Telecommunications Template‑class | |||||||
|
What about Spread spectrum, isn't that also modulation ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by R U Bn ( talk • contribs).
Topics in Modulation techniques |
Analog modulation |
Digital modulation |
Digital multiplexing |
Spread spectrum |
Regarding the latest revisions to the template: (See the 7 June 2007 version to the right)
Mange01 13:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I think we should think of creating another template to complement this one. Thoughts? -- HappyCamper 05:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Multiplexing |
---|
Analog modulation |
Related topics |
Has some kind of error been made in this template's category? For one thing, I don't think this template talk page is supposed to show in the template category and more important surely nobody intended that all the articles with a modulation template be automatically categorized as being about templates. Anybody understand the formatting involved? Something about a noinclude anchor or something? Jim.henderson 14:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't claim to be any sort of expert in modulation techniques. But from an organization-of-information perspective, I can't help but notice:
Merely looking to spark discussion, and as I said I'm no expert. The redundancy gives me pause, and makes me wonder if there isn't a better way to organize things so that those articles are represented singly in a way that covers all relevant bases. ("Hybrid modulation"?) But I'm happy to be told "it's fine the way it is" if, indeed, it is. -- FeRD_NYC ( talk) 06:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
In this template, "WDM" links to the stub article for "Wavelet modulation", which makes no sense as a TLA.
But elsewhere "WDM" links to "Wavelength-division multiplexing". Should this template be fixed? Rich Rostrom ( Talk) 01:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Telecommunications Template‑class | |||||||
|
What about Spread spectrum, isn't that also modulation ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by R U Bn ( talk • contribs).
Topics in Modulation techniques |
Analog modulation |
Digital modulation |
Digital multiplexing |
Spread spectrum |
Regarding the latest revisions to the template: (See the 7 June 2007 version to the right)
Mange01 13:20, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I think we should think of creating another template to complement this one. Thoughts? -- HappyCamper 05:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Multiplexing |
---|
Analog modulation |
Related topics |
Has some kind of error been made in this template's category? For one thing, I don't think this template talk page is supposed to show in the template category and more important surely nobody intended that all the articles with a modulation template be automatically categorized as being about templates. Anybody understand the formatting involved? Something about a noinclude anchor or something? Jim.henderson 14:38, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
I don't claim to be any sort of expert in modulation techniques. But from an organization-of-information perspective, I can't help but notice:
Merely looking to spark discussion, and as I said I'm no expert. The redundancy gives me pause, and makes me wonder if there isn't a better way to organize things so that those articles are represented singly in a way that covers all relevant bases. ("Hybrid modulation"?) But I'm happy to be told "it's fine the way it is" if, indeed, it is. -- FeRD_NYC ( talk) 06:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
In this template, "WDM" links to the stub article for "Wavelet modulation", which makes no sense as a TLA.
But elsewhere "WDM" links to "Wavelength-division multiplexing". Should this template be fixed? Rich Rostrom ( Talk) 01:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)