This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles
unreferenced footnote†
See: bodystyle†: the dagger is no reference-link or any other. What is it? -
DePiep (
talk) 23:03, 12 May 2010 (UTC) -~ section title addedreply
The "bodystyle" parameter is the same as just "style".
Template:Navbox has documentation for "style", but no longer for "bodystyle". I just updated the documentation on this template to reflect that change. The parameter controls the style for the entire template (i.e. for the HTML table that the navbox is made out of). --
CapitalR (
talk) 23:35, 12 May 2010 (UTC)reply
Well, it was not about the word, it was about the thing†. Changed it into a reference (footnote). -
DePiep (
talk) 01:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles
unreferenced footnote†
See: bodystyle†: the dagger is no reference-link or any other. What is it? -
DePiep (
talk) 23:03, 12 May 2010 (UTC) -~ section title addedreply
The "bodystyle" parameter is the same as just "style".
Template:Navbox has documentation for "style", but no longer for "bodystyle". I just updated the documentation on this template to reflect that change. The parameter controls the style for the entire template (i.e. for the HTML table that the navbox is made out of). --
CapitalR (
talk) 23:35, 12 May 2010 (UTC)reply
Well, it was not about the word, it was about the thing†. Changed it into a reference (footnote). -
DePiep (
talk) 01:49, 13 May 2010 (UTC)reply