This template is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
How is the MusicBrainz icon that goes with this template an ad? On the contrary, it serves as a tool for easy recognition.
Cparker 05:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
No other external links on Wikipedia use logos.. using the logo implies that Wikipedia endorses and promotes Musicbrainz.
Rhobite 05:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
I've reviewed the [
TfD entry for this and related templates] and the general consensus was that the image was perfectly fine, and that perhaps other external links on Wikipedia should use logos after all. You seemed to be the only person who was opposed to having the images present within the templates.
Cparker 06:06, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Furthermore, I fail to see how using a MusicBrainz icon serves as an endorsement, yet the link to the MusicBrainz site is not being interpreted as such. Do you consider the
MusicBrainz article also an endorsement? There's a huge MB logo plastered on that very article.
Cparker 06:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
The Musicbrainz article describes the Musicbrainz service. It's fine to show their logo on that article. Doesn't imply endorsement, we're just illustrating their logo for readers. But there is a difference between the Musicbrainz article and hundreds of articles on musical albums and artists. An external link to Musicbrainz signifies that Wikipedia believes it's a useful resource - that's fine, if it is actually useful. Having an image on only the musicbrainz link implies that Wikipedia endorses MB above all other external links. It's the same as making the link bold, or green, or something.
Rhobite 06:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
ParserFunctions
I've rolled all the other MB album templates into this one using the
ParserFunctions. It now takes up to 10 discs, id1 … id10.
Dread Lord CyberSkull✎☠ 01:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Release vs. release group
I'm in favor of this template being deprecated, with new links only using the release-group template. The release group is intended to encapsulate all releases of an album (vinyl, cassette, CD, online, remasters) as well as multi-disc releases. Comments?
pbryan (
talk) 01:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)reply
In
NGS, which
will be introduced soon, release group will be much more usable, since it will cluster all release events in nice list:
example. I'd say Release Group will be favoured template instead of Release one soon :-)
LiDEL (
talk) 22:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)reply
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
How is the MusicBrainz icon that goes with this template an ad? On the contrary, it serves as a tool for easy recognition.
Cparker 05:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
No other external links on Wikipedia use logos.. using the logo implies that Wikipedia endorses and promotes Musicbrainz.
Rhobite 05:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
I've reviewed the [
TfD entry for this and related templates] and the general consensus was that the image was perfectly fine, and that perhaps other external links on Wikipedia should use logos after all. You seemed to be the only person who was opposed to having the images present within the templates.
Cparker 06:06, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
Furthermore, I fail to see how using a MusicBrainz icon serves as an endorsement, yet the link to the MusicBrainz site is not being interpreted as such. Do you consider the
MusicBrainz article also an endorsement? There's a huge MB logo plastered on that very article.
Cparker 06:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
The Musicbrainz article describes the Musicbrainz service. It's fine to show their logo on that article. Doesn't imply endorsement, we're just illustrating their logo for readers. But there is a difference between the Musicbrainz article and hundreds of articles on musical albums and artists. An external link to Musicbrainz signifies that Wikipedia believes it's a useful resource - that's fine, if it is actually useful. Having an image on only the musicbrainz link implies that Wikipedia endorses MB above all other external links. It's the same as making the link bold, or green, or something.
Rhobite 06:14, 26 January 2006 (UTC)reply
ParserFunctions
I've rolled all the other MB album templates into this one using the
ParserFunctions. It now takes up to 10 discs, id1 … id10.
Dread Lord CyberSkull✎☠ 01:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Release vs. release group
I'm in favor of this template being deprecated, with new links only using the release-group template. The release group is intended to encapsulate all releases of an album (vinyl, cassette, CD, online, remasters) as well as multi-disc releases. Comments?
pbryan (
talk) 01:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC)reply
In
NGS, which
will be introduced soon, release group will be much more usable, since it will cluster all release events in nice list:
example. I'd say Release Group will be favoured template instead of Release one soon :-)
LiDEL (
talk) 22:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)reply
