is, add a sort key. That way, the images will be sorted by their file name, rather than the word "Image:", in the category --
86.136.74.61 22:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
The template shouldn't be in the category, should it? Superm401 - Talk 11:47, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
{{ editprotected}}
Howdy, this template is in the All non-free media category, which is meant for non-free media, not GFDL templates. There is some funny <noinclude> </noinclude>
business that moves it to the top of the category, but it seems more useful to leave information on the Category page itself, and include this in one of the template categories. I suggest
Category:Non-free image copyright tags, but I am no expert.
The current code:
[[Category:All non-free media|<noinclude> </noinclude>{{PAGENAME}}]]<noinclude> {{pp-template|small=yes}} {{template doc}} </noinclude>
Proposed code:
<includeonly>[[Category:All non-free media|{{PAGENAME}}]]</includeonly><noinclude> {{pp-template|small=yes}} {{template doc}} [[Category:Non-free image copyright tags]] </noinclude>
Thanks, JackSchmidt ( talk) 04:40, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
I am going to add {{ NOINDEX}} to this template to reduce the number of non-free images that show up on their own on google, see [1], technically, we are violating the NFCC #2 and #9 by making it available to crawlers both in the article and on the Image: page, instead of simply in the article. MBisanz talk 15:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
There is a proposal to add some metadata to this template. See Template talk:Non-free use rationale#Metadata flag for nonfree content for details. Looks uncontroversial to me. Regards — Martin ( MSGJ · talk) 09:28, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Per the discussion linked above, please add license metadata to this template when |metadata=no
is not set.
This change should do it. I've
added |metadata=no
to the few templates where it seemed meaningful. --
Tgr (WMF) (
talk) 19:39, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I request the changes shown in Special:Diff/950217174 are made. Compare File:ChristopherStreetMagIssue1.jpg, where the "license" in the bottom right corner defaults to "View license" and the image is automatically added to Category:Files with no machine-readable license, with File:InstitutleRosey.JPG, which correctly displays "Fair use" as the "license" and is not automatically added to Category:Files with no machine-readable license. The only difference is that Template:Non-free logo (used by File:InstitutleRosey.JPG) contains its own version of the machine readable license metadata, which would be the same as the license metadata in this template if the changes requested here were made, whereas Template:Non-free magazine cover (used by File:ChristopherStreetMagIssue1.jpg) does not contain its own version of the license metadata. GreenComputer ( talk) 21:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)